I sadly, actually know a few, very few, that support 'white supremacy' even though they don't always acknowledge it even though they do spout it. I have never run across a Muslim that advocates violence.

Of course, that doesn't mean there aren't any, just that I have never run into them and I tend to believe what I see and hear from humans at least.

those profiting from anti-Muslim propaganda and of course the zealots from RW fundie churches.

I doubt they are 1/3 of the Muslim population, let alone 1/3 of the general population.

If 5% of the pop is Muslim, but they're responsible for 1/3 the murders, which group is really more of a danger?
Not to mention this group plays loose with the facts anyway

Am ai the only one who keeps reading that headline as "Snow White Supremacy".

All hail the Fairest of Them All!

Heheh....

Without factoring relative pop. size per group, this is less than useless.

Dont see many mixed race folks accepted in the white supremacist world. And if this is the same "study" from earlier this year, they left out some of the killings by muslims that didnt make headlines
ETA: Wonder how many deaths have been prevented by plots, from either group, that were caught before they could be carried out? I'd bet that would show a different story

There was a spike during the summer, but still the numbers of killings is still going down.

So what exactly is the big difference?

News media coverage.

When I was a kid, we'd see it on TV news, usually a half a day after it happned, at best.
Or read about it in newspapers or magazines, days or even weeks later.

When my parents were kids, murders were covered mostly by newsapers, days afterwards.

Nowadays?
We just about see them as they happen, in fact, sometimes we do see them as they happen.
And there are many different sources, some with clear biases, especially biases towards racial or religious groups, or conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones, WND, Media Research Center or talk radio blatherers.