Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pampango

(24,692 posts)
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 02:17 PM Oct 2015

NC senators, who voted for fast track, come out against TPP due to tobacco rules.

North Carolina’s two U.S. senators, Republicans Richard Burr and Thom Tillis, pounced. The reason? Tobacco.

As the Atlanta talks wrapped, word filtered out that tobacco had been left out of a closely watched, though technical, part of the deal – what’s known as a “carve out” in the lingo of trade talks. Carving out tobacco would ensure that tobacco companies could not use a process in international law that allows them to sue other countries over possibly harmful regulations. The rationale is that it would allow countries leeway to enact measures that are aimed at protecting the public’s health.

In tobacco, this boils down to curbing tobacco’s ability to mitigate antismoking efforts, which suppress tobacco sales. That ripples back to the farmers and fields in North Carolina and Virginia and Kentucky, home to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. The Tobacco Growers Association of North Carolina wrote to the state’s congressional delegation, saying the carve out is “alarming and un-American”...

Tillis and Burr both expressed opposition. Tillis has made the carve out a litmus test, saying it sets a “dangerous precedent.” “I will not only vote against the TPP, but actively work to help defeat its ratification in the Senate,” Tillis said.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/business/article38801031.html

Both Burr and Tillis voted for fast track but will vote against TPP. Interesting.

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
1. Whether it's not fascist enough or too fascist, that is the way we defeat this POS!!!
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 02:27 PM
Oct 2015

We'll need Republicans to help us defeat TPP. Perhaps this is one way to do this. Now if they put take this "carve out" out of the final bill that goes before the Senate to get these votes, it should serve as an example to Democratic congress critters why we needed them to vote down Fast Track, since all of the crap they'd been promised that the bill would have to get their vote will have been removed and they now have no other say other than to push Obama to veto it if gets too extreme for them knowing that this will increase their likelihood towards losing their seats. Unfortunately Obama's not running for office again, so is likely not as "persuadable" to veto something that gets changed for the worse later.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
3. They can't take the 'carve out' out of the final bill due to fast track. It's an up-or-down, as-is
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 02:41 PM
Oct 2015

vote.

Without fast track, republicans would undoubtedly remove the tobacco 'carve out' and change pharmaceutical and other rules that conservatives are mad about. Then it would have passed in both the republican-controlled House and Senate. Oddly fast track may have motivated Obama to agree to and submit a TPP that republicans will reject.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
5. It would mean they would have to go back and renegotiate TPP with the other countries...
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 03:40 PM
Oct 2015

... to come up with a version that doesn't have the carve-out provision in order to get a version that these senators would vote for. I'm guessing that other countries might say no to that change too.

This provides us more ammunition to be able to call Republican senators in other tobacco states to tell them to vote no too on this. Tell them that not only will their contributors be pissed if they vote yes on TPP, but their voting constituency will also be PO'd too.

TPP will be a bill we need to lobby senators on both sides of the aisle to vote no.

If Wyden votes yes, I'll call his office and said that I'll be happy to see Pete DeFazio take his office in 2016!

pampango

(24,692 posts)
9. Several countries have said they will not renegotiate TPP, so the tobacco carve-out is simply
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 04:31 PM
Oct 2015

not going to happen. It is interesting that Obama went for the carve-out. He must know that Big Tabacco would not be happy and it would cost him republican votes in tobacco states which he can't afford based on the closeness of fast track votes.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
10. And so many of us would be happy that it stays in!
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 04:42 PM
Oct 2015

If they aren't able to renegotiate that in time, it shows that world sanity still hopefully will ultimately win out and keep us from moving towards corporate fascism.

I wonder how many other corporate entities will lean hard on the tobacco industry to get them to pull back from their pressure on voting this down now. Perhaps there will be some buyout or other corporate pressure from other bigger companies on the tobacco giants. As someone else noted here, these smilies would be needed soon!



All the more reason to put more pressure on other tobacco state senators to get their no votes too now!

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
2. When it's time to vote a No vote counts the same, no matter the reason
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 02:29 PM
Oct 2015

So if they want to vote No because of tobacco, and that's what it takes to get them to a No vote, then I'll take it.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
4. Ohmigosh, wonderful! The international tobacco industry did NOT get what it wanted.
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 02:54 PM
Oct 2015

Afew years ago over 100 nations got together to encourage better health and wellbeing in their peoples. As part of this coalition, most agreed to pass laws similar to ours discouraging tobacco use.

Since then, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, on behalf of tobacco interests everywhere, has lead international lobbying and graft to try to destroy these efforts in each nation. The USCOC president has bragged publicly that they were in the process of getting the right to sue nations that passed laws restricting tobacco profits.

BTW, the chamber is a private organization, of course, but billions across the planet see the name U.S. and think we're behind this great evil.

I am SO glad!!! Go Obama!

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
6. They're already NOT getting what they wanted. Burr and Tillis want tobacco protected.
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 03:45 PM
Oct 2015

[hr][font color="blue"][center]"The whole world is a circus if you know how to look at it."
Tony Randall, 7 Faces of Dr. Lao (1964)
[/center][/font][hr]

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
8. Yes, and the rest of the GOP leadership -- on the wrong side of right as usual.
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 03:53 PM
Oct 2015

What are you saying? I'm talking about international tobacco's not getting the right to sue the U.S. and other TPP signatory nations for losses of profits due to anti-tobacco laws.

Are you saying McConnell, Tillis, et al will be able to block ratification over this?

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
11. I wonder if we can get other foreign national companies to line up to sue us for our ag subsidies...
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 04:47 PM
Oct 2015

That have "hurt their profits" in other countries when we ship underpriced corn products, etc. there. Maybe if that prospect becomes large that this will happen in ISDS courts if TPP passes, then the prospect of losing their ag subsidies will have our ag companies lobby Republican senators in states like Iowa and Nebraska to vote no too! There are ways to use this sort of issue to push corporate entities to work more for us too now I think.

mike dub

(541 posts)
13. As a North Carolinian, I wrote Sen. Burr, urging him to oppose TPP
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 06:59 PM
Oct 2015

...and got a letter back from his office that basically said he would Oppose it. Of course, he had tobacco interests in mind, not lil ol me. But weird that my right wing Senator appears to agree with me on one issue: against TPP.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NC senators, who voted fo...