Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

villager

(26,001 posts)
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 11:39 AM Oct 2015

Monsanto's Stock Is Tanking. Is the Company's Own Excitement About GMOs Backfiring?

Pity Monsanto, the genetically modified seed and agrichemical giant. Its share price has plunged 25 percent since the spring. Market prices for corn and soybeans are in the dumps, meaning Monsanto's main customers—farmers who specialize in those crops—have less money to spend on its pricey seeds and flagship herbicide (which recently got named a "probable carcinogen" by the World Health organization, spurring lawsuits).

Monsanto's long, noisy attempt to buy up rival pesticide giant Syngenta crumbled into dust last month. And Wednesday, Monsanto reported quarterly revenues and profits that sharply underperformed Wall Street expectations. For good measure, it also sharply lowered its profit projections for the year ahead.

In response to these unhappy trends, the company announced it was slashing 2,600 jobs, 12 percent of its workforce, and spending $3 billion to buy back shares. Share buybacks are a form of financial (as opposed to genetic) engineering—they magically boost a company's earnings-per-share ratio (a metric closely watched by investors) simply by removing shares from the market. And buybacks divert money from things like R&D—or keeping a company's workforce whole—and into the pockets of shareholders.

<snip>

In the call, Jeff Zekauskas, an analyst with JP MorganChase, asked Grant whether Monsanto was still interested in boosting its pesticide portfolio by buying a competitor. Grant's answer was essentially yes: "We still believe in the opportunity of integrated solutions," i.e., selling more pesticides along with seeds. He added:

"We've got a 400 million acre seed technology footprint. We've seen time and time again that we can increase revenue and improve grower service by bringing chemistry up on that footprint."

Translation: Our patented seeds and traits are sown on 400 million acres worldwide (about four times the size of California), and if we could sell more pesticides (chemistry) to the people who farm those acres, we could make more money.

<snip>

http://www.motherjones.com/tom-philpott/2015/10/monsanto-stock-decline-layoffs

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Monsanto's Stock Is Tanking. Is the Company's Own Excitement About GMOs Backfiring? (Original Post) villager Oct 2015 OP
The causality is backwards in the headline. jeff47 Oct 2015 #1

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
1. The causality is backwards in the headline.
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 11:50 AM
Oct 2015

Monsanto's a chemical company. The chemicals come first, their GMOs are a means to sell the chemicals.

And we're finding out that 1) There's environmental problems with their chemicals, so they'll likely be banned soon(ish), and 2) natural resistance to their chemicals is evolving faster than Monsanto expected, thus reducing their potential profits in the long-run.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Monsanto's Stock Is Tanki...