Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 05:18 PM Oct 2015

Cruz, Gohmert demand Smithsonian’s National Portrait Gallery to REMOVE Bust of Margaret Sanger

Two Texas Republicans, Sen. Ted Cruz and Rep. Louie Gohmert, wrote a letter demanding that a bust of eugenicist, abortion advocate and Planned Parenthood founder, Margaret Sanger, be removed from the Smithsonian’s National Portrait Gallery.


WASHINGTON, D.C. — Last week, U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and U.S. Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas), along with 24 House Republicans, sent a letter to the Director of the National Portrait Gallery Kim Sajet, calling for the immediate removal of Margaret Sanger’s bust from the Smithsonian’s National Portrait Gallery. The bust is on display in the Gallery’s “Struggle for Justice” exhibit.

Sanger, a founder of Planned Parenthood, believed in using contraceptives to control the population of minorities, or people she deemed as “undesirables.” Specifically, Sanger advocated for the extermination of African-Americans. The letter, written by Sen. Cruz, Rep. Gohmert, and other conservative members, echoes a recent petition of pastors and supporters affiliated with S.T.A.N.D. who also demanded that Sanger’s bust be removed.

“There is no ambiguity in what Margaret Sanger’s bust represents: hatred, racism, and the destruction of unborn life,” Sen. Cruz said. “Not only should we continue efforts to redirect funds from Planned Parenthood, an organization founded by Sanger that is currently under criminal investigation, we must also work to ensure that her inhumane life’s work is in no way promoted.”

“It is a complete and utter outrage to display a bust of Margaret Sanger in the National Portrait Gallery. In addition to this, it is appalling to honor her as part of the ‘Struggle for Justice’ collection,” Rep. Gohmert said. “One of the founders of Planned Parenthood, Mrs. Sanger portrayed deep-rooted racism by advocating birth control as a method for controlling the population of minorities. This prejudice must not be celebrated or exalted. Her bust should be removed not only from the exhibit but from the National Portrait Gallery altogether, since her legacy is one of prejudice against minorities and widespread destruction of their unborn human lives.”


Read more: http://www.bizpacreview.com/2015/10/15/cruz-gohmert-lead-demand-for-smithsonians-national-portrait-gallery-to-remove-this-immediately-263875#ixzz3ofpdCWUh

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
1. Leave her alone
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 05:22 PM
Oct 2015

As long as we have to tolerate Reagan's grinning visage everywhere, a few images of Margaret Sanger are no big deal.

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,719 posts)
2. Both of those "men" are an abomination to any right-thinking, free people!
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 05:23 PM
Oct 2015

So she wasn't perfect? Nobody is.

She did help found Planned Parenthood, and that fact alone is enough to keep her in the National Portrait Gallery.

The good she did far outweighs any bad.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
5. I think more than a few people were duped into believing in eugenics.
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 05:29 PM
Oct 2015

I don't think she founded PP just to "exterminate" black people. She really believed that women should have control over their reproductive systems. This article is SO slanted...

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
9. Well, I worked for PP of CT as a major gifts officer. I knew the history pretty well.
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 05:43 PM
Oct 2015

Our PP state affiliate (now PP of Southern New England to include Rhode Island) was founded by Estelle Griswold, who was important in the fight to FINALLY get the Supreme Court to rule on legalization of contraceptives in Griswold v. Connecticut, and was the basis for Roe v. Wade. The site of the clinic that was closed by police because they were dispensing diaphragms (against CT law) is one of the places I take newcomers on my "tour of New Haven's famous places." That clinic has moved several times since then and now operates a bifurcated building to literally separate the gynecological clinic and the clinic that provides abortion care. The people who claim that the funding is commingled are totally WRONG. When I was seeking major gifts I had to make that clear to donors for tax deduction purposes. The abortion side was NOT funded by government money. Period.

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,719 posts)
10. I'd say you know the history very well!
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 05:47 PM
Oct 2015

And it's interesting. It's good to hear the inside details from one who has been there!

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
12. Thanks. I think PPFA will have already set up a fund for private donations to this program.
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 05:57 PM
Oct 2015

That would be my guess, based on my fundraising background.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
3. LOL! Two creeps that nobody listens to! Hey Ted Fuckwad...where is the 26 billion you still owe us!?
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 05:26 PM
Oct 2015

Cruz would have her bust replaced with Hitler or Stalin. Two men he can identify with.

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
11. This is what you get when you start erasing history.
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 05:54 PM
Oct 2015

She may have made the trains run on time and broken a few eggs, but Margaret Sanger was an unreconstructed bigot who devoted her life to getting rid of minorities. Feet of ckay and all that.

There is Stalin's Volunteer Photoshop Legion, who wants to get rid of any reference to our party's founder, Andrew Jackson, and any southerner from the past. You made this bed. Explain why this is different.

femmocrat

(28,394 posts)
13. A really good article about Margaret Sanger, for a balanced view:
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 06:44 PM
Oct 2015

This scholarly article shows how Sanger was influenced by the times in which she lived. It gives a balanced view of her shortcomings, but illustrates that she was also
forward-thinking. The author goes into the how and why of her racial biases which were common at that time, even espoused by Teddy Roosevelt!

Excerpt: ". . . since anti-choice fanatics seem utterly incapable of making an honest argument in support of their position that Black women should be forced into childbirth rather than permitted to make their own decisions about what to do with their bodies, they resort to lies, misinformation, and half-truths about Sanger and the organization she founded."

http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2015/08/20/false-narratives-margaret-sanger-used-shame-black-women/

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Cruz, Gohmert demand Smit...