Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLooks like the NY Times is at it again
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/17/us/politics/obamas-comments-on-clinton-emails-collide-with-fbi-inquiry.html?_r=1Obamas Comments on Clinton Emails Collide With F.B.I. Inquiry
WASHINGTON Federal agents were still cataloging the classified information from Hillary Rodham Clintons personal email server last week when President Obama went on television and played down the matter.
I dont think it posed a national security problem, Mr. Obama said Sunday on CBSs 60 Minutes. He said it was a mistake for Mrs. Clinton to use a private email account when she was secretary of state, but his conclusion was unmistakable: This is not a situation in which Americas national security was endangered.
Those statements angered F.B.I. agents who have been working for months to determine whether Ms. Clintons email setup had in fact put any of the nations secrets at risk, according to current and former law enforcement officials.
=======================================================================
That's the three lead paragraphs of this story, but guess what? No where in the story is there any quote from anyone currently from the FBI making any such claim.
Then, they go so far as to pull up something the President said early in the Petreyus story to make some kind of connection.
Did "effing" Murdoch buy the Times too, or does he just own some of their hack writers.
This story is "effing" ridiculous, but just watch the "righties" snatch onto it like a tick on an elephants ass.
This is something I would expect to see in the Washington Times, but it's perfect for the Reich Wing, because it's anti-Obama and Hillary, and came from a source they will claim is the "Liberal Media".
Whoever wrote this claptrap deserves to be fired for journalistic malpractice.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 725 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Looks like the NY Times is at it again (Original Post)
maxrandb
Oct 2015
OP
randys1
(16,286 posts)1. Hillary is HATED viciously by many people, and destroying her is
the agenda of many many many .
Rex
(65,616 posts)2. The NYT lost all cred after the many, many years spent bootlicking GWB and Cheney.
They might as well be called the NYTCIA.
maxrandb
(15,364 posts)3. Surprise Surprise!
Guess what is the "blue light special" on Sludge and Limpballs lead today