Eisenhower spent time playing golf and saving the world. Mitt committed hate crimes against a dog and a gay student.

I don't use Twitter....I just don't feel comfortable for some reason...same with facebook...I have accounts that just sleep...but this Tweet is inspiring...I'm going to try it again.

I really started with it during the Green uprising in Iran. I followed someone whose handle was @PersianKiwi. I have no idea what happened to this person. I realized that this short form could be vital. Longer messages aren't practical.

Since then I have followed a variety of people and groups. Some I drop because of various reasons. I don't like to follow people who constantly tweet. Cher is great, but there is a lot of her info that isn't interesting to me. I scroll back through tweets of some people to see what's up. Twitter is also great for breaking news, but you have to keep up if it's a fast moving story. Checking more than one source is vital to wade through rumor.

I think Twitter is as good or as bad as you make it. Finding the right mix of people and categories to follow is crucial. I love being able to drop and add sources so easily.

You can reach those from the other side. Like if you respond to a repug and use the right method his followers will also see your remarks. And possibly embarrass the hell out of both. For the most part, the 140 character limit is sufficient. Besides, it is important to keep it short so you don't go over their attention span.

Of course it is ridiculous to say that any one person single-handedly won WWII. But he was an important part of a collective effort to destroy the ambitions of one of the most evil men ever to lead a major military power.

Just saying.

is one of the few that's actually worth the time to read.

I got this from some other blogger;
Trying to convert French Catholics into his Mormon cult, while living in a mansion with maids and cooks;
President Carter, Naval graduate, Mitt yacht owner
The list goes on.

Does anyone have details of the FDIC bailout for Bain. Somehow I missed that one.

Why isn't this being talked about? Well, I know why FOX isn't but this OP was the first I heard of this.
It seem Romney has given enough reasons to be able to counter almost any thing he says, yet I still hear people support him.

Just how do people "forgive" so many of his failures?

Maybe the deal was too convoluted (it was) and there are too many people who would be harmed if it got dredged up again. Or maybe it's just because the mainstream media is just plain pathetic.

I have a feeling though that the Obama campaign will push it if they feel it's needed.

That a bald guy couldn't get elected now. We have really become so superficial.

be ignored by today's rethugs. I have noticed how the rethugs NEVER acknowledge him. Old st ronnie could do nothing wrong - Ike?......who?

Any member of today's Rethuglican Party would have sent in the troops to help put down the "Black Insurrection".

and even Nixon, for that matter--as being typical of the "far left fringe."

This is brilliant.

a murderous, genocidal regime.

Mitt = went to France to avoid the draft and proselytize French people.

Romney kept them on the roof of his car, around Seamus' neck.