General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnderson Cooper: Opposing Illegal CIA Wars Is "Unelectable"
(Truthout) A key reason that the US has so many wars is that big US media have a strong pro-war, pro-empire bias. You rarely see big US media badgering a politician for supporting a war that turned out to be a catastrophe. But it's commonplace for big US media to badger politicians for opposing wars, even catastrophic ones.
CNN journalist Anderson Cooper is a perfect example of this phenomenon.
Here's Anderson Cooper, badgering Bernie Sanders at the first Democratic debate for opposing the CIA's illegal war on Nicaragua in the 1980s:
The question is really about electability here, and that's what I'm trying to get at. You - the - the Republican attack ad against you in a general election - it writes itself. You supported the Sandinistas in Nicaragua. You honeymooned in the Soviet Union. And just this weekend, you said you're not a capitalist. Doesn't - doesn't that ad write itself?
Millions of Americans "supported the Sandinistas in Nicaragua" in the 1980s. In 1979, the Sandinista National Liberation Front overthrew the US government-installed Somoza dictatorship in Nicaragua, promising to address Nicaragua's extreme poverty and the lack of basic government services like education and health care for the majority of the population. In 1982, Nicaragua was recognized by the World Health Organization as the third world country that had made the most progress in health care.
Under the Reagan administration, the CIA organized a terrorist army (the "Contras" to attack the Nicaraguan government. Millions of Americans participated in a solidarity movement to oppose US military intervention in Nicaragua, including public radio host Ira Glass, actors Ed Asner, Mike Farrell and Diane Ladd, civil rights leader Julian Bond and engineer Ben Linder, who was killed in a terrorist attack by the CIA's army. The US-Nicaragua solidarity movement succeeded in passing the Boland Amendment in Congress, cutting off US funding to the CIA's terrorist army, which led the Reagan administration to try to fund the Contras illegally through arms sales to Iran. When these illegal activities were exposed, it became the Iran-Contra scandal.
During this period, Anderson Cooper was working for the CIA. ................(more)
http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/33248-anderson-cooper-opposing-illegal-cia-wars-is-unelectable
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Thanks to MOCKINGBIRD, the USA's people are misinformed. Still, thanks to people who actually, you know, believe in democracy -- every day, more realize who's been doing the lying.
Great article, that, marmar. Thank you for the heads-up.
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)Little to no doubt.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Don't recall anything but torpedoes aimed at sinking anyone and anything remotely progressive, liberal or democratic. And zero mention of what roles played by the BFEE in creating the current situation.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)just sayin'
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)Not just Anderson Cooper.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)ronnie624
(5,764 posts)But the US media establishment, generally speaking, definitely has a "pro-war pro-empire bias".
Did you read the article, or are you just dissembling?
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)It's more of an opinion piece using cherry-picked anecdotal evidence to support a specious conclusion...
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)your two sentence post is definitely not an article.
I challenge you to demonstrate the speciousness of the author's conclusion.
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)I like reading truth.
odd_duck
(107 posts)Boy, nothing ever changes.....Nod, nod....wink, wink.
karynnj
(59,504 posts)by the mainstream Democrats. Had he voted against the IWR and waited until 2008 to run, he almost certainly would have won. (There is no reason to assume that Dean, Edwards or whoever became the 2004 candidate would have selected or even been told to look at Obama.)
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Conquest lived to see a current U.S. presidential candidate, a senator, who had chosen, surely as an ideological gesture, to spend his honeymoon in the Soviet Union in 1988. Gulags still functioned, probably including some of the cold Auschwitzes in Siberia, described in Conquests 'Kolyma.' The honeymooner did not mind that in 1988 political prisoners wereas may still be the casebeing tortured in psychiatric hospitals. Thanks to the unblinking honesty of people like Conquest, the Soviet Union now is such a receding memory that Bernie Sanderss moral obtusenessthe obverse of Conquests characteris considered an amusing eccentricity....
In 1956, President Eisenhower launched the program that a decade later would be called Sister Cities International, a program still in existence today. The idea was to promote peace and understanding through connections between cities in the United States and, at first, Western Europe. The program soon spread. In 1973, Seattle became a sister city of Tashkent, the capital of Uzbekistan, then under Soviet rule. Other U.S.-Soviet sister cities soon followed despite the tensions of the Cold War.
In 1988, Burlington sistered with Yaroslavl, a city 160 miles north of Moscow. That was the same year Sanders married his second wife, Jane. In fact, the day after they married, they headed out to Yaroslavl. So, one could call it a honeymoon, and the pair have both done so, but jokingly or sarcastically. The reason for that is that they didn't go alone. There were 10 other people from Burlington who went with them. It was a trip dotted with diplomacy, official meetings and numerous interviews. Not most people's idea of a honeymoon getaway.
Uncle Joe
(58,424 posts)Thanks for the thread, marmar.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Corporatist propaganda, 100% of the time. No surprise. They don't even realize there IS anything other than the big lie.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)LuvNewcastle
(16,858 posts)that I know, a lot of the questions I had about him fall into place.