General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsandrea mitchell thinks Hillary has a 'lot of explaining to do'
get this lady off the airwaves....
riversedge
(70,204 posts)Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Mrs. Greenspan needs her job. How will she and her husband Alan live without her income.
Her and Dead Intern Joe should be canned.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Leon Panetta, Gen. Dempsey. You know, the people the GOP don't want to hurt.
spanone
(135,829 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)after he won his second term. But they don't want to hurt the Deep State guys, the military, and the Obama administration insiders who aren't ever going to run for office.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)still_one
(92,186 posts)spanone
(135,829 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Considering her husband is responsible for so much misery in this country, she should find a rock to hide under. Wait until the day comes, that the commoner finds out just how much fucking over of America the Greenspans have done.
That picture is perfect, the entitled spewing GOP propaganda machine is numb to truth or honesty.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)his capitulation to W was the beginning of the economic chaos that ensued.
Rex
(65,616 posts)David Leonhardts article, Yes, 47% of Households Owe No Taxes. Look Closer, in Tuesdays New York Times was excellent, but it just scratches the tip of the iceberg of how the rich have gained at the expense of the working class during the past three decades. When Ronald Reagan became President in 1981, he abandoned the traditional economic policies, under which the United States had operated for the previous 40 years, and launched the nation in a dangerous new direction. As Newsweek magazine put it in its March 2, 1981 issue, Reagan thus gambled the future his own, his partys, and in some measure the nationson a perilous and largely untested new course called supply-side economics.
Essentially, Reagan switched the federal government from what he critically called, a tax and spend policy, to a borrow and spend policy, where the government continued its heavy spending, but used borrowed money instead of tax revenue to pay the bills. The results were catastrophic. Although it had taken the United States more than 200 years to accumulate the first $1 trillion of national debt, it took only five years under Reagan to add the second one trillion dollars to the debt. By the end of the 12 years of the Reagan-Bush administrations, the national debt had quadrupled to $4 trillion!
Ronald Reagan and Alan Greenspan pulled off one of the greatest frauds ever perpetrated against the American people in the history of this great nation, and the underlying scam is still alive and well, more than a quarter century later. It represents the very foundation upon which the economic malpractice that led the nation to the great economic collapse of 2008 was built. Ronald Reagan was a cunning politician, but he didnt know much about economics. Alan Greenspan was an economist, who had no reluctance to work with a politician on a plan that would further the cause of the right-wing goals that both he and President Reagan shared.
Rose Siding
(32,623 posts)their security of the intelligence post. No? crap!
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)spanone
(135,829 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)mfcorey1
(11,001 posts)kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)tavernier
(12,383 posts)She got the skinny bitch gene. I opted for heart and integrity. I win.
spanone
(135,829 posts)AndreaCG
(2,331 posts)tavernier
(12,383 posts)...
...
...um, actually, no. None. Whew.
Response to spanone (Original post)
BigDemVoter This message was self-deleted by its author.
tavernier
(12,383 posts)Finally something I can relate to!
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Also, she's probably just an asshole. Who is drunk. Which makes her even a bigger asshole.
Response to smirkymonkey (Reply #25)
BigDemVoter This message was self-deleted by its author.
donna123
(182 posts)but I don't understand how in the world someone like her gets her own show. She stutters and can't get words out. She cannot seem to speak extemporaneously. She seems smart enough but she simply does not have the gift of speech. Perhaps working behind the scenes would be a better fit for her because she is not smooth onscreen. I suspect the reason she has a show is for political reasons, ie knowing the right people, because it is certainly not due to talent in this particular area.