That's the problem the folks have with the uber wealthy. They think that every dropping from their mouths is pure gold, and their supporters hope some of it will fall into their pockets. Facts and truth mean nothing, they all jump onboard with that reality. There were a lot of Moonie convesions in the Deep South, and that included some of the old white supremacists. When it's all said and done, people will believe what they want to believe. If they thought about it, the rich aren't any better or smarter than the rest of us, just richer and what they say doesn't mean squat.

who has strong ties with China's communist party. As does he.

http://www.esquire.com/the-side/richardson-report/rupert-mudoch-communist-business-ties-100609

The handing over of US manufacturing (and Walmart by Jackson Stephens) to Chinese industrialists didn't happen in a vacuum. It was a Bush family plan - GHWBush and his brother Prescott, along with Jackson Stephens - global fascism - NWO.

I shocked a couple RW family members when I informed them that he owned the Times. Of course, they didn't believe me so I then I hit them with the Bush connection.

I, for one, have never googled for the latest news on Matt Drudge. He's as lousy an excuse for a journalist as James O'Keefe. He makes Bill O'Reilly look like Pulitzer Prize material.

He is now what he's always been: irrelevant. Just like the Washington Times.

Calling Murdoch an "Australian extortionist" is not different than someone calling an immigrant to the US from Mexico a "filthy Mexican." Some US citizens, including Murdoch, are extortionists. Some US citizens, I would guess including some from other countries, actually are filthy. In neither case does using their country of origin as an adjective to an insult add anything relevant to a discussion. It's not nice to criticize someone because of their nation of origin or race - in fact, it's xenophobic by definition. Is it just that no matter how much the law says all citizens are equal, immigrants will always be suspect and less equal than "born and bred" Americans? How nice of you.

You can think whatever you want - I don't give a hoot what you need to tell yourself.

xenophobia |ˌzēnəˈfōbēə; ˌzenə-|
noun
intense or irrational dislike or fear of people from other countries

So, it's worse that these people are from other countries is what you're saying, right? Using someone's foreignness as an epithet is nothing new; see, for instance, "international jew."

you can bark all you want, but, it's still the wrong tree

It highlights the fact that they are GLOBAL FASCISTS and were tapped for the propaganda duty by the fascist Bush family, GHWBush and Prescott Bush and American global fascist Jackson Stephens (a BCCI figure, as well) who made their deals with Chinese industrialists in the 70s, and Fascist Stephens brought American traitor company WalMart to the table as their bargaining chip with the Chinese industrialists.

Now....what part of the GLOBAL FASCIST AGENDA do you still not get?

for their pal, GHWBush, and for their longterm goal of NWO and its global fascist agenda. You can't have a GLOBAL fascist agenda without the cooperation of other global fascists from other parts of the globe, now, can you?

Murdoch, an American, still owns businesses in the UK and Australia. He's vilified enough over here for his actions, without having to be smeared as "American, Rupert Murdoch." I've said it before, and I'll say it again: using someone's status as an immigrant as an insult is an insult to all immigrants.

of their fascist agenda. You have your own narrow view of my post and that has you STILL barking up the wrong tree.

.

.

Thanks for the thread, blm.