The statute is C. G. S. A. § 53a-183a. The state Supreme Court upheld the law as not an infringement of the First Amendment by a 5-0 vote.
http://www.ctsportsmen.com/issues/state_supreme_court_upholds_hunt.htm


Connecticut Dept of Energy and Environmental Protection

DEALING WITH HARASSMENT

All hunters regardless of where they hunt should be prepared for the possibility of being harassed by anti-hunters. Anti-hunting groups often use harassment tactics to generate publicity, so newspaper and television reporters may be present. Your behavior if you are harassed is extremely important. Maintain your composure and do not retaliate. If you are interviewed by the media, project a positive image. Remember, Connecticut has a hunter harassment law that protects the rights of sportsmen. If you decide to press charges on your antagonists make sure you have a strong case by:

making it evident that they are following you by going in several directions,
asking your antagonists why they are harassing you,
being able to identify and describe the individuals,
taking the license numbers of their autos if possible and by,
not responding to violence or threatening a protester with bodily harm.

No expectation of privacy in public. I seriously doubt the law in CT prevents anyone from merely taking pictures.

It makes two or more acts of photography with intent to harass a crime.

29.083 (2) (a) 7. Engaging in a series of 2 or more acts carried out over time,
19however short or long, that show a continuity of purpose and that are intended to
20impede or obstruct a person who is engaged in lawful hunting, fishing, or trapping,
1or an activity associated with lawful hunting, fishing, or trapping, including any of
2the following:
3 a. Maintaining a visual or physical proximity to the person.
4 b. Approaching or confronting the person.
5 c. Photographing, videotaping, audiotaping, or through other electronic means,
6monitoring or recording the activities of the person. This subd. 7. c. applies
7regardless of where the act occurs.

You have a right to photograph in public, but not a right to harass someone with it. An abusive ex-domestic partner who follows his former girlfriend/wife around and photographs her will clearly get arrested. This different from police officers who are carrying out public duties. Many states have similar laws to stop anti-abortion nuts from stalking and harassing women and clinic workers.

Then that won't fly. Sorry. And I have a hard time believing CT law claims pictures alone as harassment. I live in CT.

But for the sane people it will be dystopia.

It will basically gut the system. Injured workers will get paid pretty much nothing for their injuries and the system will be set up to keep attorneys out of the picture to help the injured workers.

And plenty of other things coming in this new session of the legislature. Fucking assholes.

harass. Walking into a state park with your camera is not going to get you arrested, good lord.

The story is then factually inaccurate when it states without additional qualifications, "the bill would prohibit people from photographing the hunting of bears and wolves on public land."?

What then is the relevant and objective source denying the written statement as is?

The types of serial conduct prohibited include maintaining a visual or physical proximity to the person,
approaching or confronting the person, or photographing the person.