General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow Economics Became a Right-Wing Field
Meanwhile, Elys economics colleagues were moving in the other direction, and not simply under duress, as Adams had been. University presidents seeking stature for their institutions appealed to rich donors among the periods Robber Barons, and that appeal was unlikely to be successful when rabble-rousers in the economics department were questioning the foundations of American capitalism, in particular the monopolization and labor exploitation that made the Robber Barons rich in the first place. At the same time, some of the more moderate members of the economics old school were making overtures to moderates in the new, recognizing the threat that manifestly improved scholarship posed to their authority in the field. Also in 1886, Charles Dunbar, the chair of the Harvard department, brought out the first issue of the Quarterly Journal of Economics, an alternative peer-reviewed channel to the AEAs Proceedings (now the American Economic Review, to date the leading journal in the field), which was under Elys iron grip. His opening essay welcomed the empirics of the AEAs cohort but denounced any tendency to political or social reforma direct challenge to Ely.
...
What was lost in the eclipse of radicalism at the AEA? The economic tracts of that era began to enshrine the perfectly competitive market at the center of the intellectual firmament in economicswork then being formalized mathematically overseas by Leon Walras and Alfred Marshall, to be imported to the US by the likes of Clark and Irving Fisher and embellished by their successors in the mid-to-late 20th century. There has always been disagreement within the academic economics establishment, but it has largely adhered to the establishmentarian bent set down in 1892and won itself great intellectual prestige in so doing. What political involvement there is in the field is almost exclusively on the Right, as attested by recent cases of donor influence on economics departments at Florida State, Kansas, and numerous others, aimed at routing out any challenge to free market orthodoxy. Much more notable than those cases of overt politicization is the broader alliance of economics with the countrys business establishment, in the form of lavishly funded business schools and research programs to the benefit of the field, far and above whats available to any other discipline.
http://histphil.org/2015/10/19/economics-was-once-radical-then-it-decided-not-to-be/
http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2015/11/how-economics-became-a-right-wing-field
annabanana
(52,791 posts)louis-t
(23,295 posts)Who knew?
DJ13
(23,671 posts)rogerashton
(3,920 posts)and there have been tendencies in both directions since. Keynesian economics, including some fairly radical folks like Joan Robinson and Abba Lerner, were influential enough in 1970 that I remember Paul Samuelson -- a liberal, although very anti-Marxist -- regretting that there were so few conservatives in economics, saying, "In a two-party society we need to have two parties." Well, the conservative economists came in like a rumbling herd for the next 40 years -- but the trend in econ pretty much paralleled the trends in other parts of society. And the lit specialists I know are more conservative than the economists, but that is probably an unrepresentative sample.
daleo
(21,317 posts)Thus, a preponderance of right wing thinkers currently are in the field.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)as economists, the phlogiston theory would still be taught.
No matter how much laissez faire fails it cannot ever be questioned.
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)One must be in complete denial of a number of fundamental scientific principles in order to embrace mainstream economic 'theory'. The fact that so many highly educated people swallow the nonsense, speaks to the effectiveness of cradle-to-grave exposure to ideological propaganda.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)The Chicago School of Economics is ground zero for conservative economists and the veneer of legitimacy they give robber barons.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)fifty or one hundred years, one question will be the hardest to answer: Was Adolf Hitler or Milton Friedman responsible for more needless human suffering and misery.
I'd say Friedman. His zombie followers are still very much on the march, spreading destruction wherever they go.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Are they big followers of Friedman?
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)and get back to me.
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)In 2005, Feldstein was widely considered a leading candidate to succeed chairman Alan Greenspan as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board. This was in part due to his prominence in the Reagan administration and his position as an economic advisor for the Bush presidential campaign. The New York Times wrote an editorial advocating that Bush choose either Feldstein or Ben Bernanke due to their credentials, and the week of the nomination The Economist predicted that the two men had the greatest probability of selection out of the field of candidates.[4] Ultimately, the position went to Bernanke, possibly because Feldstein was a board member of AIG, which announced the same year that it would restate five years of past financial reports by $2.7 billion. Subsequently, AIG suffered a massive financial collapse that played a central role in the worldwide economic crisis of 200708 and the ensuing global recession. The firm was rescued only by multiple capital infusions by the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank, which extended a $182.5 billion line of credit. Although Feldstein was not explicitly linked to the accounting practices in question, he had served as a Director of AIG since 1988. In March 2007, the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation announced that one of four 2007 Bradley Prizes to honor outstanding achievement would be awarded to Feldstein.[5] On September 10, 2007, Feldstein announced that he would be stepping down as president of NBER effective June 2008.[6]
Octafish
(55,745 posts)"The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness." -- Amb. John Kenneth Galbraith, statesman, economist and father of economists, diplomats, and scholars.