General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRalph Nader Mansplains Monetary Policy to Janet Yellen
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/11/nader-mansplains-monetary-policy-to-yellen.htmlThat last bit astonishingly, or maybe not so astonishingly is a real-life, actual suggestion being made by Ralph Nader, who dings Yellen for hurting seniors, not helping payday-loan borrowers, being in the pocket of the big banks, and for playing politics, all in one fantastically sexist opinion piece.
Chairwoman Yellen, I think you should sit down with your Nobel Prize winning husband, economist George Akerlof, who is known to be consumer-sensitive. Together, figure out what to do for tens of millions of Americans who, with more interest income, could stimulate the economy by spending toward the necessities of life.
For heaven's sake, you're a "liberal" from Berkeley! That is supposed to mean something other than to be indentured by the culture and jargon of the Federal Reserve. If you need further nudging on monetary and regulatory policies of the Fed, other than interest rate decisions, why not invite Berkeley Professor Robert Reich, one of your long-time friends and admirers, to lunch on your next trip home?
Readers will be stunned, STUNNED, to learn that (a) Janet Yellen's husband agrees with her on macroeconomic issues; (b) Robert Reich agrees with Yellen and disagrees with Nader on interest rates; and (c) Janet Yellen--the Chair of the Fed--already has an understanding of how interest rates affect people and the economy, and doesn't need her husband to tell her what to think on the matter.
Being a sexist jackass doesn't mean you're right on economic policy, Ralphie.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)since he cost us the Presidency in 2000.
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)brush
(53,871 posts)I can't believe that people still defend this narcissist on his role in Florida in 2000.
G_j
(40,371 posts)I couldn't find it.
Jim__
(14,083 posts)& it's not part of the letter.
Jim__
(14,083 posts)For heaven's sake, you're a "liberal" from Berkeley! That is supposed to mean something other than to be indentured by the culture and jargon of the Federal Reserve. If you need further nudging on monetary and regulatory policies of the Fed, other than interest rate decisions, why not invite Berkeley Professor Robert Reich, one of your long-time friends and admirers, to lunch on your next trip home?
Start imagining what we, the savers, have to endure because of plutocratic, crony capitalism for which the Federal Reserve has long been a leading Tribune.
Can we expect your response?
G_j
(40,371 posts)"It has been hard having a woman lead the world's most powerful economic institution, the Federal Reserve. Federal Open Market Committee meetings have become giant cryfests, punctuated by breaks for emotional overeating. Interest-rate setting has started to align with the lunar cycle. Worst, Janet Yellen, with her small lady brain, has failed to grok that low interest rates harm savers. She'd better sit down with her husband so he can explain that to her! "
Jim__
(14,083 posts)I didn't realize that you were referring to the Annie Lowrey's first paragraph. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)It's paraphrasing Nader's language telling Yellen to talk to her husband to help her understand economic issues.
and to even call it paraphrasing is a joke.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)This is a pretty good example of how sexism saturates his thinking.
he's also pretty much an idiot when it comes to economics, but that's another discussion.
The author pretty much nailed the sexism behind Nader's suggestion that the Fed Chairwoman needed her husband to explain interest rates to her.
G_j
(40,371 posts)but you might point out what sexist remark he actually made in this letter.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)about the basics of her profession from her husband?
Let's try this:
"Senator Warren, I suggest you talk to your husband to help figure out how to pass legislation in Congress."
"Ms. Winfrey, I suggest you talk to your boyfriend about how to run a media company."
"Ms. Merkel, I suggest you talk to your husband about how to manage the Bundestag."
G_j
(40,371 posts)Nobel Prize winning husband, economist George Akerlof, who is known to be consumer-sensitive.
...perhaps his intent was sexist, but this doesn't nessesarly demonstrate that intent.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)She is more qualified than anyone to assess the effects of interest rates on the economy and citizens.
It is incredibly sexist to suggest that she needs men--including her husband- to explain the basics of her own job to her.
Most people--especially women--get this.
Telling women to have their husbands explain something to them is an old patriarchal favorite of sexists.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)means fewer jobs.
Maybe he should ask his wife to explain it to him.