Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Uncle Joe

(58,445 posts)
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 10:20 PM Nov 2015

HISTORIC: Koch Brothers Lose Big, Seattle Votes Big Money Out of Politics



Much to the detriment of Washington State’s biggest corporate donors like Microsoft and Starbucks, and to the chagrin of Seattle’s newspaper of record, Seattle voters have elected to have publicly-financed elections, and to severely limit the influence of corporate power on city hall.

The I-122 initiative — also known as “Honest Elections Seattle” — passed with 60 percent of votes cast. The initiative provides $100 in “Democracy Vouchers” for each of Seattle’s 400,000-plus registered voters, meaning that ordinary voters can counter corporate influence on elections by up to $40 million in a given cycle. The funding for the vouchers comes from an $8 property tax levied on homes worth $400,000 or more.

but I-122 does more than just provide public campaign financing — I-122 also prohibits corporations that do more than $250,000 in annual business with the city from donating to local political campaigns. It also outright bans all donations from corporations that put more than $5,000 a year into lobbying elected officials.

Voters in Seattle have good reason to demand publicly-financed elections, given the disproportionate influence corporate donors have won through campaign donations and lobbying. As Occupy.com reported, Mayor Ed Murray’s 2013 campaign asked for and received the maximum allowed donation from Microsoft. After Murray won the election, Microsoft was awarded a $46,000 contract to provide tech support for Murray’s transition team.

But that’s just one example — the below list, compiled by the Seattle-based Sightline Institute, shows how corporations exploited the pay-for-play system to win favors from city hall. While this list shows the ten worst offenders, Sightline discovered that 22 of the biggest corporate donors won $84 million in contracts from the city of Seattle between 2013 and 2015, in return for donating just $28,000 to candidates for municipal elections and lobbying.


(snip)


http://usuncut.com/politics/seattle-wins-publicly-financed-elections-i-122/



Kudos to Seattle.
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
HISTORIC: Koch Brothers Lose Big, Seattle Votes Big Money Out of Politics (Original Post) Uncle Joe Nov 2015 OP
Outstanding! Way to go Seattle. think Nov 2015 #1
Seattle's media doesn't like this prop just like Oregon's media LIKED prop 90 for open primaries... cascadiance Nov 2015 #2
Several parts of this law are unconstitutional Cicada Nov 2015 #3
So proud of my hometown....... dixiegrrrrl Nov 2015 #4
I didn't know you were from Seattle. Uncle Joe Nov 2015 #5
Born and raised in the Pac. NW dixiegrrrrl Nov 2015 #10
Very good news! blue neen Nov 2015 #6
I Hope Portland or Eugene will try a similar measure. Duckfan Nov 2015 #7
K&R nt Live and Learn Nov 2015 #8
Recommend. nt Zorra Nov 2015 #9
 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
2. Seattle's media doesn't like this prop just like Oregon's media LIKED prop 90 for open primaries...
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 11:02 PM
Nov 2015

... in 2014 election. They don't like a threat to the system that takes away the KILLING they make on political ads that inundate our system that public financing and its rules would do that would take away their way to profiteer from the corrupt system we have had. Look here at this Seattle Times editorial complaining about it.

http://www.seattletimes.com/opinion/editorials/big-money-behind-initiative-122-contradicts-its-purpose/

Look at this Oregonian editorial trying to promote prop 90 last election that lost every county in the state to a wiser public that saw through the crap that open primary "reform" would give us here. Even the prop giving undocumented residents drivers's licenses did better when winning Multnomah County in Portland area.

http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2014/10/measure_90_for_congress_editor.html

It is good that Seattle folk did the same thing that Oregonians did and ignored the attempts by the local media to keep corrupt money politics in place and take them down a notch!

Maybe we in Oregon can also join Washington in voting in socialists like Kshama Sawant, who endorsed this prop, a $15 minimum wage, etc. like we recently did with legalizing marijuana too. People just need to make sure that they don't take pot in the car with them when driving back and forth from Portland to Vancouver across the river. That still is illegal even if that amount of pot might be legal on either side of the state line.

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
3. Several parts of this law are unconstitutional
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 11:08 PM
Nov 2015

A corporation which hires lobbyists can not do certain things. That violates the right to petition govt. There are other problems.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
10. Born and raised in the Pac. NW
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 12:28 PM
Nov 2015

Lived in Seattle off and on for most of my life, plus lived in other parts of the state.
My great aunts took me to see movies in the marvelous theaters in Seattle, when I was as young as 5.
Went to "U of DubaU" all thru the 70's ( now, THERE was a great time).
Family still lives up there.

I was rather envious of all that sunshine you got this summer.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»HISTORIC: Koch Brothers L...