Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stuart G

(38,439 posts)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 08:47 AM Nov 2015

Easiest Explanation of Democratic Socialism.."Something We Already Have"

Last edited Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:35 AM - Edit history (2)

Explain with examples:....but...keep it simple please..

Water Departments that provide water to all
Fire Departments that provide service for all ....(except where the assholes have privatized it)
Police Departments.
Street and Sanitation Departments...provide flushing service for your toilets (don't want an outhouse do you?) and fixing the streets..and lights for the streets..also put in sidewalks.
public parks
b]....libraries for all
.....Inspection and Regulation of Food try to prevent food spread diseases
Regulation of how cars are made ...seat belts, crumple zones, airbags lots of safety devices. that save thousands of lives a year..for anyone who drives or sits in a car...
public education..free...k -12 for all
air traffic control for all planes flying
public regulation of electric and gas rates..(explain it would be much cheaper if govt owned but there is regulation..
public health departments that try to prevent disease..

Many more...but many aspects of "Democratic Socialism" already exist...sure..the government does not own the railroads, but in many cities it provides transportation. The government does not produce the gasoline, but it does regulate how it is made so there is less pollution and filth..(unleaded gas for example) and on and on and on.....and this is also important...ask your so called conservative friends if they would like to live without those services that the government provides? Then ...they will understand......It isn't radical or communism..it is already here... and tell them .."Thank G-d it is"... Oh...and one more idea...this isn't "rocket science", it is exactly what it is.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Easiest Explanation of Democratic Socialism.."Something We Already Have" (Original Post) Stuart G Nov 2015 OP
Not quite upaloopa Nov 2015 #1
The regulations and services that are expressed in OP attempt to control capitalism. Stuart G Nov 2015 #2
He would still do better than Hillary. Dawgs Nov 2015 #3
That kind thinking scares the shit out of me. It just makes no damn sense! upaloopa Nov 2015 #5
What doesn't make sense? Dawgs Nov 2015 #12
Democratic Socialists....are nothing more than Socialists that believe in Elections VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #4
Nope..not in my opinion... Stuart G Nov 2015 #6
Your opinion doesn't count... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #7
Sorry,......... my opinion does count..!!! (did you really say that???} Stuart G Nov 2015 #9
No you do not get your own version of truth.... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #11
The U.S. military is a socialist paradise! B Calm Nov 2015 #8
Yep...you are correct..!!!!!!!!! Stuart G Nov 2015 #10

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
1. Not quite
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:02 AM
Nov 2015

Democratic Socialists believe that both the economy and society should be run democratically to meet human needs, not to make profits for a few .......
http://www.dsausa.org/

As we are unlikely to see an immediate end to capitalism tomorrow, DSA fights for reforms today that will weaken the power of corporations and increase the power of working people.
http://www.dsausa.org/about_dsa


Democratic socialist would like to see the end of capitalism. Now just imagine if you will Bernie is in the general election. The repubs tell the country with a half billion dollars worth of ads that Bernie wants to get rid of our way of life and turn this country into a socialist state.

You can kiss a liberal Supreme Court good by for the next forty years.

I will not argue the merits of Democrat Socialism here but if we try and bring it about in the 2016 election it will only put us in the hands of conservatives for rest of our lifetimes.


For the record I was a member of DSA for a number of years.

Stuart G

(38,439 posts)
2. The regulations and services that are expressed in OP attempt to control capitalism.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:09 AM
Nov 2015

It will not be ended, but it can be regulated in a stronger way. Through regulation we can control some of the excess and greed that exist in the system. If we change the definition, and we can to something that is totally acceptable, then maybe new regulations on pollution and in other areas will be much easier to be enacted. Educating the total electorate on a humane "form of socialism" won't work, but educating the public on the needs of government to regulate the excesses of capitalism, and,...(we have already done that successfully in many areas..it ain't new, and it is necessary) will work..

Sure, there are definitions and definitions..but use what works and more important, what people clearly understand and agree on.

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
3. He would still do better than Hillary.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:15 AM
Nov 2015

His still more of a populist than any other candidate and many Indys would vote for him over the Republican or Hillary.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
5. That kind thinking scares the shit out of me. It just makes no damn sense!
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:17 AM
Nov 2015

That is why Bernie supporters turn me off. Your just so fucking blind to reality! Your belief in your utopian fantasy could destroy the demographic advantage we have now. The states are already turning right wing and you want to give the federal government over to them too!

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
12. What doesn't make sense?
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 10:57 AM
Nov 2015

That Bernie is a populist or that he will do better with Independents?

Do you care to actually show me how Hillary will do better when her disapproval's are so high, she's thought of as a liar and distrustful, and she creates a lot less enthusiasm than most other candidates?

Or, are you just going to say nothing?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
4. Democratic Socialists....are nothing more than Socialists that believe in Elections
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:17 AM
Nov 2015

Democratic Socialists still do not believe in ANY form of Capitalism and want no private means of production....

as opposed to Socialist Democrats that believe in Regulated Capital (a balance between Capital and Labor), a strong Social Safety Net and a Welfare State.

Stuart G

(38,439 posts)
6. Nope..not in my opinion...
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:20 AM
Nov 2015

..I believe that we can accept "private means of productions" if profits, work safety, worker's rights are regulated. That is what I believe, and it will be accepted if that definition is utilized....Regulate profits to what society believes is a "fair level" That can be voted on and totally accepted by most in the population. Then, you don't need to own the means of production, it would be fairly regulated.................and yes, companies would still make a profit, and guess what? many are more than satisfied with 10 percent profit...and they survive...It is well known that the grocery business exists on less than 5 percent, some say 3 percent. And it is still privately owned. As much as Wall Mart is totally hated by all here, (and I understand that) it exits on less than 5 percent profit..If all companies existed on 5 percent, society would be much better off. Some pharmaceutical's get 25 to 30 percent after all expenses by charging huge mark-ups on highly needed drugs.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
7. Your opinion doesn't count...
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:22 AM
Nov 2015

No you can't ....because if you do...you are then a Socialist Democrat not a Democratic Socialist.

Democratic socialism is a political ideology advocating a democratic political system alongside a socialist economic system, involving a combination of political democracy (usually multi-party representative democracy) with social ownership of the means of production.


Democratic socialism rejects the social democratic view of reform through state intervention within capitalism, seeing capitalism as inherently incompatible with the democratic values of freedom, equality, and solidarity. Democratic socialists believe that the economic contradictions inherent to capitalism can only be solved by transitioning from capitalism to socialism, by superseding private property with some form of social ownership, with any attempt to address the economic contradictions of capitalism through reforms only being likely to generate more problems elsewhere in the capitalist economy.[5][6]


Democratic socialism is usually distinguished from both the Soviet model of a centralized economy and social democracy.[2] A distinction is also made between democratic socialism and social democracy in that the former is committed to systemic transformation of the economy while the latter is not.[3] However, "democratic socialism" is sometimes improperly used as a synonym for social democracy, where "social democracy" usually refers to support for political democracy, regulation of the capitalist economy, and a welfare state.[4]

Stuart G

(38,439 posts)
9. Sorry,......... my opinion does count..!!! (did you really say that???}
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:32 AM
Nov 2015

Definitions can be changed, and made friendly... Most people easily accept the regulations aspect of socialism..The means of production are not owned completely in other countries who are so called socialist. You buy a car in Denmark, and it is still made by a capitalistic company...Give it a break..We make it easy to understand and accept, then we win...and I can define it as I like..You don't have to accept it, that is ok with me..definitions change over the course of time and we all know it. A computer ain't a computer as we knew it in the 50s and 60s.... It ain't the same...thank goodness

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
11. No you do not get your own version of truth....
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:34 AM
Nov 2015

They HAVE definitions...those are the CURRENT definitions....look them up!

You might want to make up a new one....since the one you are trying to create....already exists and has its own definition.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Easiest Explanation of De...