Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:42 PM Nov 2015

"Anonymous’s much-hyped “Operation KKK” finally released a list ..... "

(Note to grammar police at Wa Post .... Anonymous' much ....)

Anonymous’s KKK ‘leak’ targets the elusive online world of white nationalism
By Abby Ohlheiser November 5 at 7:15 PM

After days of inaccuracies, confusing reports, and false starts, Anonymous’s much-hyped “Operation KKK” finally released a list of — if not the promised 1,000 — hundreds of names and social media accounts, many of which appear to have clear connections to the Ku Klux Klan, or other white supremacy groups.

The Pastebin document was distributed via Twitter on Thursday afternoon. It contains hundreds of links to individual Facebook accounts, some of which had already been removed in the days before the promised leak. As the list began to circulate, even more of the linked accounts began to vanish.

The list includes many already known Klan members, and many others with public online profiles that clearly indicate an affiliation with a white supremacy organization.

The data dump was one of the most widely hyped operations in the history of Anonymous, after the amorphous Internet collective promised last week to unmask about 1,000 members of the Ku Klux Klan, or their associates. But as is characteristic of the sometimes chaotic, leaderless group, things didn’t go quite as according to plan: ...........


3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Anonymous’s much-hyped “Operation KKK” finally released a list ..... " (Original Post) L. Coyote Nov 2015 OP
The names that matter will never be on a list, the pricks are too smart for that. randys1 Nov 2015 #1
You can't trust anonymous posters on the Internet. randome Nov 2015 #2
+1 Blue_Tires Nov 2015 #3
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
2. You can't trust anonymous posters on the Internet.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:57 PM
Nov 2015
Gabriella Coleman, an author and arguably the best-known expert on Anonymous, had a mixed reaction to the results of the operation shortly after it went live. She was impressed with the group’s “town hall” discussion on race and representation that took place on Wednesday, as a companion to the information dump. To her, that online conversation demonstrated that there were “thoughtful” individuals with experience working on racial justice issues involved in the operation, she said. But “since the data is impossible to verify, it does also make me a little suspicious as well,” she wrote in an e-mail. “Hard for me to wrap my head around this one.”

Although Anonymous has a long history of taking up causes that might align with grassroots racial and social justice issues, it also has a long history of doxxing the wrong people, often undermining the group’s own intentions by targeting innocent people with vigilante tactics. Those include incorrectly identifying a man as the officer who fatally shot Michael Brown on Aug. 9, 2014, in Ferguson, Mo.

[hr][font color="blue"][center]Precision and concision. That's the game.[/center][/font][hr]
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Anonymous’s much-hy...