Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,090 posts)
Sun May 27, 2012, 09:34 PM May 2012

Rolling Stone: Why Private Equity Firms Like Bain Really Are the Worst of Capitalism



Why Private Equity Firms Like Bain Really Are the Worst of Capitalism
POSTED: May 23, 2:35 PM ET | By Josh Kosman


By placing his career at Bain Capital at the center of his presidential campaign, former buyout artist Mitt Romney has put the private equity industry on trial.

About time.

Romney wants us to believe that critics of private equity are against capitalism. They’re not. They’re against a predatory system created and perpetuated by Wall Street solely to pump its own profits.

Defenders of private equity say firms like Bain, which Romney co-founded in 1984, exist to build businesses, creating jobs and prosperity all the while. "We started Staples, we started the Sports Authority, we started Bright Horizons children centers," Romney said at one of the GOP presidential debates last year. "Heck, we even started a steel mill in a farm field in Indiana. And that steel mill operates today and employs a lot of people." ................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/national-affairs/why-private-equity-firms-like-bain-really-are-the-worst-of-capitalism-20120523#ixzz1w7k5YOfC




13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rolling Stone: Why Private Equity Firms Like Bain Really Are the Worst of Capitalism (Original Post) marmar May 2012 OP
Off to the Greatest. Nt xchrom May 2012 #1
This is a must click. LiberalAndProud May 2012 #2
Is Rolling Stone calling the Corporate Raider a liar? Sounds like it. aint_no_life_nowhere May 2012 #3
It is what it is. LiberalAndProud May 2012 #5
Kicking, because this is what it is all about. nt flying rabbit May 2012 #4
One of the best articles yet on Bain Capital and Mitt Romney... kentuck May 2012 #6
k&r... spanone May 2012 #7
So glad to see this get attention KT2000 May 2012 #8
Silly comparison, I know... but those piercing eyes! qb May 2012 #9
Again I say if corporations are people - Bain Capital is Dexter Morgan. Initech May 2012 #10
K & R Quantess May 2012 #11
Here's what they did Warpy May 2012 #12
K & R Scurrilous May 2012 #13

LiberalAndProud

(12,799 posts)
2. This is a must click.
Sun May 27, 2012, 10:17 PM
May 2012
The companies Romney holds up as successes – Staples, Sports Authority et al. – were not Bain private equity deals; they were venture capital investments in companies that Bain neither owned nor ran. All well and good: Venture capital is a good thing – essential for funding the growth of new and developing companies. But Romney didn't make his fortune through venture capital­; he made it through private equity – and private equity, as President Obama pointed out this week, is a very different proposition.


kentuck

(111,110 posts)
6. One of the best articles yet on Bain Capital and Mitt Romney...
Sun May 27, 2012, 11:44 PM
May 2012

When they brag about Staples and other successes, they are not talking about private equity, they are talking about "venture capital". The author does a good job differentiating.

KT2000

(20,586 posts)
8. So glad to see this get attention
Mon May 28, 2012, 12:38 AM
May 2012

a very very few pocket the proceeds - with government assistance - for sending the work overseas and/or shutting them completely.

Warpy

(111,335 posts)
12. Here's what they did
Mon May 28, 2012, 07:09 PM
May 2012

In the past, vulture capitalists used to weed out the weak and that was probably a good thing. However, Bain didn't pick on the weak, it picked on weak and strong alike.

1. Find a company, any company, that is possible to purchase.

2. Purchase the company.

3. Borrow against the company, including its pension plan.

4. Send the borrowed cash offshore to stash it, or use it to
buy another company.

5. Sell off the most profitable parts of the company, if
possible, and decimate the workforce to squeeze out
anything left.

6. Cut the company loose to declare bankruptcy.

7. Watch the money roll in from the offshore accounts.

8. Congratulate oneself for being "smart."

In the meantime, displaced workers and shafted stockholders alike were more likely to end up living on the taxpayer dollar while Bain paid little to no tax on its stashed profit. Every company they destroyed made this country just a little poorer.

Hey, it's really easy to get ahead if you throw out the rules of common decency and fair play, if you have no regard for anything but your own profit, and if you buy enough people at the SEC to look the other way. Limbaugh will pull the wool over the eyes of anybody stupid enough to listen to him and I'm sorry to say a lot of people are stupid enough to listen to him.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rolling Stone: Why Privat...