General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHang Onto Your Wallets: Negative Interest, the War on Cash, and the $10 Trillion Bail-in
By Ellen Brown
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Hang-Onto-Your-Wallets-Ne-by-Ellen-Brown-Bail-in_Interest-rate-Manipulation_Public-Banking-151121-631.html
In uncertain times, "cash is king," but central bankers are systematically moving to eliminate that option. Is it really about stimulating the economy? Or is there some deeper, darker threat afoot?
Remember those old ads showing a senior couple lounging on a warm beach, captioned "Let your money work for you"? Or the scene in Mary Poppins where young Michael is being advised to put his tuppence in the bank, so that it can compound into "all manner of private enterprise," including "bonds, chattels, dividends, shares, shipyards, amalgamations . . . ."?
<snip>
Again, to the ordinary observer, this would seem to signal that negative interest rates won't work and the approach needs to be abandoned. But not to our undaunted central bankers, who have chosen instead to plug this hole in their leaky theory by moving to eliminate cash as an option. If your only choice is to keep your money in a digital account in a bank and spend it with a bank card or credit card or checks, negative interest can be imposed with impunity. This is already happening in Sweden, and other countries are close behind. As reported on Wolfstreet.com:
The War on Cash is advancing on all fronts. One region that has hogged the headlines with its war against physical currency is Scandinavia. Sweden became the first country to enlist its own citizens as largely willing guinea pigs in a dystopian economic experiment: negative interest rates in a cashless society. As Credit Suisse reports, no matter where you go or what you want to purchase, you will find a small ubiquitous sign saying "Vi hanterar ej kontanter" ("We don't accept cash" . . . .
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Much more in this thought provoking article.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)I would imagine very few Americans carry cash anymore. It's a past custom and becoming more rare every year.
JEB
(4,748 posts)and about half of my transactions, buying or selling are in cash. Real street level capitalism is done with cash.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Of course I never do those activities so probably not aware of it.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Lots of income not being reported, taxes not being paid, and there is a small discount for using cash.
In fact, many small merchants around here will not take credit cards at all.
Which is why France, as an example, is forbidding cash transactions of certain sizes.
France has also banned bank withdrawals of more than 2,000 francs. They started limiting withdrawals at 10,000 francs, have lowered it every few months.
Once a society goes cashless, the Gov. sees and controls all transactions.
and money becomes worthless, essentially.
Tis a Fed bank dream.
questionseverything
(9,660 posts)Once a society goes cashless, the Gov. sees and controls all transactions.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
this
tracing every transaction was what the patriot act was all about
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Ever watch Minority Report?
Plus, with no money our dollars are actually debt instruments, look at one)
the Gov't/banks can do what it has been doing for some time...creating money out of thin air.
just zeros and ones... binary money.
Just as they "value" derivatives, which are actually future bets, contracts that have no actual cash value until they are put into play.
Yet Bank of America got the Gov't to agree to insure them in FDIC accounts.
mathematic
(1,440 posts)I always suspected that anti-Fed paranoia was rooted in some bizarre place that time forgot.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)France has banned any transaction over 1,000 Euros from using physical cash.
Spain has already banned cash transactions over 2,500.
Uruguay has banned cash transactions over $5,000
Rex
(65,616 posts)carry cash.
Waldorf
(654 posts)$100 in my wallet or $100 in my checking account.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Do you think both groups live the same lifestyle? They don't.
Waldorf
(654 posts)to have a debit card?
Rex
(65,616 posts)Or sometimes they don't have a bank account so no debit card. Just nothing left over to spend after the monthly bills are paid.
JEB
(4,748 posts)never used one. Seems like a bunch of bullshit.
Rex
(65,616 posts)'Cash is king' anyone saying otherwise has no clue what it is like in the real world imo.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)for $100 cash. I would not have accepted a check because I could have been robbed so easily. It enabled me to quickly finish cleaning out my garage and quickly raise a little cash that I need to tide me over right now. I could deposit it in my checking account, but that would require a 15 mile trip to the credit union. Instead, I'll spend it directly at the supermarket and to get my oil&filter changed.
If they (we) are stupid enough to go down that road, I hope communities come up with an alternate system (such as have taken over in Greece) so that we can continue to function as a community on a day-to-day basis.
Response to Rex (Reply #4)
yeoman6987 This message was self-deleted by its author.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)I discontinued credit cars a dozen years ago.
Everywhere I go I see people still paying with cash.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Not unusual around here, either.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Negative interest rates = deflation.
In a fractional reserve system, banks create money by loaning it to people. Why borrow money when it'll be worth less tomorrow?
No loans=no new money. No new money=no capital to service existing debt.
People are endlessly creative. If banks force negative interest on their depositors while maintaining high interest on their loans, it will spur interest in alternative currencies.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Governments would very much like such ledgers to exist because they could view everything that is taking place financially in real time, including ability to evaluate net worth, patterns of spending and of earned and unearned income, and of course, an instant assessment of all taxable activities.
his is not a dreamy idea. Blythe Masters, the JP Morgan architect of organized market trading of modern asset backed securities like mortgage backed securities and collateralized debt obligations is leading a new business effort to develop a universal cashless system. Not only is she gathering significant investor interest, but the Federal Reserve and various US Government agencies have become keenly interested in the potential usefulness and efficiencies of a universal cashless system.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-11-21/former-senior-aide-four-presidents-outlines-how-and-why-elites-want-end-physical-cas
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)The "tax payers won't ever have to bail out banks again" was pure subterfuge. We'll still have to bail them out, but through bail-ins, such as have taken place in Greece.
The giant Too-Big-To-Jail banksters are on the hook for trillions in derivatives. When they blow, they want our money trapped in the banks for them to confiscate.
It really is that simple. Just look at what they did to Greece. That is the plan for us. Cashless is just the first preparatory step.
Read the last 2 paragraphs of the OP article. That is what it is all about.