Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
Sun Nov 22, 2015, 02:29 PM Nov 2015

Question about bomb threats

Can anyone recall a situation in which someone made a telephone call stating that a bomb was at a location, and a bomb was actually detonated or found there?

This business of "the building was evacuated because a bomb threat was phoned in" seems like an open invitation to cause disruptions at very low cost.

Who goes through the trouble of constructing and planting a bomb, and then makes a telephone call to conveniently state where it is?

Clearly suicide bombers don't do it, and vehicular bombs arrive shortly before detonation.

So I'm wondering why these types of telephone threats are given any credence, unless there are some number of reported bombs which turn out to be bombs.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Question about bomb threats (Original Post) jberryhill Nov 2015 OP
Agreed. But for insurance purposes alone, it would be considered negligent onecaliberal Nov 2015 #1
I remember when I worked at a big box retailer... 47of74 Nov 2015 #2
Please...they do it all the time Rex Nov 2015 #3
Yes, it happens. Lee-Lee Nov 2015 #4
How often is the general public told one way or the other? PETRUS Nov 2015 #5
I seem to recall that something along these lines COLGATE4 Nov 2015 #6
The IRA I could understand jberryhill Nov 2015 #7
The first thing that came to my mind was also the IRA. Hassin Bin Sober Nov 2015 #8
One instance comes to mind Heeeeers Johnny Nov 2015 #9
Well... ryan_cats Nov 2015 #10
You're right. They should be ignored. cherokeeprogressive Nov 2015 #11

onecaliberal

(32,864 posts)
1. Agreed. But for insurance purposes alone, it would be considered negligent
Sun Nov 22, 2015, 02:43 PM
Nov 2015

To date nothing or essentially ignore a bomb threat. Someone who wants to plant a bomb and kill people will not call it in or warn anyone.

 

47of74

(18,470 posts)
2. I remember when I worked at a big box retailer...
Sun Nov 22, 2015, 02:47 PM
Nov 2015

...dealing with such calls was part of the training everyone received - such as cutting all power to the store, shutting the registers, and so on.

I think it's more a case of better safe than sorry. You don't want to ignore something that could hurt someone then be that one time where it's true - it'd be lawsuit city then.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
3. Please...they do it all the time
Sun Nov 22, 2015, 02:50 PM
Nov 2015

on the TVEE! So it must be true in real life right? They can't put anything on TVEE that is not true. I read that on the Internets.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
4. Yes, it happens.
Sun Nov 22, 2015, 02:56 PM
Nov 2015

This is the most recent example I can find:

http://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/bomb-left-in-belfast-could-have-caused-carnage-psni-warns-1.2198320

It seems counter intuitive for a bomber to give a warning, but there are several reasons a warning may be given. The bomber could have second thoughts after placing a bomb and not want to return, or it could be that multiple parties are involved and one isn't fully on board to they give a warning.

PETRUS

(3,678 posts)
5. How often is the general public told one way or the other?
Sun Nov 22, 2015, 03:23 PM
Nov 2015

Years ago there was a bomb threat phoned in for a flight I was about to take. They towed the plane to a distant runway, spread the luggage out on the tarmac and ferried us out there one by one and had us unpack our bags in the presence of several heavily armed men with dogs. Another team with dogs searched the plane. When that was done they loaded us up and we flew. There was never an announcement about whether or not a bomb was found and I never heard/read any news about it later in spite of going out of my way to search for information.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
6. I seem to recall that something along these lines
Sun Nov 22, 2015, 03:31 PM
Nov 2015

happened in Northern Ireland with the I.R.A., although my memory about this may be faulty. Certainly your observation about the pointlessness of doing this makes a lot of sense.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
7. The IRA I could understand
Sun Nov 22, 2015, 07:33 PM
Nov 2015

Someone mentioned an example of that above.

If there was one, I figured it would be the IRA or perhaps a South American rebel group targeting military or police in particular, rather than a mass terror attack for the terror value per se.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,330 posts)
8. The first thing that came to my mind was also the IRA.
Sun Nov 22, 2015, 07:40 PM
Nov 2015

And some left wing radicals here in the 60s and 70s.

Heeeeers Johnny

(423 posts)
9. One instance comes to mind
Sun Nov 22, 2015, 07:45 PM
Nov 2015

Took place at an abortion clinic; person called about a bomb inside the building, people evacuated and
police/fire were called, bomb was actually outside the building when detonated.

IIRC, the method was borrowed from the IRA (if you can't get the bomb to the people... get the people to the bomb).

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
11. You're right. They should be ignored.
Sun Nov 22, 2015, 08:22 PM
Nov 2015

I'm thinking the information taken in the phone call shouldn't even be written down. Maybe even hang up on the caller when a possible bombing is mentioned.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question about bomb threa...