Destruction of evidence? Accessory after the fact? Conspiracy? Lots of juicy charges to file if anybody in the DA's office gave a shit.

A lawyer I heard speak said Burger King had another video camera recording the inside of the restaurant. It showed five or six cops in blue shirts coming in and working the tape machine and erasing the outside video. They forgot to look for any other cameras.

Anyone else hear that? I can't find corroboration online.

to have a security camera filming inside the office, where the safe is also kept.

Which is some coincidence, seeing how at that exact time the video from the BK went bad.

Maybe it was some kind of freak phenomenon, like blue lightning.

Following the example of Jose Rodriguez of the CIA, the Chicago PD obviously made the calculation that they'd rather face the penalty for destroying evidence than the penalty for what the evidence showed.

Anyone know what happened to Jose Rodriguez for destroying 92 tapes of CIA torture?

Head of Ops, something noble and worthwhile for those qualified to serve above the law.

But I think they might have made a real frowny face when they told him of his promotion. So, lesson learned.

Also we cannot depend on police unions to shore in their people nor does the local DA in these areas. That makes it real hard to go after crooked cops imo.

I wish we had the FBI investigate EVERY police shooting.

to investigate as a mandatory action. I bet it might curb some of this horrible violence by local PDs. We kind of need a reason to have the DHS imo...this would be a great cause to keep the agency busy.