Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pampango

(24,692 posts)
Tue May 29, 2012, 07:32 AM May 2012

A letter to the good people of Iowa: Are you crazy? (re. republican party platform)

Dear Iowa,

I used to think you were a pretty straight-ahead place, what with all that flat land and healthy vegetables and honest living. I mean, Iowans rejected slavery 20 years before the Civil War and they approved interracial marriage a century before the U.S. Supreme Court. Homosexuality was decriminalized almost 30 years before the 2003 Lawrence vs. Texas decision did so nationwide. Today, control of the state’s Legislature is split between Democrats and Republicans and, a few characters aside, it is not known for political extremism. Like the corn it produces in such copious amounts, Iowa generally seemed a healthy and sensible place.

That idea of the state ended for me last week when I read the proposed platform released by the platform committee of the Republican Party of Iowa.

Are you people totally insane?

The platform is absolutely thick with ideas from the extreme right, lunatic conspiracy theories, and barely concealed hatred for President Obama and anything that smacks of multiculturalism. It sneers at science, is down on poor people, and despises, really despises, the United Nations.

Here’s a sampling of the deep-thinking goals of the Iowa GOP:

Require candidates for president to prove that they are “natural born citizens,” beginning with the 2012 election. After all, non-citizens serving as president have been a longstanding problem in American politics.

Reject the “claims” of global warming, which are “based on fraudulent, inaccurate information” and pushed by people using “extremist scare tactics.” The Iowa GOP “recognizes” that policies and laws designed to combat global warming are really “a plan to take our freedoms and liberties away.”

Oppose “the diabolical collusion of the United Nations” in promoting its Agenda 21, a non-binding global sustainability plan signed by President George H.W. Bush and the leaders of 177 other nations in 1992. Like the Republican National Committee, the Iowa GOP apparently believes Agenda 21 is part of an effort to impose global political control on the U.S.

Allow Iowa to “nullify” any federal laws it doesn’t like. Nullification was a failed legal argument made by opponents of the civil rights movement.

Eliminate the Federal Reserve Act and implement a “sound commodity-backed currency” with a gold or silver standard.

Fight the North American Union, “which would do away with our borders and sovereignty, and … [battle] the Amero, which would do away with our currency.” Although there actually are no secret plans to merge Mexico, the United States and Canada into a single entity — and replace our dollars with “Ameros” — that hasn’t stopped the conspiracy theorists.

• In the same vein, “oppose so-called ‘One-World Government.’ ”

Entirely eliminate the departments of Agriculture, Education, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Health and Human Services, Energy, Interior, Labor and Commerce, along with the Transportation Safety Administration, the Food and Drug Administration, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Endowment for the Arts, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

• Likewise, abolish the Internal Revenue Service and repeal the 16th Amendment, which legalized the federal income tax.

Require judges to instruct jurors that in addition to judging cases, they may pass on the law at issue. Commonly known as “jury nullification,” this is a highly controversial notion that is embraced by the radical right.

Oppose federal anti-bullying legislation because, after all, “students have the right and responsibility to stand up for themselves.”

Pass a “stand your ground” law, like the one that many believe led to the death of Trayvon Martin in Sanford, Fla. By a large margin, most prosecutors and police oppose such laws, which make prosecuting many killings difficult.

• Allow parents to refuse to have their children immunized.

• Reject the teaching of multiculturalism.

• Only teach evolution as a theory, along with creationism.

• Repeal compulsory school attendance laws.

• Outlaw pornography.

• Impose “more severe consequences” for convicted juvenile offenders.

• Eliminate the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration, which oversees job safety.

• Repeal smoking bans because, as the platform statement asserts, “We believe this to be an issue of liberty.” Air quality in all businesses should be left up to owners’ “freedom to choose.”

• Repeal all hate crime laws.

• Oppose the imposition of Shariah, or Islamic religious law, in the United States, along with any other foreign or “United Nations Law.”

• Build a fence along the entire U.S. border with Mexico.

• Eliminate no-fault divorce laws and require “good cause” to get a divorce.

• End minimum wage laws.

• Oppose abortion and reject the Supreme Court’s decision authorizing it. Encourage adoption and aid to unwed mothers — but only if every dollar of support comes from the private sector.


http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20120529/OPINION/305290021/-1/SPORTS12/Another-View-letter-good-people-Iowa-you-crazy-

Thanks to the Iowa republican party for providing us with such a convenient list of current craziness and right-wing paranoia. You can't go far wrong just taking the opposite position on every issue that the Iowa repubs have taken a stance on in their platform. I wonder how many of these will be adopted by the national party.
41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A letter to the good people of Iowa: Are you crazy? (re. republican party platform) (Original Post) pampango May 2012 OP
SMH Mr Dixon May 2012 #1
As an Iowan, I have no clue who these people are... Frustratedlady May 2012 #2
sadly, I am an Iowan and have met many of these folks rurallib May 2012 #3
yuck...muscantine madrchsod May 2012 #7
Lived in Muscatine for 2 years...worst decade of my life! bullwinkle428 May 2012 #14
Sadly, some of these folks are relatives, progressoid May 2012 #21
Every state has them. It's just amazing that they have gained (or been granted) access to pampango May 2012 #8
You've never lived in the western part of the state -- the ones who elect Steve King. shcrane71 May 2012 #16
I can't wait to vote against Steve King. Thav May 2012 #24
My mother calls him King-Sh**. shcrane71 May 2012 #34
Mouth meeting keyboard here... Surya Gayatri May 2012 #4
We've always had crazies efilon May 2012 #5
during the 20`s and early 30`s my grandfather was in the grange movement in western iowa madrchsod May 2012 #6
I wonder how many Iowa residents will ever have a chance to read this platform... LongTomH May 2012 #9
Can't this be copied in a letter Chipper Chat May 2012 #10
Ron Paul libertarians had a big hand in that, right? Maeve May 2012 #11
That's their platform, every word of it. Prison Planet keeps them 'informed.' freshwest May 2012 #40
It's ironic that they want to ban Shariah Law, but their entire platform Dash87 May 2012 #12
What we have here are the manifestos of same group bonniebgood May 2012 #13
re:A letter to the good people of Iowa: Are you crazy? (re. republican party platform) allan01 May 2012 #15
Promoting ignorance The Wizard May 2012 #17
I was reading my local western Iowa paper this morning and saw a letter from a local resident libinnyandia May 2012 #18
Why in IOWA are they calling for abolition of the Department of Agriculture? Jim Lane May 2012 #19
Farmers voted for Reagan in big numbers precisely because he promised to eliminate subsidies! ieoeja May 2012 #33
Wonder if the National GOP platform won't be the same. sinkingfeeling May 2012 #20
Why not encapsulate the whole thing in one sentence? dickthegrouch May 2012 #22
I wish we could find a plot of land somewhere and give it to these assholes LynneSin May 2012 #26
I recommend Bikini Atoll Woody Woodpecker May 2012 #27
Better yet Zalatix May 2012 #31
I'd go for that idea. smirkymonkey May 2012 #38
Jury Nullification noamnety May 2012 #23
THese people would shit their pants in fear if they lived in a country with these laws LynneSin May 2012 #25
There have always been crackpots, kooks and paranoids out there. hifiguy May 2012 #28
Man, that's a lot of crazy for one document! caseymoz May 2012 #29
Jury nullification can also be used to save pesky brown people from courtroom lynchings. Zalatix May 2012 #30
How much of this is really new? hfojvt May 2012 #32
I bet the Republican Platform looks similar in lots of states. cyberswede May 2012 #35
You know it. GoCubsGo May 2012 #36
• Build a fence along the entire U.S. border with Mexico. mercuryblues May 2012 #37
K & R Scurrilous May 2012 #39
Jury nullification is NOT a radical right wing notion, nor should it be. Sirveri May 2012 #41

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)
2. As an Iowan, I have no clue who these people are...
Tue May 29, 2012, 08:02 AM
May 2012

As I've said before, I have never met any of these people and can only guess they are King Repugs on Koch.

rurallib

(62,423 posts)
3. sadly, I am an Iowan and have met many of these folks
Tue May 29, 2012, 08:11 AM
May 2012

Muscatine seems to be a large enclave 18th century minds.

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
7. yuck...muscantine
Tue May 29, 2012, 08:44 AM
May 2012

a city no one really cares about other than driving through it if that absolutely have to

pampango

(24,692 posts)
8. Every state has them. It's just amazing that they have gained (or been granted) access to
Tue May 29, 2012, 08:46 AM
May 2012

the levers of power in a moderate state such as Iowa. Party platforms are often ignored in practice, but teabaggers have shown the ability in many states to get legislatures and governors to go along with their agenda.

shcrane71

(1,721 posts)
16. You've never lived in the western part of the state -- the ones who elect Steve King.
Tue May 29, 2012, 09:29 AM
May 2012

These people are mean and diabolical. I have a cousin who was a total bully as kid, and she married a big time
Republican. At family gatherings, she likes to talk about her latest read which is usually some Ann Coulture rubbish. No one ever disagrees with her, because she's a bully. I have on occasion disagreed by saying such things as "Global warming is real, and agreed upon by over ninety percent of scientist." Her response, "I know. I can't believe I'm getting bullied by my own family." She's such a victim.

Oh and thank you Dubya Bush admin for faith-based funding. She was able to use those funds to take poor, inner-town kids from a small town in SW Iowa on a Canadian fishing trip (as well as all her kids and some friends, and their kids). Yep, your federal tax dollars hard at work.

Thav

(946 posts)
24. I can't wait to vote against Steve King.
Tue May 29, 2012, 10:29 AM
May 2012

Just can't wait. Most of my family will as well. All I need to do is get my grandparents to vote against him as well.

shcrane71

(1,721 posts)
34. My mother calls him King-Sh**.
Tue May 29, 2012, 11:59 AM
May 2012

Mom isn't very political, but she finds it almost impossible to say his name with the the obligatory sh** tacked on. He's such an embarrassment to the entire state.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
4. Mouth meeting keyboard here...
Tue May 29, 2012, 08:16 AM
May 2012


You know, something diabolical in me almost wishes they could implement this insanity.

How far will the rest of Iowa and the US allow them to go until the social fabric unravels and rips into civil war?

efilon

(167 posts)
5. We've always had crazies
Tue May 29, 2012, 08:24 AM
May 2012

It's just that like most of the country they have become crazier and more outspoken. Sad sad sad.

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
6. during the 20`s and early 30`s my grandfather was in the grange movement in western iowa
Tue May 29, 2012, 08:42 AM
May 2012

i have one of the speeches he gave and some of those very modern platforms are in the speech he gave. other platforms would have included by changing the language a bit.

he purchased the speech from a company from nebraska that sold speeches.

somethings never change do they...

LongTomH

(8,636 posts)
9. I wonder how many Iowa residents will ever have a chance to read this platform...
Tue May 29, 2012, 08:56 AM
May 2012

...before they go to the polls? If people around the country are aware of the real GOP agenda when they vote these crazies into office, this country is even more fucked up than I thought it was!

Dash87

(3,220 posts)
12. It's ironic that they want to ban Shariah Law, but their entire platform
Tue May 29, 2012, 09:03 AM
May 2012

is something from the 19th century.

bonniebgood

(943 posts)
13. What we have here are the manifestos of same group
Tue May 29, 2012, 09:12 AM
May 2012

who changes their name every thirty years. first (to my knowledge) kkk, ALEC, and now known
as the Kochbaggers. They are not in the closet anymore, after the election a black President.
I am reminded about what a SC Senator said (when I Think President Roosevelt invited Booker T. Washington, the first black to be invited to the White House). "now we have to kill 300 of them to let them know their place". We (USA) are headed toward a south Africa where a minority whites control 250 million people of color.
The Kochbaggers manifesto must be passed into law to let 250 million majority of their place.

allan01

(1,950 posts)
15. re:A letter to the good people of Iowa: Are you crazy? (re. republican party platform)
Tue May 29, 2012, 09:28 AM
May 2012

1: fedearl law suppercedes state law. and when will the repugs realise that ONLY juries can pass scentance, NOT judges. and what about mittens ( bleh) backgorund ??? as one poster said "sad" i hope we get more of us elected to end this lunacy .in regards to the open letter ,, kick and in the guise of a former late nite talk show host i used to like listening to ,"oh really??, and how will this balance the iowa state budget , educate our kids, help our disabled and seiniors , and provide transportation. ever since an adult and reading history of this party , i have seen one constant thread, obstructionsiom and exclusion. meh. not one has never had any decent idears.

libinnyandia

(1,374 posts)
18. I was reading my local western Iowa paper this morning and saw a letter from a local resident
Tue May 29, 2012, 09:50 AM
May 2012

claiming that Obama was the worst president in history- higher unemployment than during the Depression rcord debt and my first recation was - is there a competition for who's the craziest reader or maybe he's applying for a job at Fox News. The GOP here is crazy but probably not any more so than in a lot of other states. I think that Obama will carry Iowa and I hope that we can get rid of Steve King.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
19. Why in IOWA are they calling for abolition of the Department of Agriculture?
Tue May 29, 2012, 10:04 AM
May 2012

Wouldn't the end of federal price supports and other programs mean a huge financial hit to Iowa's farmers, and thus indirectly to the state's entire economy?

The more common pattern for RW nuts is to oppose almost everything the federal government does, but to make an exception for any program that benefits them or their constituents. I think of Bobby Jindal, Governor of Louisiana (which has no volcanoes), denouncing federal spending on volcano monitoring, but admitting that federal spending on studying the weather patterns in the Gulf of Mexico helped his state deal with Hurricane Katrina.

Instead of publicizing the whole list, I'd lean toward publicizing just the abolition of the Department of Agriculture, to make sure that plank doesn't get lost in the crowd.

 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
33. Farmers voted for Reagan in big numbers precisely because he promised to eliminate subsidies!
Tue May 29, 2012, 11:22 AM
May 2012

Subsidies then were granted to *not* grow crops for environmental reasons and to artificially keep comodity prices high. The Reagan loving farmers figured that if the subsidies were eliminated, then they could plant "fence row to fence row" and thereby make more money.

Of course, accepting subsidies was optional. I knew one farmer who did not accept the subsidies and planted fence row to fence row. He benefited from the higher prices caused by everyone else taking the subsidies. And he, like them, lost out when those prices crashed after the subsidies were eliminated.

"You've got to remember that these are just simple farmers. These are people of the land. The common clay of the {earth}. You know... morons." - Blazing Saddles, 1974


dickthegrouch

(3,174 posts)
22. Why not encapsulate the whole thing in one sentence?
Tue May 29, 2012, 10:14 AM
May 2012

"Secede from the US"

That is the ultimate effect of all these goals. Then we can allow anyone who wants to leave back into the rest of the country and give Pastor what's his name a demonstration of his prison for criminals (gays and lesbians) idea.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
26. I wish we could find a plot of land somewhere and give it to these assholes
Tue May 29, 2012, 10:31 AM
May 2012

These people aren't going to be happy until they have the country they want and honestly, most of us do not want to live in that place.

 

Woody Woodpecker

(562 posts)
27. I recommend Bikini Atoll
Tue May 29, 2012, 10:35 AM
May 2012

Far away enough, so uninhabitated, so perfect for Republicans to start as a cavemen and work their way up. No interference - Prime Directive.

 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
23. Jury Nullification
Tue May 29, 2012, 10:24 AM
May 2012

I don't think of that one as a right wing concept - I've always thought of it mainly as a tool of the left, to get around the ridiculous sentencing requirements for possession of pot, or to dismiss charges like protesting. Here's a thread I posted a while back with more info on it: http://www.democraticunderground.com/100255042

I definitely have a problem with it being a legal option for jurors, but making it illegal to tell them it's an option.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
28. There have always been crackpots, kooks and paranoids out there.
Tue May 29, 2012, 10:39 AM
May 2012

Now they are firmly in control of one of the major political parties. This kind of crap would be amusing if they weren't deadly serious about it.

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
29. Man, that's a lot of crazy for one document!
Tue May 29, 2012, 10:44 AM
May 2012

When you get all the conservative ideas down on one paper, you can see this party isn't fit to rule. I get the feeling that the John Birchers of the 1960s would think this platform is paranoid.
 

Zalatix

(8,994 posts)
30. Jury nullification can also be used to save pesky brown people from courtroom lynchings.
Tue May 29, 2012, 10:47 AM
May 2012

Just a FYI.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
32. How much of this is really new?
Tue May 29, 2012, 10:58 AM
May 2012

For example, I believe getting rid of the minimum wage has been on their platform since I lived there before 2001. I think I mentioned that in an LTTE. Getting rid of the income tax has been a bill in the House with 60 something Republican co-sponsors for at least four years, probably longer. (All I can find now is HR 25 (the UnFairTax Act creating a national sales tax of 23% to replace income and FICA taxes with 67 co-sponsors in the House)

But also, I do not consider "jury nullification" to be a "highly controversial notion".

cyberswede

(26,117 posts)
35. I bet the Republican Platform looks similar in lots of states.
Tue May 29, 2012, 12:31 PM
May 2012

In fact, the National Republican Platform is equally disturbing.

http://www.gop.com/2008Platform/

GoCubsGo

(32,086 posts)
36. You know it.
Tue May 29, 2012, 12:50 PM
May 2012

The SCGOP platform is at least as nutty and disturbing. About the only difference is that they have an extra plank in it that insists that the US Dept. of Energy dispose of all nuclear waste produced here on the Savannah River Site in somebody else's backyard. In other words, South Carolinians get to benefit from all the prosperity from all the billions in government money, but somebody else has to pay for the resulting garbage. Typical.

mercuryblues

(14,532 posts)
37. • Build a fence along the entire U.S. border with Mexico.
Tue May 29, 2012, 02:07 PM
May 2012

Since when does Iowa border Mexico? They wouldn't be trying to tell other states how to spend their own money, would they?

Sirveri

(4,517 posts)
41. Jury nullification is NOT a radical right wing notion, nor should it be.
Wed May 30, 2012, 06:28 AM
May 2012

Also it always pisses me off when they say that repealing the 16th would somehow make income taxes illegal. The SCOTUS ruled that income taxes were legal(since congress has the power to tax), and that the only thing that the 16th did was eliminate the need to spend the money evenly among the states.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A letter to the good peop...