General Discussion

brooklynite

(94,575 posts) Fri Dec 4, 2015, 08:49 PM Dec 2015

Is there any logical reason to allow Bush, Christie and Fiorina in the next debate?

Trump: 36

Cruz: 16
Carson: 14
Rubio: 12

Christie: 4
Bush: 3
Florina: 3

I think they're being included solely for entertainment value.

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is there any logical reason to allow Bush, Christie and Fiorina in the next debate? (Original Post) brooklynite Dec 2015 OP

Is there any logical reason why they're not in prison now for how they've harmed Americans? nt valerief Dec 2015 #1

for the comedy value, certainly. Otherwise, they are no more or less guillaumeb Dec 2015 #2

'Logical' reason? elleng Dec 2015 #3

NO. Fiorina is already responsible indirectly for the deaths of the people PatrickforO Dec 2015 #4

I don't think Republican debates run on logic. Agnosticsherbet Dec 2015 #5

Is there any logical reason for any of them to be even considered doc03 Dec 2015 #6

TPTB Repuke establishment expected Jeb to be the nominee and LibDemAlways Dec 2015 #7

This is a testament to how delusional they are. smirkymonkey Dec 2015 #8

...the off chance that Christie will forget lunch and end up eating Rand Paul on stage? Warren DeMontague Dec 2015 #9

Jeb would be better... Kalidurga Dec 2015 #10

valerief

(53,235 posts)

1. Is there any logical reason why they're not in prison now for how they've harmed Americans? nt

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 08:52 PM

Dec 2015

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)

2. for the comedy value, certainly. Otherwise, they are no more or less

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 08:52 PM

Dec 2015

foolish than the top 4

elleng

(130,914 posts)

3. 'Logical' reason?

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 08:53 PM

Dec 2015

They're running for President!

PatrickforO

(14,574 posts)

4. NO. Fiorina is already responsible indirectly for the deaths of the people

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 08:54 PM

Dec 2015

in that PP clinic in Colorado Springs.

Given that, I'd suggest a different venue for her than the GOP debate stage...how about a nice trial docket?

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)

5. I don't think Republican debates run on logic.

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 08:54 PM

Dec 2015

doc03

(35,338 posts)

6. Is there any logical reason for any of them to be even considered

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 08:55 PM

Dec 2015

to be president?

LibDemAlways

(15,139 posts)

7. TPTB Repuke establishment expected Jeb to be the nominee and

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 08:57 PM

Dec 2015

are probably still angling for some sort of pathway to the nomination. They didn't realize that the base despises Jeb, and they are no doubt still in denial that he has no shot. Once the wingnuts show up to vote for Trump or Cruz in the primaries, they will have no choice but to face reality.

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)

8. This is a testament to how delusional they are.

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 09:20 PM

Dec 2015

None of them has a snowball's chance in hell, yet they persist. They can't get it through their fat skulls that they have already lost. FFS, the egos of these insane republican sociopaths never cease to amaze me.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)

9. ...the off chance that Christie will forget lunch and end up eating Rand Paul on stage?

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 09:22 PM

Dec 2015

I don't know, I would watch that.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)

10. Jeb would be better...

Reply to Warren DeMontague (Reply #9)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 09:34 PM

Dec 2015

I hear the Bush's taste like chicken-hawk.

Reply to this discussion