Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 09:28 PM Dec 2015

Protests in the Ivies: Whatever Happened to Irreverence and Thick Skins?

Protests in the Ivies: Whatever Happened to Irreverence and Thick Skins?

Andrew Levine
Friday, 04 December 2015 10:18

By Andrew Levine. This article was first published on Counterpunch.



If I recall correctly, there was an Emily Post parody – the subject was etiquette for leftists — that appeared in The National Lampoon early in the 1970s. The National Lampoon was one of several American equivalents, more or less, of France’s Le Canard Enchaîné, the ancestor of the recently famous (in America) Charlie Hebdo.

Memories fade but I do remember that readers were advised that it was proper and even commendable to fart in public, though not in the presence of Black Panthers.

That little gem captured the attitude of leftwing students at the time; and indeed of many leftists from time immemorial.

There have always been dour, later-day “friends of the people” for whom “political correctness” avant la lettre came naturally. This was, in part, a class phenomenon; puritanical self-righteousness is an affliction of the petite bourgeoisie. Truly downtrodden people are seldom thin skinned enough to care.

Proletarians seldom speak decorously to one another, except, of course, in the presence of persons owed special respect. Seemingly offensive speech – what high- minded academics call “words that hurt” – delivered in a comradely manner to persons in similar situations more often foster feelings of solidarity than difference.

This is one reason why African Americans sometimes use the word that no one else dares utter, the dreaded “n-word,” among themselves.

Left-leaning students in the United States in the late sixties and early seventies were an irreverent lot, regardless of their class position. Sardonic humor was in; conventional manners were out — except, of course, in the presence of Black Panthers and similarly iconic heroes. Students were no more proletarian then than they are today, but proletarian-like attitudes were the order of the day.

Hence the advice on farting.

Women and homosexuals were disparaged too, as per the spirit of the times. But that was a different, less innocent, phenomenon.

First and second wave feminism arose out of the Left; the gay liberation movement did too. There was surely more support for sexual equality, and more tolerance of homosexuality, on the left than in the general population. But the fact remains that the patriarchal and homophobic attitudes of the larger society were pervasive across the entire political and class spectrum.

No good came of it. In ways both overt and subtle, offensive forms of expression, directed at women and gays, helped buttress patriarchal and homophobic attitudes and institutions.

The remedy, though, was not censorship or self-censorship; it was consciousness raising – for perpetrators and victims alike. Because consciousness was raised, leading women and gays to fight back, the situation now is much improved, though there is still a long way to go.

The spirit behind these developments spilled over into wider social and political circles, breathing new life into political movements organized around notions of ascribed or chosen identities. The decline of the historical Left facilitated this phenomenon. Something had to fill the void.

Identity politics partly accounts for the triumph of the dour in contemporary leftwing culture. This is one reason why the Emily Post ethos is back; why the dominant view now is that everybody, regardless of race, religion, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation and so on, must be shown respect in the way that The National Lampoon reserved for Black Panthers.

It has been this way for a long time. There are still irreverent spirits around; but, to survive, even they have had to tread lightly.

For the most part, the irreverent still situate themselves to the left of the dead center; this is their natural home. But, in the broader left, such as it is, irreverence is no longer esteemed. The virtues liberals prize, decorum and civility, have taken its place.

Resurgent religiosity is culpable too. For the readers and writers of the old National Lampoon, God was dead. It turned out, though, that reports of His (or was it Her?) demise were exaggerated. Now God is back with a vengeance, and it can be dangerous to satirize what the godly revere.

It is different in a few parts of Africa and elsewhere, but, in North America, Christian terrorists threaten only abortion providers and other defenders of women’s autonomy and reproductive rights. They are a murderous lot, but they have not made the general public feel unsafe.

There are occasional flare-ups of terrorist violence carried out by skinheads, survivalists, white supremacists, gun fanatics and the like. The perpetrators sometimes identify as Christians; however, their motivations are seldom religious in the conventional sense.

Jewish terrorists focus on the ethnic cleansing of Palestine to the exclusion of everything else; all they do outside the Promised Land is raise money. Therefore the only fear they instill half a world away is the fear of being called an anti-Semite or a self-hating Jew.

These taunts are losing their sting – as the fatuity of the thinking behind them becomes apparent to more and more people, and as news of what Israel does, and has done, to Palestinians has become more widely known.

Islamist terrorists are another matter. Reasonably or not, everybody now is a little afraid on their account. For the existence of Islamist terrorism, we have mainly the United States and other Western powers to thank. America’s – and France’s and Britain’s — wars on the historically Muslim world set the plague in motion, and keep it alive; as do their alliances with the principal backers of Islamist terrorism, Saudi Arabia and the other, petroleum rich Salafist monarchies of the Gulf region.

All this has made for a chilling effect that afflicts even the most irreverent, free spirited souls among us. It has also done a number on the broader, formerly irreverent, Left. The watchword in leftish precincts now is: niceness for all.

Students, especially at elite colleges and universities, are the worst offenders. Blame the rise of identity politics for the fact that the young have become so prissy – perhaps not in general, but in politics and in cultural matters that bear on politics. There have been signs, recently, that the pendulum is swinging back, but it still has a long way to go.

For years now, people have understood this, adjusting their actions and expectations accordingly.

More, Continued at:

http://therealnews.com/t2/component/content/article/379-andrew-levine/2578-protests-in-the-ivies-whatever-happened-to-irreverence-and-thick-skins

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Protests in the Ivies: Whatever Happened to Irreverence and Thick Skins? (Original Post) KoKo Dec 2015 OP
I've lost count of the number of times I've been told not to be offended at the phrase: sibelian Dec 2015 #1
I've Been Told There's A New Liberation Movement... The Liberation Of The Jackass... WillyT Dec 2015 #2
i remember that. Vividly. hifiguy Dec 2015 #4
FWIW, I run a Youtube channel AnnetteJacobs Dec 2015 #3

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
1. I've lost count of the number of times I've been told not to be offended at the phrase:
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 09:43 PM
Dec 2015

..."That's so gay"

"They don't really mean gay, you know..."

"I didn't mean you when I said faggot. I mean... you know... faggots. Faggoty people."

Well, fine.

Actually, sometimes it's been quite fun in Youtube comments.

Weird guy: "You're gay."

Me: "Why yes, yes I am."

Weird guy: ....confused silence....

The thing that annoys me is this - it makes me think "Why ME? How come b***h, w***e, n****r, etc are all so terribly oppressive and not 'GAY'? Oh yeah. It's actually just the same word I use to describe myself anyway. Hm. That's a bit confusing."

It's a bit like folk looking at shitty things and saying: "that's so BLACK." "that's so FEMALE." "Oh! I didn't mean BLACK black. I didn't mean FEMALE female. I just meant,... you know... black. As in shitty. Female. As in kinda crap. Ya know? Thin skin, bro."

Not even n****r or b***h. GAY. The ACTUAL descriptor, not the "demeaning" one, faggot. It ALREADY means "shitty".

People don't seem to get this.

But, there we go.

I've given up telling people to stop it. They're just not going to. And I have actually stopped being offended. I don't really care, now.
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
2. I've Been Told There's A New Liberation Movement... The Liberation Of The Jackass...
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 10:20 PM
Dec 2015

Are you old to remember this ???



It's been re-done... and I intend it in humor only.




 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
4. i remember that. Vividly.
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:25 PM
Dec 2015

The NatLamp (and Mad Magazine) were profound influences on my sense of humor.

"Be thankful that your dog is finally getting enough cheese..." (I flashed on that without watching it!)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Protests in the Ivies: Wh...