Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LuckyTheDog

(6,837 posts)
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 03:30 PM Dec 2015

Counting mass shootings a bad way to understand gun violence in America

According to articles this week across the Internet, there has been an average of one mass shooting every day in the United States: 355 so far this year. It’s a jarring statistic, and one that has gone viral in the wake of this week’s massacre in San Bernardino, California.

But there are two problems with the number: It doesn’t actually provide a clear estimate of how often the country has seen shooting rampages like the one in San Bernardino. And it obscures the broader reality of gun violence in America.

Counting “mass shootings” is notoriously complicated and contested, since there is no standard definition of what they are. Is it best to count shootings that injure or kill a certain number of people? Or should the definition focus more narrowly on attacks in which the motivation of the shooter “ appears to be indiscriminate killing”?

Mother Jones, which has been tracking mass shootings since 2012, has counted just four mass shootings this year, and a total of 73 since 1982, as Mother Jones editor Mark Follman has noted in The New York Times.

MORE HERE: http://yonside.com/counting-mass-shootings-a-bad-way-to-understand-gun-violence-in-america/


1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Counting mass shootings a bad way to understand gun violence in America (Original Post) LuckyTheDog Dec 2015 OP
Precisely: the more open way of counting lumps together enormously different types of crime. Lizzie Poppet Dec 2015 #1
 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
1. Precisely: the more open way of counting lumps together enormously different types of crime.
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 04:28 PM
Dec 2015

In terms of understanding the incident as completely as possible (in order to determine motivations and a zillion other aspects of what led to the incident), it's confounding when a genuine "random spree killer's" crime is lumped in with a gang shootout or a domestic murder/suicide.

Mother Jones' way of counting is much more accurate and useful...but doesn't lend itself to hyperbolic headlines and hand-wringing. It doesn't add to the endless refrain of "fear, fear, FEAR!"

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Counting mass shootings a...