General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAs a combat veteran, let me urge you: eliminate the draft as a concept
I do understand the movement in the past few days to include women in the Selective Service Act of 1940.
The idea is based on the fact that combat-designated military operational specialties are now (finally!) no longer limited to males.
Damn straight. That's exactly how it should be.
Now, here comes the question: why aren't women eligible for the draft?
Fair enough.
Let me post the riposte: why are men?
In 7 years in the Marine Corps, including two Iraq tours, nobody was ever comfortable with the idea of a draft. It may sound awesome when you're making a point, but to ask a grenadier to grant that implicit trust to someone who is there by legal compulsion is another thing.
My experience of the serving military is that not a damn one of us want the draft. I absolutely would not trust someone who did not volunteer. YMMV.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)My husband is a Vietnam Veteran and he says that "if" there is to be a draft, it has to be fair. No deferments of any kind save for medical and everybody registers including women. No rich kids playing frat house keg party while the poor kids have to go fight. He would agree with you about not trusting anyone who didn't volunteer.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Even under your husband's scenario, the rich will pull strings to get their kids stationed somewhere away from the warzone.
47of74
(18,470 posts)....keeping beer taps safe from the unwashed masses. When he bothered to show up, that is.
Vinca
(50,318 posts)But is there a way to get the warmongers' kids into the game? We've seen this movie before. Republicans beat their chests, show their balls and send the children of other people off to die in their folly.
Elmergantry
(884 posts)conservative, if you hadn't noticed.
Anyway, I am against the draft as well. But as long as we have SS, women should sign up too.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Even if you make deferments impossible, the "warmongers" will still be able to pull strings and get their children assigned away from the warzone. So the poor kids go to the meatgrinder, the rich kids spend a couple years in Hawaii, mostly goofing off.
madokie
(51,076 posts)were draftees.
Glorfindel
(9,739 posts)and just a wee bit offended that a "grenadier" wouldn't trust me for that reason. I went where I was sent and did what I was told, just as the mercenaries ("volunteers" did.
H2O Man
(73,637 posts)Thank you for this.
TM99
(8,352 posts)exists and forces young men of combat age to sign up in order to get federal loans and federal jobs then yes, now that women can serve in combat, they should also be required.
I don't want to see a draft. I want SS done away with. But for now, it is still there.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Millions?
Moreover, your idea of "volunteering" is itself weak and romanticized. For many, joining the military even as a "volunteer" is hardly a matter of Cartesian agency.
Your point relies on a kind of unanswerable authority ("I am a combat veteran, and we say..." , but it's pretty piss poor once you scratch the surface. hell, it's even profoundly insulting to probably many members of this board who were called to service in Vietnam (or Korea, or WWII) and answered that call with courage and honor.
Not your best attempt.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I want every Marine to my right and to my left to be there voluntarily.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)I really don't care that you have a dumb argument and refuse to deal with that, either. Have a good day puffing out your chest.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,390 posts)Because it concentrates both on freedom of choice, and on the effectiveness on a drafted military. People who are there against their will may be unreliable as comrades. You don't know, and not knowing is itself a problem. As the OP said, you need 'implicit trust'.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Here is a capybara being groomed by monkeys:
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Why is that what you focused on?
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)... then the rules change. For the better.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)You knew in the Airborne that the guy next to you would not be a draftee.
gladium et scutum
(808 posts)the extra $25.00 a month paid for serving in airborne. I have known several paratroops from WWII. they said the extra $25. was what drew them to that service.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)You could not be in the Airborne if drafted.
Same applied to the Rangers.
gladium et scutum
(808 posts)a pfc in 1941 was paid $40.00 a month. Jump pay was an additional $25.00. Volunteers were no problem.
panader0
(25,816 posts)Many of those who volunteer do so because they have no other options.
In that sense they are compelled, even if not legally so.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)The lowest two quintiles by income are also the lowest two quintiles by enlistment.
tkmorris
(11,138 posts)I'd like to see it.
2012lurker
(4 posts)struggle4progress
(118,379 posts)w0nderer
(1,937 posts)i was in a country where we had 'mandatory' military service
1-2.5 years depending on 'track'
mine was 2.5 + 5 year contract + 2.5 contract (i reupped)
i don't like 'draftees' << -- how are they trained?, how are they treated?
we didn't mind them
the advantage to draftees (and notice i was both a draftee and a pro for a double up contract)
.....you get to use them next year..ie..you have semi trained soldiers for next session and the one after and the one after
uppityperson
(115,681 posts)pnwmom
(109,009 posts)And failed, in large part because the opponents said it would subject women to the draft.
So no draft for women. Not till the ERA is passed.
grntuscarora
(1,249 posts)Only when ALL families have a stake will people get off their asses and tell the ptb in no uncertain terms when they're screwing up.
i'm 60 years old, and I remember.
I understand your point of view, but I don't agree that no draft is best.