Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 08:34 AM Dec 2015

As a combat veteran, let me urge you: eliminate the draft as a concept

I do understand the movement in the past few days to include women in the Selective Service Act of 1940.

The idea is based on the fact that combat-designated military operational specialties are now (finally!) no longer limited to males.

Damn straight. That's exactly how it should be.

Now, here comes the question: why aren't women eligible for the draft?

Fair enough.

Let me post the riposte: why are men?

In 7 years in the Marine Corps, including two Iraq tours, nobody was ever comfortable with the idea of a draft. It may sound awesome when you're making a point, but to ask a grenadier to grant that implicit trust to someone who is there by legal compulsion is another thing.

My experience of the serving military is that not a damn one of us want the draft. I absolutely would not trust someone who did not volunteer. YMMV.

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
As a combat veteran, let me urge you: eliminate the draft as a concept (Original Post) Recursion Dec 2015 OP
Good point leftofcool Dec 2015 #1
The rich kids will still get their keg party. jeff47 Dec 2015 #16
Yeah, Shrub spent the better part of his TX ANG commitment... 47of74 Dec 2015 #30
Good points. Vinca Dec 2015 #2
The majority of the military are Elmergantry Dec 2015 #7
No, there is no way. jeff47 Dec 2015 #15
Hell most of the guys and gals I served with madokie Dec 2015 #3
Me, too... I was a draftee myself Glorfindel Dec 2015 #6
Recommended. H2O Man Dec 2015 #4
As long as the Selective Service Act TM99 Dec 2015 #5
How many draftees have served honorably and with distinction? alcibiades_mystery Dec 2015 #8
I don't care? Recursion Dec 2015 #9
Uh huh alcibiades_mystery Dec 2015 #10
It's a very good argument, actually muriel_volestrangler Dec 2015 #13
Umm. OK Recursion Dec 2015 #20
Interesting Recursion Dec 2015 #12
I think the draft is outdated for small wars, but it may be required in a very large scale war. MillennialDem Dec 2015 #11
When EVERYONE has skin in the game... 99Forever Dec 2015 #14
That's why so many volunteers in World War II chose elite operations like Airborne. MohRokTah Dec 2015 #17
Could it have been gladium et scutum Dec 2015 #22
It was also all volunteer. MohRokTah Dec 2015 #23
Again, gladium et scutum Dec 2015 #33
I understand your point Recursion but-- panader0 Dec 2015 #18
How so? It's almost impossible for poor people to enlist Recursion Dec 2015 #19
You happen to have a link for that data? tkmorris Dec 2015 #24
Here you go 2012lurker Dec 2015 #25
All kinds of unfit people may volunteer for the wrong reasons struggle4progress Dec 2015 #21
Guess that depends on how it's applied w0nderer Dec 2015 #26
tEXACLTY! Thank you. uppityperson Dec 2015 #27
I'm still waiting for the Equal Rights Amendment that we tried to pass decades ago. pnwmom Dec 2015 #28
No. grntuscarora Dec 2015 #29
And make goddamn sure the rich and well connected cannot get their kids assigned to champagne units. 47of74 Dec 2015 #31
+1 grntuscarora Dec 2015 #32

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
1. Good point
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 08:48 AM
Dec 2015

My husband is a Vietnam Veteran and he says that "if" there is to be a draft, it has to be fair. No deferments of any kind save for medical and everybody registers including women. No rich kids playing frat house keg party while the poor kids have to go fight. He would agree with you about not trusting anyone who didn't volunteer.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
16. The rich kids will still get their keg party.
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 11:00 AM
Dec 2015

Even under your husband's scenario, the rich will pull strings to get their kids stationed somewhere away from the warzone.

 

47of74

(18,470 posts)
30. Yeah, Shrub spent the better part of his TX ANG commitment...
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 11:39 PM
Dec 2015

....keeping beer taps safe from the unwashed masses. When he bothered to show up, that is.

Vinca

(50,318 posts)
2. Good points.
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 08:51 AM
Dec 2015

But is there a way to get the warmongers' kids into the game? We've seen this movie before. Republicans beat their chests, show their balls and send the children of other people off to die in their folly.

 

Elmergantry

(884 posts)
7. The majority of the military are
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 09:14 AM
Dec 2015

conservative, if you hadn't noticed.

Anyway, I am against the draft as well. But as long as we have SS, women should sign up too.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
15. No, there is no way.
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 10:59 AM
Dec 2015

Even if you make deferments impossible, the "warmongers" will still be able to pull strings and get their children assigned away from the warzone. So the poor kids go to the meatgrinder, the rich kids spend a couple years in Hawaii, mostly goofing off.

Glorfindel

(9,739 posts)
6. Me, too... I was a draftee myself
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 09:12 AM
Dec 2015

and just a wee bit offended that a "grenadier" wouldn't trust me for that reason. I went where I was sent and did what I was told, just as the mercenaries ("volunteers&quot did.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
5. As long as the Selective Service Act
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 09:11 AM
Dec 2015

exists and forces young men of combat age to sign up in order to get federal loans and federal jobs then yes, now that women can serve in combat, they should also be required.

I don't want to see a draft. I want SS done away with. But for now, it is still there.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
8. How many draftees have served honorably and with distinction?
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 09:15 AM
Dec 2015

Millions?

Moreover, your idea of "volunteering" is itself weak and romanticized. For many, joining the military even as a "volunteer" is hardly a matter of Cartesian agency.

Your point relies on a kind of unanswerable authority ("I am a combat veteran, and we say...&quot , but it's pretty piss poor once you scratch the surface. hell, it's even profoundly insulting to probably many members of this board who were called to service in Vietnam (or Korea, or WWII) and answered that call with courage and honor.

Not your best attempt.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
10. Uh huh
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 09:38 AM
Dec 2015

I really don't care that you have a dumb argument and refuse to deal with that, either. Have a good day puffing out your chest.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,390 posts)
13. It's a very good argument, actually
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 10:02 AM
Dec 2015

Because it concentrates both on freedom of choice, and on the effectiveness on a drafted military. People who are there against their will may be unreliable as comrades. You don't know, and not knowing is itself a problem. As the OP said, you need 'implicit trust'.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
12. Interesting
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 09:49 AM
Dec 2015
Your point relies on a kind of unanswerable authority ("I am a combat veteran, and we say...&quot

Why is that what you focused on?
 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
17. That's why so many volunteers in World War II chose elite operations like Airborne.
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 11:03 AM
Dec 2015

You knew in the Airborne that the guy next to you would not be a draftee.

gladium et scutum

(808 posts)
22. Could it have been
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 10:34 PM
Dec 2015

the extra $25.00 a month paid for serving in airborne. I have known several paratroops from WWII. they said the extra $25. was what drew them to that service.

gladium et scutum

(808 posts)
33. Again,
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 12:49 AM
Dec 2015

a pfc in 1941 was paid $40.00 a month. Jump pay was an additional $25.00. Volunteers were no problem.

panader0

(25,816 posts)
18. I understand your point Recursion but--
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 11:06 AM
Dec 2015

Many of those who volunteer do so because they have no other options.
In that sense they are compelled, even if not legally so.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
19. How so? It's almost impossible for poor people to enlist
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 11:38 AM
Dec 2015

The lowest two quintiles by income are also the lowest two quintiles by enlistment.

w0nderer

(1,937 posts)
26. Guess that depends on how it's applied
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 11:05 PM
Dec 2015

i was in a country where we had 'mandatory' military service

1-2.5 years depending on 'track'

mine was 2.5 + 5 year contract + 2.5 contract (i reupped)

i don't like 'draftees' << -- how are they trained?, how are they treated?


we didn't mind them



the advantage to draftees (and notice i was both a draftee and a pro for a double up contract)
.....you get to use them next year..ie..you have semi trained soldiers for next session and the one after and the one after

pnwmom

(109,009 posts)
28. I'm still waiting for the Equal Rights Amendment that we tried to pass decades ago.
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 11:17 PM
Dec 2015

And failed, in large part because the opponents said it would subject women to the draft.

So no draft for women. Not till the ERA is passed.

grntuscarora

(1,249 posts)
29. No.
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 11:37 PM
Dec 2015

Only when ALL families have a stake will people get off their asses and tell the ptb in no uncertain terms when they're screwing up.
i'm 60 years old, and I remember.

I understand your point of view, but I don't agree that no draft is best.

 

47of74

(18,470 posts)
31. And make goddamn sure the rich and well connected cannot get their kids assigned to champagne units.
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 11:41 PM
Dec 2015
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»As a combat veteran, let ...