General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRomney campaign quietly scrubs all mentions of anti-labor adviser Peter Schaumber
Specifically, the Romney campaign appears to have spirited away a column published last Sept. by Schaumber that blames working people for Americas sagging economy and suggests that labor unions may no longer even be necessary. Schaumber was named Romneys top labor policy adviser less than a week after writing that column, but he resigned in April following allegations involving improper leaks from Flynn.
...
On Sept. 6, 2011, less than a week after he published an editorial in The National Review that quoted an NLRB board members dissenting opinion contained in privileged documents leaked by Flynn, Schaumber published a column on MittRomney.com that placed blame for Americas economic malaise squarely upon organized labor. Romney announced just six days later that hed picked Schaumber to co-chair his labor policy advisory group.
That Sept. 6 column, along with every other mention of Schaumber, has since been scrubbed from Romneys website. Despite the campaigns attempt to send its former adviser down the memory hole, Schaumbers anti-labor essay was preserved on Google Cache and archived by Raw Story.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/05/29/romney-campaign-quietly-scrubs-all-mentions-of-anti-labor-adviser-peter-schaumber/
I guess he and his campaign think that if they scrub it, the issue will just go away. Let's make sure that it doesn't.
Response to SunsetDreams (Original post)
Post removed
SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)I've heard a lot of stories over the years from people who claim to be anti-union. I've heard very little that isn't anecdotal accounts of how they got "screwed" by the union or other anecdotal accounts of how union officials are "corrupt". Almost always there's healthy doses of hyperbole thrown in and I've yet to hear one testimonial that could pass a basic bullshit test.
Saying you are anti-union because of these reasons is kinda like saying you are anti-Democracy because some politicians are corrupt. The system may not be perfect, but it's a helluva lot better than the alternative. In this case, the alternative is being placed at the mercy of your employer and laissez-faire capitalism that inevitably screw workers for the sake of the .01%.
Skittles
(153,164 posts)and no, I don't care for you to list your PERSONAL GRIEVANCES
Suji to Seoul
(2,035 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)Sadie5
(1,933 posts)that Mitty was anti union and anti anything that might help the middle class and poor. This article simply gives us more proof to chew on.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)That's not how the internet works. Strange though; for all the popularity you'd assume an anti-union and anti-working people stance would have (even right here on DU with some folks who should know better), why Mitt's so assiduously scrubbing, scrubbing, scrubbing to get that damn spot out.