Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,066 posts)
Wed May 30, 2012, 08:10 AM May 2012

House to vote on bill banning abortions based on sex of child

When did THIS become an issue in the US? They sure find novel ways to waste time worrying about the wrong things...

Posted at 06:00 AM ET, 05/30/2012
House to vote on bill banning abortions based on sex of child
By Ed O'Keefe

snip//

The National Right to Life Committee, a staunch abortion opponent, said the bill is necessary to combat the growing trend of “sex selection abortions” in Asian countries, where parents prefer to give birth to boys. The trend is also growing in popularity in the United States, especially in Asian communities, the group said.

The NRLC charged in a statement Tuesday that Democratic lawmakers who accuse Republicans of waging a “war on women” should consider “whether they wish to be recorded as being defenders of the escalating war on baby girls.”

But Democrats say the bill could unfairly target minority women seeking abortions, because doctors may suspect they are trying to abort a fetus because of its sex.

“The bill would require doctors to police their patients, undermining patient-doctor privilege,” Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) said in a statement. “It limits a woman’s right to choose and jeopardizes her access to safe, legal medical care.”


Conyers, ranking member on the House Judiciary Committee, fought GOP attempts to name the bill after Susan B. Anthony and Frederick Douglass, arguing that doing so disrespected their legacies. Republicans said that the civil rights leaders would have backed the bill, but later relented and agreed to change its name.

more...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/2chambers/post/house-to-vote-on-bill-banning-abortions-based-on-sex-of-child/2012/05/29/gJQAFVgB0U_blog.html

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House to vote on bill banning abortions based on sex of child (Original Post) babylonsister May 2012 OP
What about sex linked genetic defects? Ugh. What about choice, period? Butterbean May 2012 #1
I'm going to demand legislation banning sales of unicorn horns ... zbdent May 2012 #2
what part of PRIVACY do these idiots not understand CBGLuthier May 2012 #3
so congress is now legislating for asian countries?????? spanone May 2012 #4
Who is going to "police" this? HockeyMom May 2012 #5
Another camel's nose. My favorite part: Egalitarian Thug May 2012 #6
I, too, thought of the camel's nose when I saw that... HereSince1628 May 2012 #9
Obviously, great minds do move alike! Egalitarian Thug May 2012 #11
Where are the figures on this "growing trend"? As usual, they throw these accusations out Arkansas Granny May 2012 #7
Exactly what I wondered, too. nt babylonsister May 2012 #13
I thought for a second it was China liberal N proud May 2012 #8
Foot in the door get the red out May 2012 #10
Democrats want to kill females joeglow3 May 2012 #12
The RW loons already say that all the time. Mariana May 2012 #14

Butterbean

(1,014 posts)
1. What about sex linked genetic defects? Ugh. What about choice, period?
Wed May 30, 2012, 08:16 AM
May 2012

What business is it of theirs why she chooses to do it?

CBGLuthier

(12,723 posts)
3. what part of PRIVACY do these idiots not understand
Wed May 30, 2012, 08:24 AM
May 2012

PRIVACY as in none of your fucking business, DOC is the only answer any woman should ever give.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
5. Who is going to "police" this?
Wed May 30, 2012, 08:30 AM
May 2012

How many kids do you have? What are their genders? How are they going to know? Impossible for them to do this.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
6. Another camel's nose. My favorite part:
Wed May 30, 2012, 08:30 AM
May 2012

The National Right to Life Committee, a staunch abortion opponent, said the (U.S.) bill is necessary to combat the growing trend of “sex selection abortions” in Asian countries, where parents prefer to give birth to boys.

Worse, how many morons will take up the cry "to protect the little Asian babies"?

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
9. I, too, thought of the camel's nose when I saw that...
Wed May 30, 2012, 08:47 AM
May 2012

Last edited Wed May 30, 2012, 11:27 AM - Edit history (1)

My thought was this is a first step in a multi-step process that attempts to get at something entirely different than gender selection in abortion.









Arkansas Granny

(31,517 posts)
7. Where are the figures on this "growing trend"? As usual, they throw these accusations out
Wed May 30, 2012, 08:35 AM
May 2012

there with so data to back them up. It's just one more step to make a legal medical procedure harder and harder to obtain.

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
12. Democrats want to kill females
Wed May 30, 2012, 09:32 AM
May 2012

Mark my words: some tool will twist this into proof that Democrats are the party that REALLY hates females and want to wipe them out.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»House to vote on bill ban...