Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 08:30 PM Dec 2015

Would you support not giving visas to people who post anti-American views on social media?

Imagine if Noam Chomsky was an Irish national. Would his condemnation of American empire building keep him out of the country? Or if another Irishman pledged his support of ISIS?

Do we keep people out because of their viewpoint?

59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Would you support not giving visas to people who post anti-American views on social media? (Original Post) AngryAmish Dec 2015 OP
Yep. First Amendment does not apply to prospective immigrants. Nye Bevan Dec 2015 #1
Visa's are not only for immigration. newthinking Dec 2015 #25
The most dangerous people in America were born here. leveymg Dec 2015 #40
I post views that would be seen as anti-american all the time. Anti-imperialism has become Ed Suspicious Dec 2015 #2
Your not requesting a VISA yeoman6987 Dec 2015 #5
But not so other people? daleanime Dec 2015 #26
Were talking about non American citizens who are trying to come to OUR country yeoman6987 Dec 2015 #48
So do you want to take a shoot at describing these "anti-american".... daleanime Dec 2015 #50
Yep. No dangerous people born here. kcr Dec 2015 #44
You do realize that includes a lot of us? jwirr Dec 2015 #3
Probably, but context is key. Jester Messiah Dec 2015 #4
Irish Chomsky fine, anti-empire building is cool. Irishman or Chomsky ISSI supporter, is not fine. winstars Dec 2015 #6
Irish Chomsky would be a great username. AngryAmish Dec 2015 #7
or a band!!! winstars Dec 2015 #8
You mean like Farley Mowat? uppityperson Dec 2015 #9
Why should we give visas TeddyR Dec 2015 #10
This moves into regulating movement by thought does it not? newthinking Dec 2015 #22
Why the deliberate misinformation in the thread title? climber3986 Dec 2015 #11
Threatening remarks, yes. kcr Dec 2015 #45
Should be handled on a case by case basis. Agnosticsherbet Dec 2015 #12
No TeddyR Dec 2015 #14
Because they will come here, stay for a short time, get to know Americans, spend money. Agnosticsherbet Dec 2015 #17
There's a big difference between visitor Boudica the Lyoness Dec 2015 #42
The question was about posting anti-American views on social media and Visas. Agnosticsherbet Dec 2015 #43
Nah. Free speech is what the United States is ABOUT.[n/t] Maedhros Dec 2015 #13
Free speech for those subject TeddyR Dec 2015 #15
The Constitution's protections apply to everyone who is in the country, Art_from_Ark Dec 2015 #20
If they are requesting a VISA madville Dec 2015 #29
The Constitution does not grant rights to persons, Maedhros Dec 2015 #37
So if some fundamentalist Christian wacko from Europe, Nye Bevan Dec 2015 #16
you mean our forefathers? foo_bar Dec 2015 #36
Nope. Differences of opinon are needed in a democracy. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2015 #18
Then do we keep out the woman who did the San Bernardino incident? AngryAmish Dec 2015 #19
All corpses should be banned. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2015 #23
https://www.google.com/search?q=rub+of+the+green&oq=rub+of+the&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l3.5874j0j4&clien AngryAmish Dec 2015 #38
Indeed, how do we keep out the Dylan Roofs? LanternWaste Dec 2015 #58
I don't think so treestar Dec 2015 #21
Define anti-American. Throd Dec 2015 #24
Define "anti-American." MADem Dec 2015 #27
^^^ this right here ^^^ Iggo Dec 2015 #32
Yes, those that hold anti-U.S. views is not Joe Turner Dec 2015 #28
That would really depend on just how extreme they were Downtown Hound Dec 2015 #30
Who gets to define what's anti-American? Iggo Dec 2015 #31
Please define your terms. grntuscarora Dec 2015 #33
sounds like that would apply to trump spanone Dec 2015 #34
He's not asking for a VISA yeoman6987 Dec 2015 #49
Yes. People who don't like our country shouldn't be allowed a green card LittleBlue Dec 2015 #35
Many don't make the distinction you are kcr Dec 2015 #46
Messages that hope for our demise LittleBlue Dec 2015 #47
Many of our own citizens hold those same views kcr Dec 2015 #54
They are entitled to that as citizens LittleBlue Dec 2015 #56
Its a two way street, would you want to be denied entry into countries over your postings on... 951-Riverside Dec 2015 #39
No, that's fascist as hell mwrguy Dec 2015 #41
It depends on the kind of "anti-Americanism" BlueCheese Dec 2015 #51
I'd support no visas for people who post on social media, does that count? =) n/t Shandris Dec 2015 #52
That depends on how you define "anti-American" ibegurpard Dec 2015 #53
I would support not giving visas to people who advocate violence against the US. wickerwoman Dec 2015 #55
If you hate America what is your purpose for being here? ileus Dec 2015 #57
No. This country sucks, the world knows, we are just in denial. alarimer Dec 2015 #59

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
1. Yep. First Amendment does not apply to prospective immigrants.
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 08:32 PM
Dec 2015

If a foreigner who wants to immigrate to the US is posting Death to America and praising Jihad all over Facebook we should keep him or her out.

BTW I would say the same thing about a prospective inmigrant who expresses admiration for Eric Rudolph and states that murdering doctors who perform abortions is a good thing.

newthinking

(3,982 posts)
25. Visa's are not only for immigration.
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 09:53 PM
Dec 2015

I think people need to make the distinction.

Of course immigration visa's should get more scrutiny and they generally do. Certainly those should and do have some measure ofsomeone's intent and general ability to fit in.

Visitor's visas should be handled differently.

I am not sure most people realize how difficult it is to get even a visitor's visa to the US already. Try getting a visa here to attend your sister or brother's wedding when you are young? You have a very good chance of not being able to attend.

That is unless you are coming in for big business.....

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
40. The most dangerous people in America were born here.
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 11:23 PM
Dec 2015

How do you screen and vet them? Hope that makes you feel more secure.

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
2. I post views that would be seen as anti-american all the time. Anti-imperialism has become
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 08:33 PM
Dec 2015

anti-americanism.

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
26. But not so other people?
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 09:58 PM
Dec 2015

Most republicans would have you believe that just being a democrat makes you "anti-american". Now if they're preaching violence, that another thing entirely.

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
50. So do you want to take a shoot at describing these "anti-american"....
Tue Dec 15, 2015, 01:51 AM
Dec 2015

views?

I promise to read them once I stop laughing. Make sure you get a good nights sleep.

 

Jester Messiah

(4,711 posts)
4. Probably, but context is key.
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 08:35 PM
Dec 2015

Are they posting that stuff because not posting it would attract attention they don't want? We need to use our brains instead of employing knee-jerk metrics. It behooves us to take a look at the bigger picture and employ reason.

winstars

(4,220 posts)
6. Irish Chomsky fine, anti-empire building is cool. Irishman or Chomsky ISSI supporter, is not fine.
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 08:38 PM
Dec 2015

No and yes...

newthinking

(3,982 posts)
22. This moves into regulating movement by thought does it not?
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 09:43 PM
Dec 2015

Just because someone may be critical of the country's policies does not mean they are dangerous to us.

I find the idea of starting to limit movement based on whatever belief (that is not dangerous) to be troubling.

Also, Visa's are reciprocally based; so eventually you or I may not be able to travel to Europe or somewhere else we are interested because we post critical of an administration? Or think about how this would effect aid workers, various diplomatic agencies, etc.?

A lot of people travel to places that they are critical of the governments for a lot of reasons, including helping the countries?


climber3986

(107 posts)
11. Why the deliberate misinformation in the thread title?
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 08:47 PM
Dec 2015

No one is worried about people posting 'anti-american' views on social media.

The debate is about what to do with people who pledge support to terrorist groups or threaten to commit violence or promote violence against the United States.

If you pledge support to a terrorist group, talk about killing Americans, or support killing Americans on social media, you should be disqualified from entering the country.

Heck I could technically be posting 'anti-american views' on facebook because I state that climate change is man made

kcr

(15,317 posts)
45. Threatening remarks, yes.
Tue Dec 15, 2015, 12:13 AM
Dec 2015

But even here in this thread there is support for blocking mere "anti-American" statements. I think it's the specific focus on social media that is the cause for concern, and given how many people want to block people just for being anti-American, even here on a supposed progressive message board, I'd say the concern was valid. I would hope that a person would be blocked no matter how they conveyed the threat.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
12. Should be handled on a case by case basis.
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 09:04 PM
Dec 2015

Someone who runs a group that advocates the overthrow of the US Government, No Visa
Someone who doesn't like our foreign policy, give them a Visa.
Most anti-American views should be fine. Some will not be.



Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
17. Because they will come here, stay for a short time, get to know Americans, spend money.
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 09:25 PM
Dec 2015

It is good for Americans to get to know people with different opinions. It is good for them to know the people here as more than US policy.

If they spend money here, it is good for our economy.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
43. The question was about posting anti-American views on social media and Visas.
Tue Dec 15, 2015, 12:05 AM
Dec 2015

Which Visa isn't relevant to that question.

Anti-American views is way to broad. There are countries friendly to the US where a majority hold an anti-American view, whether the have expressed it or not.

It has to be on a case by case basis.

 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
15. Free speech for those subject
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 09:23 PM
Dec 2015

To the Constitution. If you aren't a US citizen then you have no protected rights.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
16. So if some fundamentalist Christian wacko from Europe,
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 09:24 PM
Dec 2015

who praises the murder of doctors who commit abortions, decides he wants to immigrate here so he can start a megachurch for like-minded people, you would be perfectly happy to give him a visa?

foo_bar

(4,193 posts)
36. you mean our forefathers?
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 10:34 PM
Dec 2015

I thought the whole point of America was its nondenominationalism, it's like Australia for religious whackos. But, yeah, advocating murder = bad, seemingly irrational beliefs = all the same to uncle sam, I mean on paper.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
58. Indeed, how do we keep out the Dylan Roofs?
Tue Dec 15, 2015, 09:20 AM
Dec 2015

Indeed, how do we keep out the Dylan Roofs and the Robert Dears?

Or is that too, simply an inconvenient lay of pluralism?

treestar

(82,383 posts)
21. I don't think so
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 09:42 PM
Dec 2015

it would likely have to rise to the level of saying they intended to try to overthrow the government or the like.

During the McCarthy era, advocating communism.

Anybody pledging support of ISIS now is going to be considered a national security risk

Throd

(7,208 posts)
24. Define anti-American.
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 09:53 PM
Dec 2015

I am a proud and loyal American who is often highly critical of this country.

That said, to the jihadi asswipes who have a boner for Daesh, NO VISA FOR YOU!

MADem

(135,425 posts)
27. Define "anti-American."
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 10:01 PM
Dec 2015

"I disagree with the proposal of this person who is a member of (insert political party)?" vs. "I want to go to USA to buy automatic weapons, build bombs, and become the shahid to end all shahids?"

There are a wide range of views in USA. Just because you disagree with ONE American doesn't mean you disagree with ALL Americans.

That said, if someone wants to kill Americans, fuck 'em. They don't deserve a visa, share that name with Interpol.

 

Joe Turner

(930 posts)
28. Yes, those that hold anti-U.S. views is not
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 10:01 PM
Dec 2015

the kind of immigrants that is conductive to a healthy society. Kind of common sense don't you think? If they have intractable problems with this country why would they want to come here any way?

Downtown Hound

(12,618 posts)
30. That would really depend on just how extreme they were
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 10:08 PM
Dec 2015

If it was something like criticism of the U.S. invasion of Iraq or other misguided policies we've indulged in over the years, then I would say most definitely no. As a champion of free speech, we should practice what we preach and not censor the speech of others if they want to come here. If they're posting on ISIS's website and cheering terrorism to the point where it looks like they might be coming here for more than a visit, then I would say yes.

grntuscarora

(1,249 posts)
33. Please define your terms.
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 10:22 PM
Dec 2015

Does "anti-American" mean "critical of"? If it does then, no, I do not support denying visas to people who post anti-American views on social media or anywhere else. If they advocate violence, that's another matter.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
35. Yes. People who don't like our country shouldn't be allowed a green card
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 10:27 PM
Dec 2015

That doesn't mean they can't criticize American policies. But if they have a general hatred of America, they shouldn't be allowed in. I would question why they even want to come if they don't like us.

kcr

(15,317 posts)
46. Many don't make the distinction you are
Tue Dec 15, 2015, 12:16 AM
Dec 2015

between criticizing policy and "not liking the country" BTW, what does not liking the country mean to you?

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
47. Messages that hope for our demise
Tue Dec 15, 2015, 12:40 AM
Dec 2015

Support for our enemies and their ideologies, like Isis. Messages that suggest our legal system should be overturned in favor of religious law. Messages that oppose beliefs that we view as fundamental rights, like free speech, association, religion, etc.



kcr

(15,317 posts)
54. Many of our own citizens hold those same views
Tue Dec 15, 2015, 02:53 AM
Dec 2015

If we truly believe in the ideal of free speech, then we don't ban people from coming here because we don't like their what they say. Threats obviously showing an intent to commit terrorism and other crimes is a different matter.

 

951-Riverside

(7,234 posts)
39. Its a two way street, would you want to be denied entry into countries over your postings on...
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 10:55 PM
Dec 2015

Gay marriage, Israel, Guns, etc, etc?

Also there is no way of verifying that the person who created the account is indeed you, would it be fair to have your vacation or business trip ruined over some idiot who shared the same name as you?

By the way, there are a lot of people named Tashfeen Malik.



http://www.tmz.com/2015/12/04/san-bernardino-shooter-tashfeen-malik-twitter-threat/

BlueCheese

(2,522 posts)
51. It depends on the kind of "anti-Americanism"
Tue Dec 15, 2015, 01:57 AM
Dec 2015

If it's of the "America could be so much better" variety, which I don't really consider anti-Americanism at all, then no, that's not a problem.

If it's of the "America is our enemy and must be destroyed" type, well, then, that's much more serious.

ibegurpard

(16,685 posts)
53. That depends on how you define "anti-American"
Tue Dec 15, 2015, 02:46 AM
Dec 2015

Death to all Americans? Probably not. Someone critical of our government policy? The more the merrier!

wickerwoman

(5,662 posts)
55. I would support not giving visas to people who advocate violence against the US.
Tue Dec 15, 2015, 03:08 AM
Dec 2015

"Anti-American" views, fine. Welcome. Come judge for yourself whether those views and right or wrong. But I don't think a country is under any obligation to admit people who support violent action against it.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
59. No. This country sucks, the world knows, we are just in denial.
Tue Dec 15, 2015, 09:51 AM
Dec 2015

I don't think a person's viewpoint (barring some kinds of extremism) should be enough to deny them a visa. That;s just fascist bullshit.

I hate, hate, hate, the idea of American Exceptionalism. It is a baldfaced lie we tell ourselves to keep running roughshod over the rest of the world.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would you support not giv...