Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 07:22 AM Dec 2015

Panel of federal judges orders free internet radio services to pay higher royalties for streaming

A panel of federal judges ordered free internet radio services like Pandora to raise their royalty rates in a decision set to take effect next year, The New York Times reports. The decision will benefit artists and record labels.

In their decision, the Copyright Royalty Board ruled that webcasters will have to pay record companies 17 cents — up from 14 cents — for every 100 times a song is streamed by listeners who don't pay a subscription fee. Plays by subscribers, however, will now be subject to a rate of 22 cents per 100, down from 25 cents.

The new rates are expected to bring in millions for record companies and artists, though SoundExchange — the non-profit licensing agency representing the labels — had hoped to secure a rate of 25 cents per 100 plays by non-subscribers.

Last year, Pandora paid over $400 million in royalties, which accounted for 44 percent of its revenue. Still the company's CEO Brian P. McAndrews called the judges' decision "a balanced rate that we can work with and grow from."

http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/performance-royalty-rates-increase-for-online-radio-20151217
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Panel of federal judges orders free internet radio services to pay higher royalties for streaming (Original Post) Miles Archer Dec 2015 OP
There, fixed it -none Dec 2015 #1
Simple business response to that whatthehey Dec 2015 #2
They also need to deliver a low bitrate to non-subscribers. Miles Archer Dec 2015 #3
Pretty decent compromise, honestly (nt) Recursion Dec 2015 #4

-none

(1,884 posts)
1. There, fixed it
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 09:56 AM
Dec 2015
The new rates are expected to bring in millions for record companies and artists, though SoundExchange — the non-profit licensing agency representing the labels — had hoped to secure a rate of 25 cents per 100 plays by non-subscribers.


whatthehey

(3,660 posts)
2. Simple business response to that
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 10:21 AM
Dec 2015

Sell and play more ads for non-subscribers to pay for the increased fee band and lower subscription rates to get more people into the reduced fee band.

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
3. They also need to deliver a low bitrate to non-subscribers.
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 10:52 AM
Dec 2015

Some of them do, not sure if all, but 320KBPS should be for paying customers only.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Panel of federal judges o...