General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Shkreli Indictment is, Honestly, Hilarious
Here's the short version: Shkreli set up two "hedge funds" and sought investors for them. They both worked the same way, using three entities:
1) The hedge fund itself, a limited partnership. The investors were limited partners in the fund. There was one general (controlling) partner, which was a limited liability company controlled by Shkreli (see 2)).
2) The limited liability company as general partner of entity 1. This was, essentially, Shkreli himself.
3) A second limited liability company, which served as investment advisor to the limited partnership. This was also Shkreli.
In both cases, the limited partnership sought investors, who put money into it. They paid fees to the general partner (1%) and the investment advisor (20% of profits). Both of those are Shkreli.
So, Shkreli is a partner in entity 1 through his role as controller of entity 2, and he provides advice to entity 1 through his role as controller of entity 3. Now on to the funny part:
Shkreli, far from being a boy genius, is actually really fucking bad at investing.
One of his hedge funds took in $700,000 in investments. A year later, the fund had $700 in assets. That is, he lost $699,300 in trading in one year! Nevertheless, he convinced new investors to put about $3 million back into the fund, mainly by telling them that the fund's assets ($700, mind you) were at $35 MILLION. MILLION! He had seven hundred dollars in the fund and told a potential investor that he had THIRTY-FIVE MILLION. Wait a second...
So, what does he do with the new influx of funds? He promptly loses the $3 million, which turns into $58,000 in less than a month. One reason? He poorly executed a short position that left both him and his brokerage (Merrill) damn near $10 million in the hole! Boy genius! Entrepreneur!
Why is this guy even allowed near a bank account? A random group of American high school sophomores could perform better on the market with a weekend's worth of training. This guy is not only an asshole, he's also a fucking moron.
The last stroke of genius was to use completely made up assets of pharmaceutical company he basically made up in order to pay back the duped investors of the hedge funds, who were, of course, shouting for their money (he told them they'd doubled it, even though he lost it ALL), and there was no money. When it became clear that the company's auditor was going to ask why this publicly traded company was paying these random, unrelated people for DOING NOTHING, he set up fake consulting agreements.
To be honest, any investor in the hedge fund who entered into a fake consulting agreement should also be charged for fraud.
What a piddling shit show.
Laurian
(2,593 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Madoff was actually not investing and losing a dime. His was a straight Ponzi scheme. Shkreli was investing and getting soaked.
That said, he did also withdraw quite a bit for his own purposes (a la Madoff).
still_one
(92,381 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)They are suing him.
It is, nevertheless, hilarious 1) how piddling the whole thing was and 2) how deeply incompetent Shkreli is.
I suppose it will be taken as victim blaming, but I do have to wonder how you fork over $1 million on say-so to somebody like Shkreli. His fund had $700 in it. He told the guy $35 million. I don't care where you're from: that's fucking funny.
still_one
(92,381 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)He had previously "founded" the pharmaceutical companies listed in the indictment as well, one of which did nothing (it was a shell company for asset inflation).
marmar
(77,090 posts)Maybe they pegged him as an unscrupulous hustler and figured he'd be able to boost their returns by any means necessary?
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)He did not.
Still, you'd think somebody would kick the tires before dropping a mill on Martin Shkreli. What the fuck?
There's also a really weird gap: Investor #1 (owed in the area of 1.3 million) requests redemption in writing in January 2012 and still hasn't received it in September, when the second scheme kicks off. You'd think a dude would move faster on that if they're bothering with the certified letter.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,335 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)corkhead
(6,119 posts)in prison
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)I do think he will get at least 18 months in prison for these crimes, though.
groundloop
(11,521 posts)Will it continue to be manufactured and sold at sky high prices?
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Who knows. The general consensus is that Turing is unrelated to these goings-on, but it is very clear that Shkreli used the last "pharma company" (I use the term very loosely) he founded as an asset inflator and general slush-fund for handling the hedge fund losses. The question is whether Turing operates in much the same way for some other con game, apart from the basic evil of the price gouge.
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)And he totally failed with that as another drug company is going to produce an alternative that contains the active ingredient in this asshole's $750 pill for $1. That's even less than what it was before dumbass got involved.
csziggy
(34,137 posts)He really reminds me of the cocaine snorting in The Wolf of Wall Street:
sir pball
(4,758 posts)Bucky
(54,053 posts)at least he's physically safe from his investors and has a chance of eating 3 squares a day
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)The consulting agreements in lieu of ordinary redemption especially sound like no-show construction jobs, ahem. What above-board investor agrees to enter into a fraudulent consulting agreement with a publicly traded company in order to be redeemed for an investment in an unrelated hedge fund? It's hinky as all git out.