Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(113,370 posts)
Tue Dec 22, 2015, 11:23 PM Dec 2015

 The Most Shocking Thing About Trevor FitzGibbon’s Behavior Is How Common It Is

 The Most Shocking Thing About Trevor FitzGibbon’s Behavior Is How Common It Is


Sexual harassment is a reality for far too many women, even in progressive workplaces.







In the days since one of the country’s most powerful PR firms on the left disintegrated amid allegations that its founder, Trevor FitzGibbon, had sexually harassed and assaulted employees and clients alike, many progressives have been scratching their heads and looking inward. How could someone so enmeshed in the movement—whose clients included the AFL-CIO and MoveOn, and even feminist groups NARAL Pro-choice and UltraViolet—himself be such a sexist abuser, as many women are now claiming?

But the news shouldn’t be surprising, even at a progressive organization. It’s only the latest sign that, while it’s technically illegal, sexual harassment still permeates the workplace—regardless of its ideology.

The Civil Rights Act, passed in 1964, laid the groundwork for outlawing sexual harassment, and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the nation’s watchdog for people’s workplace rights, incorporated protection from sexual harassment into its regulations in 1980, making it officially illegal. Most Americans only became acquainted with the fact that harassment is against the law when Anita Hill testified against Clarence Thomas’s nomination to the Supreme Court in 1991. Still, it’s been the law of the land for decades.

Yet, even now, women are regularly victimized by harassers at work. One recent survey of several thousand women by Cosmopolitan magazine found that a third had been sexually harassed at work at some point in their careers. Other polls regularly uncover similar figures; one from 2011 found that a quarter of women had experienced workplace sexual harassment, while another from 2013 found that one in five women had been harassed by a superior and a quarter had been harassed by a coworker.

. . . .

http://www.thenation.com/article/the-most-shocking-thing-about-trevor-fitzgibbons-behavior-is-how-common-it-is/

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 The Most Shocking Thing About Trevor FitzGibbon’s Behavior Is How Common It Is (Original Post) niyad Dec 2015 OP
There are many excellent points brer cat Dec 2015 #1
you are most welcome. sadly, that paragraph is absolutely correct. niyad Dec 2015 #3
Hillary's top donors treat women like shit. Scuba Dec 2015 #2
. . niyad Dec 2015 #4
. . . niyad Dec 2015 #5
you know that guy considered himself an ally of feminists too nt geek tragedy Dec 2015 #6
clearly didn't/doesn't have a clue. niyad Dec 2015 #7
"Progressive" affluent white men can be among the very worst. hunter Dec 2015 #8
sadly, you are quite correct. niyad Dec 2015 #9
Now that's a bad touch. n/t ryan_cats Dec 2015 #10

brer cat

(24,578 posts)
1. There are many excellent points
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 09:03 AM
Dec 2015

covered in this article. This is in reference to earlier accusations against FitzGibbon:

This kind of response—an investigation, a rap on the knuckles, and a promise to keep an eye on the problem while allowing an abuser to keep his position, build his success and continue working alongside those who accused him—has one outcome. It emboldens the abuser, and it silences the abused. It’s also fairly common. Companies don’t have to get lawyers involved and risk any legal fallout. They don’t have to hire a new senior employee. Everything gets swept under the rug.


Thanks for posting, niyad.
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
2. Hillary's top donors treat women like shit.
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 09:11 AM
Dec 2015
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/07/26/2362461/merill-lynch-sexist/

Women At Merrill Lynch Were Instructed To Seduce Their Way To The Top, Lawsuit Alleges

New details have emerged from a bias lawsuit filed by three former employees of Merrill Lynch against the company, which alleges that during training they were instructed to read a book called “Seducing the Boys Club: Uncensored Tactics From a Woman at the Top” and emulate its advice.

The tips in the book, published by New York Magazine’s The Cut, are truly shocking. “I play on masculine pride and natural instincts to protect the weaker sex,” says a section of the book advising women on how to get men to do their work. “Unless he is morbidly obese, there is no man on earth who won’t puff up at this sentence: Wow, you look great. Been working out?” suggests a portion on diffusing tense situations.

...

These demeaning and rather tragic pieces of advice might well be a reality for many women on male-dominated Wall Street. It’s a known Boys’ Club, and Wall Streeters have a track record of using women as scapegoats, instead of treating them as equals. Women are vastly underrepresented in the finance industry — much more so than in other areas — and hold only 8.6 percent of executive officer jobs. Women also earn less than men in finance; the top six jobs with the biggest pay gaps are financial.









Yet she keeps their money and goes back for more.

hunter

(38,318 posts)
8. "Progressive" affluent white men can be among the very worst.
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 01:32 PM
Dec 2015

I'm a white male who has frequent encounters with progressive organizations headed by these sorts.

It's my good fortune to be the child of a matriarchal family where the women don't take any shit. Our family is still like that. A passive- aggressive "shoulder rub" might earn the aggressor a punch in the face. (I don't claim such reactivity is a positive thing, but...)

George W. Bush is a master of this sort of creepiness:



My parents are artists. When I was young, into my early 'twenties, I lived in a very liberal and progressive California arts environment.

But I couldn't help notice the men who still existed within very traditional male dominated family and business structures. Even though they wore the clothes of hippies, listened to rock music, skinny dipped, smoked pot, etc.., proudly proclaiming themselves to be liberals or progressives. Yet aside from the costume, the man was still in charge, the wife was at home cooking dinner, cleaning house, and taking care of the kids, and maybe she had her own arts and activism, which was fine, so long as she didn't make the man of the house, or her "progressive" male bosses look smaller.

I encounter some of these people from my past occasionally, and many remain the misogynistic racist clueless rat-bastards, still believing they are some sort of progressives. Some of them are wealthy too, donating to progressive causes and candidates.

But whenever anyone calls them on their behavior, they have fits.

Even DU reeks of this kind of hypocrisy sometimes.

niyad

(113,370 posts)
9. sadly, you are quite correct.
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 01:35 PM
Dec 2015

I remember that disgusting behavior der chimpenfuhrer exhibited to chancellor merkel.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion» The Most Shockin...