You want to fight obesity, try banning HFCS (high fructose corn syrup)
and especially the stuff that comes from genetically modified corn crops.
Its in everything these days in lieu of sugar. The bad thing it when your body takes in real sugar it says, "yummy, sugar, that was satisfying". When your body takes in fructose it cant process it quick enough and therefore turns it in to fatty triglycerides and says "hey, I could really go for some glucose (sugar)"
You want to ban something, start regulating HFCS. It tastes sweet to the tongue, is cheaper than sugar to make, but turns immediately to fat in the body's system.
Or maybe we could educate people so that they could make informed decisions and not have to criminalize everything that some deem "bad". I'd prefer a Teacher State to a Nanny State anyway.
(steps off of soapbox)
= new reply since forum marked as read
Really? You're funny, keep going upaloopa. 
"personal responsibility"
Sorry no more time for you. 
You are very boring and your manual must be broken.
and too many communities, especially the poor ones, have stores FULL of junk food, with NO access to healthy organically grown produce and products. Schools are serving junk, and our commercial junk food empire, is built around extremely unhealthy food additives that are totally unnecessary to be added to foods.
Unnecessary and toxic additives to food is what happens in unregulated 3rd world countries--because $$ greedy corporations do not regulate themselves, they just want profits and do not care about public health. So these companies will sell junk--and profit in the healthcare industry at the same time when people inevitably suffer consequences from eating too much of these additives.
Regulations are in place to assure that the common citizen has access to clean food and healthy and safe environment on an equal basis to the rich privileged people--THAT is why they are in place.
Adding toxins to food is both irresponsible and delusional--and has NOTHING to do with critical thinking. There is nothing wrong with teaching critical thinking too--this country has too little of it. Critical thinking is great--but so is responsibility to the planet and all the innocent beings living on it. 
when these substances are only empty calories, which cause people to physically and psychologically crave more food since their cells are starving for real nutrients. These additives cause people to crave more of the same empty calories--they taste and smell good--so they are sort of addictive. The result is malnutrition.
So the corporations are falsely advertising these substances as being food staples, sugar should not be eaten with every meal 24/7--instead should be an occasional treat or in much smaller amounts.
I am sure most people agree with all of this--but the argument is not whether HFCS is like sugar or not, it is that many additives, either by themselves or in combination with other substances appear to be highly addictive. If our natural instincts were intact, wouldn't we be craving what our bodies need? I wonder about these things (not providing a link here, just my opinions and observations).
Wishing you and everyone here health and long life I actually respect people at mealtime...but feel strongly about nutrition.
Good video BTW.
[font size=3]
*snip*
High-fructose corn syrup and sucrose are both compounds that contain the simple sugars fructose and glucose, but there at least two clear differences between them. First, sucrose is composed of equal amounts of the two simple sugars -- it is 50 percent fructose and 50 percent glucose -- but the typical high-fructose corn syrup used in this study features a slightly imbalanced ratio, containing 55 percent fructose and 42 percent glucose. Larger sugar molecules called higher saccharides make up the remaining 3 percent of the sweetener. Second, as a result of the manufacturing process for high-fructose corn syrup, the fructose molecules in the sweetener are free and unbound, ready for absorption and utilization. In contrast, every fructose molecule in sucrose that comes from cane sugar or beet sugar is bound to a corresponding glucose molecule and must go through an extra metabolic step before it can be utilized.
This creates a fascinating puzzle. The rats in the Princeton study became obese by drinking high-fructose corn syrup, but not by drinking sucrose. The critical differences in appetite, metabolism and gene expression that underlie this phenomenon are yet to be discovered, but may relate to the fact that excess fructose is being metabolized to produce fat, while glucose is largely being processed for energy or stored as a carbohydrate, called glycogen, in the liver and muscles.
In the 40 years since the introduction of high-fructose corn syrup as a cost-effective sweetener in the American diet, rates of obesity in the U.S. have skyrocketed, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 1970, around 15 percent of the U.S. population met the definition for obesity; today, roughly one-third of the American adults are considered obese, the CDC reported. High-fructose corn syrup is found in a wide range of foods and beverages, including fruit juice, soda, cereal, bread, yogurt, ketchup and mayonnaise. On average, Americans consume 60 pounds of the sweetener per person every year.
MORE
- K&R
HFCS came into use in the late '80s. The "obesity epidemic" didn't show up until 2000.
What happened in 2000? That's when they started shutting down the raves.
Young people in most parts of the country no longer have any place to dance.
Dancing is very good exercise.
