Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mainer

(12,029 posts)
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:47 PM Feb 2016

"LaVoy Finicum was not murdered. He forced police to shoot him."

If you can stand reading a "guns and patriots" website, it's actually a reasonable analysis of why the shooting by OSP was justified, and the opinion is backed up by numerous photos.

Mr. Finicum has long stated that he would not be taken alive. His decision to reach for a weapon on his person forced the Oregon State Police officer (or officers) to fire on Mr. Finicum to defend his own life. This was a textbook defensive gun use by the officer (or officers). His hand motions towards his weapon are very similar to the motions we saw in the enhanced security camera footage from the death of Tamir Rice. Both rice and Finicum made what is called a “furtive gesture,” or a movement that reasonable people in that circumstance would agree is what appears to be an attempt to grab a weapon.

Let’s be very clear on this next point, as well: neither law enforcement officers nor “average Joes” have to wait to see a weapon clearly and fully drawn before engaging someone in this circumstance. If you lawfully have reason to have some at gunpoint and they made a sudden movement like this, you would legally, morally, and ethically be able to justify shooting them.

It is also sadly clear from the video that Victoria Sharp, the young woman who claimed that Finicum was shot while his hands were up was lying. It is also clear that her claim that 100 rounds were fired at the truck is also a bald-faced lie. I strongly suspect that less than a dozen rounds were fired in total, and probably more like 5-6, which we’ll discover soon enough. Keep in mind that the officers covering Finicum’s truck are 5-7 yards away, broadside, in positions around the gray/silver SUV. If they fired 100 rounds at that range, there would be no survivors. It would be like the Timothy Russell/Malissa Williams case, where the car was nearly unrecognizable and each passenger was shot more than 20 times.


http://bearingarms.com/lavoy-finicum-murdered-forced-oregon-police-shoot/
28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"LaVoy Finicum was not murdered. He forced police to shoot him." (Original Post) mainer Feb 2016 OP
There is a remote chance that Finicum was confused by the order to drop his weapon Warpy Feb 2016 #1
But you don't tell a suspect to "drop his weapon"... Whiskeytide Feb 2016 #2
Remote chance, twitchy cops, you needed to read the whole thing Warpy Feb 2016 #5
I agree weird things can happen ... Whiskeytide Feb 2016 #6
That's what you are supposed to do. However I recall a case where an officer was recorded yelling at Glassunion Feb 2016 #9
You're right. Should have said "supposed"... Whiskeytide Feb 2016 #16
He reached TWICE for his jacket.... dixiegrrrrl Feb 2016 #14
By all accounts, he didn't have a weapon in his hand to drop Kaleva Feb 2016 #4
Did you read the article fully? He did have a handgun flamingdem Feb 2016 #8
Did you read my post? Kaleva Feb 2016 #17
got it nt flamingdem Feb 2016 #18
I hadn't thought of that, maybe he did think he had to surrender the pistol flamingdem Feb 2016 #10
Yeah, that's about all I can think the eyewitnesses are basing their howls of "murder!" on Warpy Feb 2016 #15
Suicide by police, yortsed snacilbuper Feb 2016 #3
I was wondering if Lavoy did reach for a gun, he did flamingdem Feb 2016 #7
He wasn't reaching for a gun Mendocino Feb 2016 #11
Or a snack flamingdem Feb 2016 #19
I thought he was reaching for one of the dildos he stole from Jon Ritzheimer snooper2 Feb 2016 #25
He wanted to fool the cops into thinking he was reaching for the gun, then shoot him. greyl Feb 2016 #20
But they say they found his handgun? flamingdem Feb 2016 #21
Right, I had just clarified that to non-brandishing, not unarmed. :) nt greyl Feb 2016 #22
If he had only listened to more Richard Pryor hollowdweller Feb 2016 #12
This is what I was saying about the officer on the left. Also, if they shot 100 times at the truck, uppityperson Feb 2016 #13
I am repeatedly stunned as hell Aerows Feb 2016 #23
militia fans say the cop intentionally "dived into the path of the car" mainer Feb 2016 #24
Some idiots actually tried to advance that theory? Aerows Feb 2016 #27
Yes, they're advancing the theory that the cop "jumped in front of the vehicle." mainer Feb 2016 #28
Not that I want to watch it again 2naSalit Feb 2016 #26

Warpy

(111,339 posts)
1. There is a remote chance that Finicum was confused by the order to drop his weapon
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:57 PM
Feb 2016

which is given in all cases like this, and thought he needed to take it out to drop it. That was his fatal mistake if that's what happened. We will never know, none of us is reliably telepathic. That's the most sympathetic reading anyone could give after watching that video.

Bottom line is that he reached for his gun. As twitchy as the cops are these days, and especially when confronting heavily armed right wingers, reaching for anything can get you killed. Best policy is to get on the ground, hands on your head, and tell them which pocket contains what, letting them find it.

Whiskeytide

(4,462 posts)
2. But you don't tell a suspect to "drop his weapon"...
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 03:10 PM
Feb 2016

... When he already has his hands up. You tell him to lie down, cuff him, and THEN disarm him. He moved from the vehicle with his hands up to protect the occupants of the vehicle from the firefight (I suppose that was a fairly decent act). When he felt he was far enough away and had an officer confronting him, he went for his gun. He didn't see the officer behind him. There was no other reason for him to exit his vehicle and stride away from it with the purpose he exhibited.

Warpy

(111,339 posts)
5. Remote chance, twitchy cops, you needed to read the whole thing
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 03:26 PM
Feb 2016

It almost looked like he went spread eagled in the snow, then got up on his knees to reach for the gun. It's fairly far fetched but weirder things have been known to happen when everybody is running on coffee and adrenaline.

Whiskeytide

(4,462 posts)
6. I agree weird things can happen ...
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 05:28 PM
Feb 2016

... but what I saw on the video seemed pretty straight forward. I didn't see him go down and get back up again - he just seemed to be struggling to walk through the snow bank.

But -if you want to surrender, don't get out of the vehicle until you're told to do so. If you want to surrender, don't stride away from the vehicle toward LEOs. If you want to surrender, keep your hands up and say "I surrender, I surrender" ... even if some inexperienced or adrenaline fueled cop says "drop your gun" (which I just seriously doubt). You don't just go reaching for your weapon when you're in a confrontation with the cops if you want to surrender! You do that because you're drawing in a gunfight. It's basic common sense.

And I think this guy thought he could out duel the cop in front of him. I'm not buying the suicide by cop crap. I think he had deluded himself into thinking he was some kind of reincarnation of Doc Holiday (to Bundy's Wyatt Earp), and he was gonna get him a huckleberry.

I'm never happy someone gets dead. But this man was a monumental idiot, and his wish to die rather than be captured was granted to him by his own actions.

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
9. That's what you are supposed to do. However I recall a case where an officer was recorded yelling at
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 05:50 PM
Feb 2016

a suspect repeatedly to "drop your gun" and "put your gun on the ground", to a suspect who was on their knees, with their empty hands over their head.

When the suspect complied with the officers request he was shot dead.

In court the officer testified that they did not recall giving the suspect those orders, even after hearing the recording of himself giving that order.

Whiskeytide

(4,462 posts)
16. You're right. Should have said "supposed"...
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 07:38 PM
Feb 2016

... I also remember a suspect being asked for his license and being shot as he reached into his glove box for his license.

But I still think the video tells the story that Finicum drew fire on himself. If more comes to light - like an audio, maybe? - I will rethink it. Until then, I'm thinking its a simple case of he fought the law and the law won.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
14. He reached TWICE for his jacket....
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 06:27 PM
Feb 2016

and the 2nd time, partially turned towards the officer who fired the shot.

I watched the video dozens of times, over and over, esp. that bit.
In zoom.

Kaleva

(36,342 posts)
4. By all accounts, he didn't have a weapon in his hand to drop
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 03:16 PM
Feb 2016

Now if he had a gun in his hand, an order to drop it would make sense.

flamingdem

(39,321 posts)
8. Did you read the article fully? He did have a handgun
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 05:49 PM
Feb 2016

Once the vehicle is clear, officers and agents then check on LaVoy Finicum’s condition, though he appears to have been deceased from just seconds after being shot. It is later said that a 9mm pistol was recovered from the inside left pocket of Finicum’s coat.

Kaleva

(36,342 posts)
17. Did you read my post?
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 07:43 PM
Feb 2016

I said that by all accounts, Finicum didn't have a gun in his hand. Thus an order to drop his weapon wouldn't have made sense as he had nothing in his hand to drop.

flamingdem

(39,321 posts)
10. I hadn't thought of that, maybe he did think he had to surrender the pistol
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 05:50 PM
Feb 2016

Oh well Lavoy, bad luck.

Warpy

(111,339 posts)
15. Yeah, that's about all I can think the eyewitnesses are basing their howls of "murder!" on
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 07:35 PM
Feb 2016

It's rubbish, of course, the dope reached for his gun. That would get him shot anywhere in the country and under most circumstances these days.

flamingdem

(39,321 posts)
7. I was wondering if Lavoy did reach for a gun, he did
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 05:48 PM
Feb 2016

Once the vehicle is clear, officers and agents then check on LaVoy Finicum’s condition, though he appears to have been deceased from just seconds after being shot. It is later said that a 9mm pistol was recovered from the inside left pocket of Finicum’s coat.

greyl

(22,990 posts)
20. He wanted to fool the cops into thinking he was reaching for the gun, then shoot him.
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 12:55 AM
Feb 2016

He wanted to be unarmed (by that I mean holstered, not brandished weapon) while shot to try to incriminate the authorities in an unjustified shooting, furthering his martyrdom.
One point a little to his credit, I think when he exited the truck he might have been trying to get into a clear spot away from his mates. At some point before he took off from the first road block, he probably heard the others with him weren't in the mood for a shootout just then.

This is all speculation, of course.

flamingdem

(39,321 posts)
21. But they say they found his handgun?
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 12:58 AM
Feb 2016

The other theory is that he thought they wanted him to surrender his weapon so he was going to dump it on the ground. If so, poor Lavoy, not too bright I'd say. If it were any of us we'd have those hands very, very high the whole time.

I can't quite buy he wanted suicide by cop, maybe a bullet in the arm to show off.

uppityperson

(115,679 posts)
13. This is what I was saying about the officer on the left. Also, if they shot 100 times at the truck,
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 06:15 PM
Feb 2016

they were very poor shots to miss that many times from so close.

The OSP officer behind the tailgate of the dark pickup darts towards Finicum’s truck as it hits the snowbank. While it’s purely speculation on my park, I’m assuming that he expected Finicum’s pickup to carom off the snow back into the pickup, and he was trying to get clear of the vehicle.
 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
23. I am repeatedly stunned as hell
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 01:06 AM
Feb 2016

that no one mentions that he nearly ran an officer down. The man dived out of the way.

LaVoy nearly *ran a man down trying to evade a road block*.

If that isn't probable cause that Finicum was prone to violence, then I guess I should punch somebody in the mouth then claim their jaw injured my fist.

It's ludicrous.

mainer

(12,029 posts)
24. militia fans say the cop intentionally "dived into the path of the car"
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 12:21 PM
Feb 2016

to get himself hit so that he could claim Finicum attacked him.

Sure, they teach you that strategy in cop school. Jump in front of a speeding car, so we can charge the perp!

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
27. Some idiots actually tried to advance that theory?
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 04:17 PM
Feb 2016

My goodness. How detached from reality would you have to be to believe that cops purposefully attempt to get hit by cars?

mainer

(12,029 posts)
28. Yes, they're advancing the theory that the cop "jumped in front of the vehicle."
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 08:56 PM
Feb 2016

Just wade through those awful comments under the OP article link.

2naSalit

(86,775 posts)
26. Not that I want to watch it again
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 01:21 PM
Feb 2016

but in the video, I think I saw the officer who was nearly run down got into the woods and then came out of the woods and shot RLF as he was reaching for his weapon.

If that is the case, the officer who shot RLF did so in self defense upon the second attempt on his life.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"LaVoy Finicum was not mu...