General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow did JebusEnoughFuggingBushes raise the issue of eminent domain?
Eminent Domain laws were passed under which administration. Who headed the Federal government, who pushed it and and who were the governors who pushed it - from which party?
http://edition.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/05/08/cheney.trans/
<snip>
KING: Well, let's talk about that infrastructure. It's a difficult word. You say we need to add 1,300 to 1,900 refineries in this country, power plants -- I'm sorry -- on the electricity side and then a number of refineries, well over a 20-year strategy. How do you get local governments to do that? And there's a term that's used often, NIMBY, an acronym in Washington, not in my backyard.
How you going to convince state and local governments to do this? And will this report call for, essentially, the power of eminent domain? When the state wants to build a highway, it says, "We're taking your house." When the state wants to build a new factory, it says, "We're taking your house." Is the federal government prepared to say, "We will take your house, because we need to build new power transmission lines and new gas pipelines."
CHENEY: Well, the federal government already has the authority, eminent domain authority, with respect to gas pipelines; FERC has that authority. The issue is whether or not we should have the same authority on electrical transmission lines, that's never been granted previously. That's one of the issues we've looked at. We'll have a recommendation when we release the report next week.
------------------
I would have destroyed JebusEnoughFuggingBushes.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Bush trying to pass it off as 'public'.
No, giant corporations making tons of money for their shareholders is not 'public'. If the government owned the KXL and all the money actually WENT to the public, then yeah, maybe it would be 'public', even if the public didn't want it.
malaise
(269,045 posts)I didn't watch the entire debate. It was too much for me.
Kilgore
(1,733 posts)It's granted by the FERC, federal energy regulatory commission, to projects that fulfill a public need. Here is a link,
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certificate_of_public_convenience_and_necessity
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Kind of a vague phrase, that. You could claim just about anything 'fulfills a public need'. Which is how Trump evicted that widow using it.
packman
(16,296 posts)I moved to the D.C. area in the early 60's. The Beltway, a loop around the city, was in its early phases - a bit here, a bit there- with local roads still being used until final completion. Areas condemned, houses torn down, farms acquired (yes, farms), all the necessary stuff to build that magical circle around the capitol.
And when it was done , it had an interesting "kink" in that circle. As you travel east around the top of the Beltway, it makes a dog-leg around the Chevy Chase area - homes of the then aristocrats, ambassadors, senators, and congressmen - in short, the wealthiest of the wealthiest. Damn if they were going to have a highway thru their neighborhood.
Note how at top center the Beltway takes a southern turn and then a bit later a northern twist to rejoin the circle.
malaise
(269,045 posts)That's for us peons