Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 892 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
#UberSuperBowlSTRIKE (Original Post)
FrodosPet
Feb 2016
OP
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)1. Given that Uber drivers are independent freelancers who work as much or as little as they like,
I guess I don't really get the concept of these folk "striking".
OrwellwasRight
(5,170 posts)2. For better pay and conditions, same as any workers.
Uber drivers are only "independent" in neoliberal fantasyland.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)3. They might not be I.C.s much longer
http://uberlawsuit.com/
Uber drivers have filed a class action lawsuit claiming they have been misclassified as independent contractors and are entitled to be reimbursed for their expenses that Uber should have to pay, like for gas and vehicle maintenance. The lawsuit also challenges Ubers practice of telling passengers that the gratuity is included and not to tip the drivers, even though you are not getting a tip!!
The case has been set to begin trial on June 20, 2016! Uber has asked the court to delay the trial pending its appeals and the court has denied that request. On January 27, 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals also denied Uber's request to delay the trial.
We won a major victory on March 11, 2015, when the judge overseeing the case, Judge Edward M. Chen, of the federal district court in San Francisco, denied Ubers motion for summary judgment! In his decision, the judge agreed with many of our arguments about why Uber drivers may be properly classified as employees. Under the courts order, the case will go to trial before a jury. See the news stories below for reports on the ruling.
We won another important victory on December 9, 2015, when the court issued its final order certifying the case as a class action. Under this decision, the case will now include all drivers who have contracted with Uber directly and in their own name (not through intermediate companies) in California since 2009.
~ snip ~
Uber drivers have filed a class action lawsuit claiming they have been misclassified as independent contractors and are entitled to be reimbursed for their expenses that Uber should have to pay, like for gas and vehicle maintenance. The lawsuit also challenges Ubers practice of telling passengers that the gratuity is included and not to tip the drivers, even though you are not getting a tip!!
The case has been set to begin trial on June 20, 2016! Uber has asked the court to delay the trial pending its appeals and the court has denied that request. On January 27, 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals also denied Uber's request to delay the trial.
We won a major victory on March 11, 2015, when the judge overseeing the case, Judge Edward M. Chen, of the federal district court in San Francisco, denied Ubers motion for summary judgment! In his decision, the judge agreed with many of our arguments about why Uber drivers may be properly classified as employees. Under the courts order, the case will go to trial before a jury. See the news stories below for reports on the ruling.
We won another important victory on December 9, 2015, when the court issued its final order certifying the case as a class action. Under this decision, the case will now include all drivers who have contracted with Uber directly and in their own name (not through intermediate companies) in California since 2009.
~ snip ~