Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
#UberSuperBowlSTRIKE (Original Post) FrodosPet Feb 2016 OP
Given that Uber drivers are independent freelancers who work as much or as little as they like, Nye Bevan Feb 2016 #1
For better pay and conditions, same as any workers. OrwellwasRight Feb 2016 #2
They might not be I.C.s much longer FrodosPet Feb 2016 #3

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
1. Given that Uber drivers are independent freelancers who work as much or as little as they like,
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 07:13 PM
Feb 2016

I guess I don't really get the concept of these folk "striking".

OrwellwasRight

(5,170 posts)
2. For better pay and conditions, same as any workers.
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 07:17 PM
Feb 2016

Uber drivers are only "independent" in neoliberal fantasyland.

FrodosPet

(5,169 posts)
3. They might not be I.C.s much longer
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 08:11 PM
Feb 2016
http://uberlawsuit.com/


Uber drivers have filed a class action lawsuit claiming they have been misclassified as independent contractors and are entitled to be reimbursed for their expenses that Uber should have to pay, like for gas and vehicle maintenance. The lawsuit also challenges Uber’s practice of telling passengers that the gratuity is included and not to tip the drivers, even though you are not getting a tip!!

The case has been set to begin trial on June 20, 2016! Uber has asked the court to delay the trial pending its appeals and the court has denied that request. On January 27, 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals also denied Uber's request to delay the trial.

We won a major victory on March 11, 2015, when the judge overseeing the case, Judge Edward M. Chen, of the federal district court in San Francisco, denied Uber’s motion for summary judgment! In his decision, the judge agreed with many of our arguments about why Uber drivers may be properly classified as employees. Under the court’s order, the case will go to trial before a jury. See the news stories below for reports on the ruling.

We won another important victory on December 9, 2015, when the court issued its final order certifying the case as a class action. Under this decision, the case will now include all drivers who have contracted with Uber directly and in their own name (not through intermediate companies) in California since 2009.

~ snip ~

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»#UberSuperBowlSTRIKE