Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGitHub Users Find Women's Code Better Than Men's — Until They Know Who Wrote It
http://www.bustle.com/articles/141667-github-users-find-womens-code-better-than-mens-until-they-know-who-wrote-itWith all the recent talk about women lagging behind in STEM fields, it may be tempting to assume that, whether due to biology or socialization, women are just not performing as well. But that would be wrong: The Github community actually approves more code by women... until they know it's by women. A new study published inPeerJfound that software developers on GitHub respond to contributions differently when they know there are women behind them.
The way GitHub works, developers can collaborate on one another's projects, and each project's creator can decide to accept or reject someone else's contribution. When the researchers looked at requests to contribute code, they found that about 79 percent of those by women and 75 percent of those by men were accepted. In fact, women's requests were approved more for all the top ten programming languages. But, of course, there was a catch.
GitHub users all have profiles, which can reveal varying amounts of information about them. Some include photos where their gender (or at least their perceived gender) is identifiable, while others don't, and some use their real names, while others create usernames that don't reveal their identities.
And here's the kicker: when women's genders were clear and their potential collaborators didn't already know them, their acceptance was suddenly lower than men's at 62.5 percent. So, basically, people judged the code they once considered superior as inferiorwhen they knew it was written by women.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 805 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GitHub Users Find Women's Code Better Than Men's — Until They Know Who Wrote It (Original Post)
WhiteTara
Feb 2016
OP
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)1. Ugh
This reminds me of this:
http://jezebel.com/homme-de-plume-what-i-learned-sending-my-novel-out-und-1720637627
Ive seen this in the field of VFX too.
WhiteTara
(29,718 posts)3. depressing, isn't it?
Warpy
(111,270 posts)2. The more things change....
In the mid 60s, papers I submitted in engineering school with my initials on them got a full letter grade higher than papers with my name on them.
Stupid gender bias has not changed. It needs to. Clean up your act, guys.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)4. Not many women in my field.
"Male dominated".
But the women I have worked with, on an average waaaay beyond that of men, were brilliant...and great collaborators.