General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan Obama make a recess appointment to Supreme Court
It has happened in the past with Justice Earl Warren. The senate is on break from Feb 13-21.
Then the Democrats can slow walk any confirmation until the election. Hopefully we win.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)It will never happen.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,350 posts)Maybe with a couple of senators?
LiberalArkie
(15,719 posts)kairos12
(12,862 posts)TeddyR
(2,493 posts)Be a terrible idea. Destroy any civility left in Congress
eggplant
(3,911 posts)GaYellowDawg
(4,447 posts)There hasn't been any civility there since Ken Starr.
LonePirate
(13,426 posts)If they actually did adjourn, Obama should appoint a replacement immediately, such as today.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)House Floor Activities
Legislative Day of February 12, 2016:
Last Floor Action:
1:50:12 P.M. - The House adjourned pursuant to S. Con. Res. 31. The next meeting is scheduled for 2:00 p.m. on February 23, 2016.
LonePirate
(13,426 posts)Fuck the GOP.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)it's the Senate and I very much doubt they'll go into recess now.
LonePirate
(13,426 posts)S.Con.Res.31 - A concurrent resolution providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and an adjournment of the House of Representatives.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)cascadiance
(19,537 posts)The article notes that the longest it has ever taken to appoint a replacement for a SCOTUS justice has been 125 days. Obama has 361 days (almost a year) left in office now.
I guess even if Republicans block him from nominating anyone until after the election, there's no way there would be a Supreme Court able now to vote to stop a recount at a state level like they did in 2000 with the court split 4-4 now. So the 2000 election under the current supreme court might have given the election to Gore without them being able to intervene.
Stinky The Clown
(67,808 posts)Not sure if the officially adjourned.
tritsofme
(17,380 posts)former9thward
(32,025 posts)The Senate will not formally recess. The SC has already rejected Obama's attempt to do recess appointments when the Senate is in pro-forma sessions.
cap
(7,170 posts)Senate completes its business on
Friday, February 12, 2016, it adjourn, to then convene for pro forma
sessions only, with no business being conducted on the following dates
and times, and that following each pro forma session, the Senate
adjourn until the next pro forma session: Monday, February 15, 2016, at
11:00 a.m., -- from senate calendar
Technically today, tomorrow, and Monday till 11 am the senate is out of session....
I wonder if a weekend counts or not
former9thward
(32,025 posts)And it was rejected.
In a rebuke to President Barack Obama, the Supreme Court struck down three of his recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board as unconstitutional.
The decision Thursday gives the Senate broad power to thwart future recess appointments, but did not go as far as some conservatives hoped to undercut the presidents ability to fill vacant executive branch posts and judicial slots.
The court ruled 9-0 that Obamas appointments were unconstitutional because the Senate was not truly in recess when he made them during a three-day break in pro forma meetings of the legislative body.
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/06/supreme-court-recess-appointments-108347#ixzz405pxeYlr