Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spanone

(135,873 posts)
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 07:13 PM Feb 2016

More Republicans Say They’ll Block Supreme Court Nomination

WASHINGTON — Justice Antonin Scalia’s death has given President Obama a tantalizing opportunity to reshape the Supreme Court, but cementing a lasting legacy on American jurisprudence will present a familiar challenge: breaking the will of Republicans.

On Monday, Senate Republicans — including some who are up for re-election in swing states — appeared to be closing ranks with Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, who has vowed to block any nominee from Mr. Obama and has said that he should not even suggest one, leaving the choice to the next president.

Senator Rob Portman, Republican of Ohio, who faces re-election this year, backed that position on Monday. “It is common practice for the Senate to stop acting on lifetime appointments during the last year of a presidential term, and it’s been nearly 80 years since any president was permitted to immediately fill a vacancy that arose in a presidential election year,” he said in a statement. Senator Pat Toomey, Republican of Pennsylvania, who also faces re-election, said he, too, backed a delay.

Senator Kelly Ayotte, Republican of New Hampshire, who faces a primary threat from the right wing of her party, said over the weekend that she supported Mr. McConnell. And several conservative groups have begun to mobilize around the issue, which is already animating activists.


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/16/us/politics/more-republicans-say-theyll-block-supreme-court-nomination.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
2. Every Republican is going to have this stuff hanging over their head this election season
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 07:21 PM
Feb 2016

They have shut down the whole government because they couldn't have their way and wanted to sidestep democracy. Now this. It should be interesting.

C_U_L8R

(45,020 posts)
3. Thank you republicans
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 07:22 PM
Feb 2016

You republicans may be unAmerican dipshits but you're guaranteeing
a magnificent Democratic turnout in the general election.
We will kick your obstructionist asses to the curb.
It's called progress, get used to it.

Beartracks

(12,821 posts)
5. "Common practice" to not do lifetime appointments in election year?
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 07:33 PM
Feb 2016

Uh.... Is that for real?

Sounds like more Republican made-up bullshit.

===============

spanone

(135,873 posts)
6. you may ask.....so are senators blocked from voting on any lifetime legislation in an election year?
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 07:34 PM
Feb 2016

assholes, one and all

 

saturnsring

(1,832 posts)
7. "The U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 2, Clause 2 says presidents nominate justices to the Supr
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 08:15 PM
Feb 2016

"The U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 2, Clause 2 says presidents nominate justices to the Supreme Court. It says the president SHALL and does not say MAY. This means it is not an option.

Zing Zing Zingbah

(6,496 posts)
8. I knew Susan Collins wouldn't jump on board with this baloney.
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 08:28 PM
Feb 2016

That just isn't her style. She's one of the few respectable republicans left. NH needs to ditch Ayotte.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
9. Bluster bluster bluster...they're just waiting to see who will have to vote for it
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 08:29 PM
Feb 2016

It's all positioning now.

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
10. Posturing, nothing more, to try to get a more conservative nominee. Stupid in any other context and
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 08:39 PM
Feb 2016

politically self-inflicting damages too. They know Obama will nominate, they jump this fast out front because they want to influence the choice. Otherwise, what's the damn hurry, better to mot even mention it if you really want to stall.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»More Republicans Say They...