Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,018 posts)
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 03:21 PM Feb 2016

White House Says Obama Will Skip Scalia's Funeral

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said Wednesday that President Barack Obama doesn't plan to attend the funeral for Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.

Earnest said Obama and his wife, First Lady Michelle Obama, would "pay their respects" to Justice Scalia on Friday at the Supreme Court as he lies in repose. He said Vice President Joe Biden and his wife Jill planned to attend the funeral on Saturday.

"The President obviously believes it's important for the institution of the presidency to pay his respects to somebody who dedicated three decades of his life to the institution of the Supreme Court," Earnest said.

Scalia died Saturday at age 79 while on a hunting trip in Texas.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/obama-wont-attend-scalia-funeral




seems fitting to me:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/three-conservative-supreme-court-justices-skip-state-of-the-union-2016/

94 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House Says Obama Will Skip Scalia's Funeral (Original Post) kpete Feb 2016 OP
I don't blame him. The haters will be out there in force. Let them oasis Feb 2016 #1
Fuck them. He's the president. He should show up and eulogize Scalia. Bucky Feb 2016 #39
No reason why he should go randys1 Feb 2016 #53
No, BIDEN should jberryhill Feb 2016 #57
Scalia is not a threat to Obama or Biden as long as they're wearing their garlic Bucky Feb 2016 #59
Yeah, well, a zombie outbreak starting with the attendees there would be devastating jberryhill Feb 2016 #60
So will I. I'm in good company, apparently. MineralMan Feb 2016 #2
Crank up the Faux News Machine about disrespect. kairos12 Feb 2016 #3
I'd gladly pay Mr Justice Scalia my respects... malthaussen Feb 2016 #4
He's going to be lying in state at the Court on Fri.... JudyM Feb 2016 #5
scalia did not provide service to america but interference and destruction MariaThinks Feb 2016 #6
Makes sense since Lenord Nimoy organized the hit so Obama could have a pagan sacrifice. Katashi_itto Feb 2016 #7
Isn't it true that... CincyDem Feb 2016 #26
:) Katashi_itto Feb 2016 #90
He's going to the Supreme Court to pay his respects and that is enough. WI_DEM Feb 2016 #8
To honor the court and the office. It is enough. Agree. Hortensis Feb 2016 #36
Yes it is! burrowowl Feb 2016 #88
Post removed Post removed Feb 2016 #9
If I'm not allowed to desecrate the corpse, then I'm not going either. Orrex Feb 2016 #10
4/7 out of the past 7 funerals for a jusice have had either then president or VP in attendance WI_DEM Feb 2016 #11
It is very bad optics nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #16
If he was Chief Justice, I would agree. Myrina Feb 2016 #18
It is not about owing a thing nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #20
I'll go out on a limb and say it has zero impact on political divisions in this country BeyondGeography Feb 2016 #27
I will go out on a limb and say that it will indeed nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #31
"Slow pace civil war", great way to phrase that, nadin. The media has been blasting us with their Dont call me Shirley Feb 2016 #72
Further division? FUCK that! ALL division comes from the right, for KRIST sake randys1 Feb 2016 #55
You might want to be precise in your words and say MOST nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #58
NO division between Obama and the right is his fault..period randys1 Feb 2016 #61
Yup, becuase we all know a fight only takes one side nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #65
Only one side met the day he was elected and plotted to destroy him and the country if randys1 Feb 2016 #67
So, I know, I have written on that nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #69
Obama has done NOTHING but appease and compromise, and that is STILL not good enough randys1 Feb 2016 #71
And this is one of those where showing up and being the adult in the room nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #73
Agree n/t SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2016 #64
Biden was a part of Scalia's confirmation process jberryhill Feb 2016 #51
Well I am sorry if the terrarists do not scare me nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #52
Well, tough nuts jberryhill Feb 2016 #54
And that is the way it is nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #62
I believe Biden will demonstrate the wisdom of this choice - stay tuned jberryhill Feb 2016 #66
I said my piece nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #70
He could use that Mark Twain qoute he didn't attend the funeral but approves of it Person 2713 Feb 2016 #12
Good move by Obama. Paladin Feb 2016 #13
Bad optics if you want to claim to be above partisanship nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #14
If I Were The Family, I Don't Think I'd Want Him There ProfessorGAC Feb 2016 #17
You never been around a veep visit I take it nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #19
But, I Have Been In The Same Room. . . ProfessorGAC Feb 2016 #92
As I said, if such a request exists, respect it, and MAKE IT PUBLIC nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #94
bad optics only to you Solomon Feb 2016 #37
This is not about respect to Scalia nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #41
Only fair, since Tony skipped out on Obama's SOTU's. nt deminks Feb 2016 #15
Scalia did not attend anyone's SOTU addresses for 20 years onenote Feb 2016 #23
I don't think the Supremes should go to State of the Union Addresses Yupster Feb 2016 #68
I wish we went back to the early 20th century delivery nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #74
I agree Yupster Feb 2016 #87
OK.. go ahead and climb my ass, but... Bigmack Feb 2016 #21
I agree with you: Nixon and Earl Warren onenote Feb 2016 #25
Earl Warren was chief justice. Solomon Feb 2016 #38
We may agree, but it's not the President's role to make such distinctions onenote Feb 2016 #43
He's not good to you because you disagreed with his politics Reter Feb 2016 #85
I'd be tempted to go just to make sure hifiguy Feb 2016 #22
He should go, to make sure he's really dead... n/t backscatter712 Feb 2016 #24
The poking with a stick test never fails. nt Guy Whitey Corngood Feb 2016 #29
No. You hold a mirror under their nose or close to the mouth to see if it fogs. Liberal Veteran Feb 2016 #34
Jab a pin in the neck hifiguy Feb 2016 #44
Great idea.. I volunteer. mountain grammy Feb 2016 #80
I don't buy it for a second. This is all a dirty Guy Whitey Corngood Feb 2016 #28
Yessiree you know it! Not foolin anyone Person 2713 Feb 2016 #75
I would assume that it is because of other priorities jberryhill Feb 2016 #30
what concerns me is that Press Sec'y Josh Earnest ducked a question about whether Obama onenote Feb 2016 #40
He may not know jberryhill Feb 2016 #42
I'd be shocked if the Press Secretary didn't have a pretty clear idea of the President's schedule onenote Feb 2016 #45
Can we wait for reality to catch up before decrying the golf game jberryhill Feb 2016 #48
Funeral of State Sen. Clementa Pickney. Funeral of Senator Inouye. onenote Feb 2016 #49
Biden was much more important to Scalia's career and memory jberryhill Feb 2016 #50
I don't buy the security point at all. onenote Feb 2016 #83
DING, DING, DING, DING nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #89
That is my point about optics nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #56
Obama would be criticized no matter what the decision. Just look at this conversation. Frustratedlady Feb 2016 #82
The haters will hate whether he attended or not Plus Scalia hated Obama's guts and did everything Monk06 Feb 2016 #32
Kudos Mr. President! monicaangela Feb 2016 #33
Scalia was an enemy of the people of America tabasco Feb 2016 #35
And presumably you condemn Obama's decision to attend the wake on Friday onenote Feb 2016 #46
Presume whatever you like. tabasco Feb 2016 #47
Here's Bush attending Ted Kennedy's funeral Reter Feb 2016 #86
Whachya doin' Saturday Joe? KatyMan Feb 2016 #63
I'd spit on his body. kimbutgar Feb 2016 #76
I wonder what would happen if Obama did that Reter Feb 2016 #84
good decision -- respectful oldandhappy Feb 2016 #77
I think that is appropriate Skittles Feb 2016 #78
Obama killed him Politicalboi Feb 2016 #79
I think I'll skip it too... mountain grammy Feb 2016 #81
Obama's put up with a ton of abuse from righties for 7 years. Let him have this. senz Feb 2016 #91
Scalia openly disrespected Obama during his SOTU speech Orrex Feb 2016 #93

oasis

(49,409 posts)
1. I don't blame him. The haters will be out there in force. Let them
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 03:28 PM
Feb 2016

pay homage to the guy who installed Bush ll, and with him, 9/11, Iraq War, economic downturn.

No tv either for the lying hypocrite Scalia.

Bucky

(54,068 posts)
39. Fuck them. He's the president. He should show up and eulogize Scalia.
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 06:54 PM
Feb 2016

This is the perfect opportunity to show he's the leader of the whole country and appointing the best qualified replacement is his constitutional duty. Let the Grumpy Old Party of spoiled brats whine and politicize and anklebite all they want. Obama is the president everywhere he goes and should always play it classy.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
57. No, BIDEN should
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 07:50 PM
Feb 2016


Biden was ranking minority member of the Judiciary Committee when Scalia was confirmed.

Biden is a far more important figure to the life, memory and career of Scalia.

Given the likely attendance of this thing, there are legitimate security concerns about having them both there.

Bucky

(54,068 posts)
59. Scalia is not a threat to Obama or Biden as long as they're wearing their garlic
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 07:53 PM
Feb 2016

I mean, come on, this is the 21st century. You think the Secret Service doesn't have silver bullets for these occasions?

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
60. Yeah, well, a zombie outbreak starting with the attendees there would be devastating
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 07:56 PM
Feb 2016

I had thought of that.

But, seriously, where is this thing being held. Because it would have to be very, very, very secure. Even during the SOTU, there are people who are specifically chosen to be kept at a secure location *cough* Mt. Weather *cough* just in case something happens - and that's been going on a long time.

CincyDem

(6,386 posts)
26. Isn't it true that...
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 05:09 PM
Feb 2016


... BHO can't attend the funeral because, at the exact moment in which the priest says "unto you we commend his spirit"...BHO and Leonard Nimoy have to effectuate a Vulcan Mind Meld in the Washington Temple of the Illumanati.

I don't know...just what I heard on Rush.

LOL


Response to kpete (Original post)

WI_DEM

(33,497 posts)
11. 4/7 out of the past 7 funerals for a jusice have had either then president or VP in attendance
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 04:22 PM
Feb 2016

Four out of the past seven funerals for a Supreme Court justice have either had the president or vice president in attendance.

So not like the first time the president hasn't attended a USSC Justice funeral. Of course the Republicans and some in the MSM will attack him for this.

Myrina

(12,296 posts)
18. If he was Chief Justice, I would agree.
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 04:44 PM
Feb 2016

But Scalia was not Chief Justice. VP will be there to represent the Executive Branch. POTUS owes him nothing.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
20. It is not about owing a thing
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 04:48 PM
Feb 2016

Well except to the country

This just further divisions and for nothing to gain

BeyondGeography

(39,380 posts)
27. I'll go out on a limb and say it has zero impact on political divisions in this country
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 05:11 PM
Feb 2016

If anything, his attendance would be seen as hypocritical and inflammatory.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
31. I will go out on a limb and say that it will indeed
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 05:22 PM
Feb 2016

But whatever. It is getting to the point where this slow pace civil war will have to stop or go hot

Dont call me Shirley

(10,998 posts)
72. "Slow pace civil war", great way to phrase that, nadin. The media has been blasting us with their
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 08:06 PM
Feb 2016

Civil war references (even a SuperBowl commercial had the audacity to reference it by word) since bush2 stole the office.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
58. You might want to be precise in your words and say MOST
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 07:51 PM
Feb 2016

the dems, while less guilty, are not completely without guilt on this one.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
65. Yup, becuase we all know a fight only takes one side
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 07:59 PM
Feb 2016

sorry, people who are far more neutral than you in this, and observe congress and DC for a living do not agree with you. Sorry, tough, but Dems have a smidgen of responsibility on this one. And one way to show they really mean to end this, is attend a fucking funeral.

This has not one thing to do with scalia. but THE OFFICE he represents.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
67. Only one side met the day he was elected and plotted to destroy him and the country if
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 08:00 PM
Feb 2016

necessary

He has acted like a true professional and they have acted like traitors, period

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
69. So, I know, I have written on that
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 08:02 PM
Feb 2016

who said recently that one of his regrets was the deepening partisanship? Oh wait, that was the president.

You want a hot civil war? Because that is where these slow cold civil wars tend to end up at.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
73. And this is one of those where showing up and being the adult in the room
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 08:07 PM
Feb 2016

goes a long way in political capital and good will. Not showing up is not going to look good.

The only reason the President, regardless of party, should not show is if the family made such a request, In which case, Josh Ernst should be a good press secretary and tell us.

This is not compromise, you confuse that, for being the adult in the room.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
51. Biden was a part of Scalia's confirmation process
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 07:42 PM
Feb 2016

Joe Biden is much more significant, of the two, to go to this memorial, and I don't think we want the whole Supreme Court, a good chunk of the Senate, and the President and VP in one place at one time.
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
52. Well I am sorry if the terrarists do not scare me
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 07:46 PM
Feb 2016

even after they have said they intend to attack America

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
54. Well, tough nuts
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 07:49 PM
Feb 2016

During the SOTU - held in the Capitol - there is one cabinet member who is kept in a secure offsite location, in case anything bad happens.

I don't know where this memorial will be, but if it is not in a facility as secure as the Capitol, then it is unlikely that they want Biden and Obama, along with the entire Supreme Court and a shitload of Senators in the same place at the same time.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
62. And that is the way it is
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 07:57 PM
Feb 2016

but in this case you are justifying keeping the President out due to terrarists. By the way, in this case it would be more than just one cabinet member staying away from the funeral.

This is just terrible optics... imo, and helps none when you have a POTUS speaking about partisanship. Ok. Sir. take the first step and be the adult in the room. End pf discussion.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
14. Bad optics if you want to claim to be above partisanship
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 04:35 PM
Feb 2016

Presidents, no matter personal feeings, must put those to the side.

ProfessorGAC

(65,191 posts)
17. If I Were The Family, I Don't Think I'd Want Him There
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 04:40 PM
Feb 2016

All that extra security, extra news attention, helicopters hovering while trying to hold a funeral mass?

I know Biden's going, but the VP doesn't create quite the stir the POTUS does.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
19. You never been around a veep visit I take it
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 04:45 PM
Feb 2016

Able was above, and the snipers were quite cuddly too

If the family requested it, fine. Have Josh Ernst tell us in no uncertain terms

ProfessorGAC

(65,191 posts)
92. But, I Have Been In The Same Room. . .
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:09 AM
Feb 2016

. . .with Obama, and if that's any indication of what would have to happen at a family funeral, i'd just as soon he send his condolences and stay home.

Not that anybody in my family would warrant a presidential visit to a funeral, but i can see it being extremely disruptive.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
94. As I said, if such a request exists, respect it, and MAKE IT PUBLIC
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 01:14 PM
Feb 2016

this is not about Obama, or Scalia, but the offices. And when you have Potus speak two weeks ago partisanship... this looks well... partisan.

Solomon

(12,319 posts)
37. bad optics only to you
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 06:48 PM
Feb 2016

Obama is doing the right thing. Scalia doesn't deserve any respect from any black person. Neither did Renquist. Despicable racists.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
41. This is not about respect to Scalia
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 07:01 PM
Feb 2016

but respect to the office. I know, this is hardly a point that should be made. But I fear in the current age we are to the point that we are indeed close to a hot civil war. I hope you enjoy it. I know I won't

onenote

(42,767 posts)
23. Scalia did not attend anyone's SOTU addresses for 20 years
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 04:59 PM
Feb 2016

He stopped attending during the Clinton administration and never attended another one.

And he was hardly alone in that regard. Ginsburg has only attended about half (admittedly in some instances health issues prevented her attendance). The great William O Douglas only attended once in his last ten years on the Court. Stevens attended less than 25 percent of the 30 or so SOTU addresses from 1965 until he left the Court. And Byron White attended two out of the last 25 SOTUs during his time on the Court.

Frankly, given what a partisan clap-happy fest the SOTU has become, I think its best that Supreme Court Justices not attend.

Yupster

(14,308 posts)
68. I don't think the Supremes should go to State of the Union Addresses
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 08:02 PM
Feb 2016

They have become completely partisan where one side stands and cheers and the other sits on their hands.

The Supremes should stay far away from that.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
74. I wish we went back to the early 20th century delivery
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 08:08 PM
Feb 2016

yup, sent to Congress in an envelope and that's it.

It could be released to the media at the same time

Yupster

(14,308 posts)
87. I agree
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 12:14 AM
Feb 2016

It's become a partisan pep rally and the Supremes have no reason to be anywhere near a partisan pep rally.

 

Bigmack

(8,020 posts)
21. OK.. go ahead and climb my ass, but...
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 04:52 PM
Feb 2016

... I think he should go. If only to show those motherfuckers that he has more class than them.

Also, it would be a big "Fuck you, Fat Tony, I'm still here and you are taking the Big Dirt Nap".

I've always thought Obama's biggest character flaw was NOT being able to say "Fuck You" to the people who truly deserve it.

WWJD.... What would (Lyndon) Johnson do? That fucker almost got me killed, but he sure knew the value of a good "Fuck You."

onenote

(42,767 posts)
25. I agree with you: Nixon and Earl Warren
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 05:06 PM
Feb 2016

Nixon attended Earl Warren's funeral even though Warren was anathema to conservatives (remember the "impeach Earl Warren" movement)?

If Nixon could attend Warren's funeral, then Obama should attend Scalia's unless he is expressly and publicly asked not to attend by the family.

onenote

(42,767 posts)
43. We may agree, but it's not the President's role to make such distinctions
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 07:08 PM
Feb 2016

A sizable portion of the United States thought Scalia was great. A sizable number thought he wasn't. And a sizable number don't know diddly squat about him. The thing is, while the first group might not support Obama, might hate him, he still is the President of all the people, not just those like him or that he likes.

If Obama is going to pay his respects by going to the wake, then the argument that Scalia doesn't deserve the President's respect falls apart.

As for Scalia being an associate justice, he was the senior member of the Court. And one day after the President gives remarks decrying the level of partisanship in the country is not the time to be skipping an opponent's funeral.

 

Reter

(2,188 posts)
85. He's not good to you because you disagreed with his politics
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 11:24 PM
Feb 2016

Warren wasn't good to right-wingers for the same mirror of a reason. But some look past political differences.

http://bluenationreview.com/justice-scalia-calls-notorious-rbg-almost-always-correct/



Guy Whitey Corngood

(26,505 posts)
28. I don't buy it for a second. This is all a dirty
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 05:15 PM
Feb 2016

trick to get all our bestest patriots in one place. So he can then swoop in with his Black Panthers Lives Matter goons and lock them all up in the Planned Parenthood ACORN camps.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
30. I would assume that it is because of other priorities
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 05:17 PM
Feb 2016

Not to put too fine a point on it, but there are a lot of flaming shitballs in the world right now.

Or they can't get security together in time.

onenote

(42,767 posts)
40. what concerns me is that Press Sec'y Josh Earnest ducked a question about whether Obama
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 06:54 PM
Feb 2016

would be playing golf at the time of the funeral. I hope not. The optics of that would be bad.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
42. He may not know
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 07:07 PM
Feb 2016

But his presence is disruptive to any event, and perhaps the family doesn't want a carnival.

(and by "disruptive", I mean in terms of media focus and security)

onenote

(42,767 posts)
45. I'd be shocked if the Press Secretary didn't have a pretty clear idea of the President's schedule
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 07:13 PM
Feb 2016

three days from now.

And giving a press conference decrying partisanship in DC and then playing golf at the time of the funeral of the senior member of the Court, even one who was your "opponent", sends a very muddled message.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
48. Can we wait for reality to catch up before decrying the golf game
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 07:17 PM
Feb 2016

Biden was on the judiciary committee when Scalia was confirmed.

This is quite a bigger deal for Joe Biden, frankly, who is likely to speak.

It is not ordinary to have the president and vice president both at a public event like this.

onenote

(42,767 posts)
49. Funeral of State Sen. Clementa Pickney. Funeral of Senator Inouye.
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 07:37 PM
Feb 2016

And Obama attended Walter Cronkite's funeral.

Again, he doesn't have to. But as I've said, if you want to be taken seriously when you decry partisanship, you better make it clear that there is good reason for not attending the funeral of an opponent. Otherwise you simply leave yourself open for criticism that you say one thing and do another. It's bad politics, that's all.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
50. Biden was much more important to Scalia's career and memory
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 07:41 PM
Feb 2016

Biden was the ranking minority member of the Senate Judiciary Committee when Scalia was confirmed.

Insofar as which one is more important to the life, memory and career of Scalia, Biden is much more significant.

For security reasons, and given the likely attendance of this thing, you wouldn't want Biden and Obama in the same place.

onenote

(42,767 posts)
83. I don't buy the security point at all.
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 10:49 PM
Feb 2016

The Pickney funeral was held at a sports arena that held 5500 people. The Scalia funeral is being held at a church that holds half that many and that has been used for high profile events attended by the President and/or other dignitaries numerous times and is used to dealing with security. Plus the Pickney funeral was open to the public -first come, first served. The Scalia funeral is invitation only.

And there is no reason that both Obama and Biden can't attend. They both attended Robert Byrd's funeral and undoubtedly Biden was closer to Byrd, having served with him from 1973 to 2010. Obama, who only served with Byrd for around four years, attended as sign of respect for a senior Senator not a close personal friend.

Again the point here is political tone-deafness. The repubs have overreached and have been put on the defensive for being so overtly partisan with respect to the Court. Under the circumstances, the smart political strategy is go above and beyond and attend the funeral. The point is to disarm the opposition. Instead, by skipping the funeral (and leaving the impression he might be golfing instead, whether or not that turns out to be true), Obama has allowed the conversation to change -- something that anyone could foresee happening.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
56. That is my point about optics
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 07:50 PM
Feb 2016

you do not decry partisanship and then duck this funeral. It is not because you respect, or not, the Justice who just passed. It is becuase of the office he represented.

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)
82. Obama would be criticized no matter what the decision. Just look at this conversation.
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 08:32 PM
Feb 2016

I'm sure the RW is a thousand times more critical than any DUr. The poor guy can't do anything without being criticized.

Monk06

(7,675 posts)
32. The haters will hate whether he attended or not Plus Scalia hated Obama's guts and did everything
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 05:25 PM
Feb 2016

to impede his leadership Including speaking out in public against his policies and legislative agenda

Fuck Scalia Let the Freepers morn their fake genious

The news produced a thread with 162 posts on FR

Not bad but not epic

monicaangela

(1,508 posts)
33. Kudos Mr. President!
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 05:45 PM
Feb 2016

Executive ability is deciding quickly and getting somebody else to do the work.

~~~~~~~Earl Nightingale

KatyMan

(4,210 posts)
63. Whachya doin' Saturday Joe?
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 07:57 PM
Feb 2016

I don't know, nothing really.
How about going to Scalia's funeral?
Dang it! well, ok.

 

Reter

(2,188 posts)
84. I wonder what would happen if Obama did that
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 10:56 PM
Feb 2016

What would Republicans do? They couldn't impeach him, since it's not a high crime.

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
77. good decision -- respectful
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 08:20 PM
Feb 2016

Too many not polite folk out there to jeer and yell -- and a few media folk to scream questions.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
91. Obama's put up with a ton of abuse from righties for 7 years. Let him have this.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 03:56 AM
Feb 2016

I don't blame him.

Every time I hear any mention of Scalia's passing, I feel lighthearted and optimistic. He was nasty and hateful.

Orrex

(63,224 posts)
93. Scalia openly disrespected Obama during his SOTU speech
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 08:13 AM
Feb 2016

Why in the world should Obama be expected to honor this vile sack of shit now that he's dead?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»White House Says Obama Wi...