in 1, 2,......

Last edited Wed Feb 17, 2016, 10:06 PM - Edit history (1)

The person writing this article seems to be a Peyton Manning fan boy. Sean King wrote the article about Peyton Manning to show the difference in the way Peyton Manning and Cam Newton have been treated. King's point was that Manning had been given a pass throughout his career and had not been criticized for things for which Newton would have been criticized. King wanted to negate the idea that Peyton Manning was a squeaky clean athlete while Cam Newton was a thug.

I do believe a judge did ruled that there was at least enough evidence to prove that Manning attempted to defame Mrs. Naughright. Are we really to believe that Peyton Manning would not have been able to find one person to support his claim if he was in fact telling the truth? Are we supposed to disregard the letter his former teammate supposedly wrote to him telling him to just tell the truth? Why would the former teammate lie in the letter which he probably never thought would be made public?

are written by fan boys and fan girls. Just because someone doesn't make his living writing doesn't mean he has nothing worth saying.

<a href="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/commercial-photography/california/palm-springs/"><img src="" alt="Palm Springs commercial photography"></a>

Party A wins the superbowl.
Party B days later has a lawsuit from events 20 years ago that makes all the headlines.

I know they settled out of court once. Guess she wants seconds? Isn't there some kind of statute of limitations?

Actually it would be thirds. She has already collected twice - once from Manning and once from the University of Tennessee.

I just ran another search, and there is nothing to indicate that Jamie Naughright had anything to do with this coming out...

http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl-news/4695131-peyton-manning-case-jamie-naughright-lance-armstrong-ryan-braun-betsy-andreu

Dated: 2/16/2016

snip-

Now Betsy Andreu, a stay-at-home mom and University of Michigan graduate, is urging Naughright to come forward about what happened between her and the then-19-year old quarterback in 1996 if she is legally able

-snip

Her career was destroyed. I would have settled out of court too with no other career options available to her. As a woman, I find this post extremely distasteful and disrespectful. By all means, continue to besmirch a woman who has yet to say anything publicly about this.

In a nutshell, it is Saxon's testimony and his email that convinced me on this matter. (and I lost friends for backing Manning in the Saints v. Colts SB because I don't feel NOLA "deserved" a victory any more than any other American city). It's kind of a bummer to see he's a pig. I already knew his father had an ego the size of NYC. Unfortunate story that I happen to believe after reviewing the story.

If she files the suit or whatever else, it will be Naughright. And another point as to your response:

"Now Betsy Andreu, a stay-at-home mom and University of Michigan graduate, is urging Naughright to come forward about what happened between her and the then-19-year old quarterback in 1996 if she is legally able "

So either way, the pronoun stands...

I doubt she wants anything to do with it. Assuming "she" is behind this would make that old cliche true. "She" appears to have no comment on this.

There has been nothing to support a new suit being filed. This is a story. Nothing more. So don't take it out on her.

Whether it was BS or not, I am unsure of. Time will tell. I think I can use the pronoun "she" in my post. If you read it again it was ended with questions regarding whats going on, not accusations. I have no idea why you are taking such an issue with the use of a pronoun, but it is very uninteresting now. Feel free to get in the last word, I wont be replying anymore though

That's it. This is called debating/calling out. You made an incorrect assumption about this woman and this story. I corrected you. The rest of your post is avoidance.

"Feel free to get in the last word, I wont be replying anymore though..."

A jade's trick often used by one unable to support his allegation, but unwilling to admit as much.

How many people want to argue over the use of pronouns this morning? I don't know who this jade was, but getting out of really boring discussions is a nice skill to have. Btw, I made no allegations, read the posts again.

It has to do with "Guess she wants seconds?" "She" has nothing to do with this latest story coming out.

probably not a monster-

But a spoiled frat asshole...

I guess she got paid 300K for nothing right?

Frankly I don't care one way or the other about a prank twenty years ago.

pranks usually don't include head-to-head

Have you ever been in a locker room?

"Frankly I don't care one way or the other about a prank twenty years ago..."

It's often much more convenient to trivialize than to analyze... as our bias often depends on doing so.

of that poster's own/daughter's/mother's/sister's head...

Are you the same person you were twenty years ago? I know I'm not.

then there would be room for forgiveness.

It came to light again because the incident with Manning was recently cited in a Title IX lawsuit brought by 6 women against the University of Tennessee. She is not party to that.

In addition, Peyton Manning broke the nondisclosure agreement by what was written in a biography. Then it was broken again in a documentary. Naughright sued both times. She lost her job when the book came out.
Both incidents were settled. However, affadavits were given in the first suit. Peyton's claims were not supported. That is why a lot of new info is out. Without that book, the affadavits nd such would not have happened.

If he had left it alone after the first incident, it might be written off as one bad decision. However, by trashing her in his book, he went after her again with more lies. The documentary was the third time she had to del with it. NOTE: She did not start these last two fights either. She sued because of Peyton's skeevy actions. I would have sued too.

Peyton was a complete dumbass for letting what he said be printed in that book.

This is a point I was trying to make further upthread where some were speculating on the accuser having something to do with this. (the ghostwriter and Saxon are actually what convinced me)

I'll be glad to see Peyton go.

I like Peyton Manning, but I couldn't care less about the Broncos as a team. The only reason I pulled for them in the Super Bowl was so Peyton could ride off into the sunset with another ring.

I barely watch the NFL, and I had no idea that Denver had such a kick-ass defense. No wonder Cam Newton acted like a little kid after the game. He'd gotten his ass handed to him for four straight quarters.

a fan of either team. Loss hurts. I'm sure he'll do better next time.