Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Stand up. Miss Lee's passing."
It takes a writer like Charles Pierce to commemorate a great writer:
Harper Lee Taught Us the Truth About the America in Which We Were Being Raised
Harper Lee, who died on Friday at 89, taught so many of us how first to read a book without pictures. (Whenever I am reminded that To Kill A Mockingbird is somehow as equally revered as that unlikable mess, Catcher In The Rye, I despair of American youth.) She taught us what simple humanity was before we were old enough to put a name to it. She taught usgently, as was the fashion of the timesthat there was something very wrong at the heart of the America in which we were being raised. I know it's fashionable now to deride Lee's masterpiece as a tepid depiction of the segregated South in which she was raised. (And let us be charitable and forget the unseemly circus surrounding Go Tell The Watchman.) But, when I consider these arguments, I am reminded always of what Frederick Douglass said in the aftermath of the murder of Abraham Lincoln:
It was 1960 when Lee published her book. Goodman, Schwerner, and Chaney were still alive. So were Viola Liuzzo and Medgar Evers, and Martin Luther King, Jr.
Addie Mae Collins and Denise McNair and Carole Robertson and Cynthia Wesley were still going happily to Sunday school at the Sixteenth Street Baptist Church in Birmingham. I like to believe that, even if we didn't know it at the time, even if it were only subconsciously, Lee's book gave millions of schoolchildren something to stash away in ourselves to make sense of what was coming to the country and to determine for ourselves on which side justice was arrayed. I believe, given the sentiment of its times, To Kill A Mockingbird became genuinely subversive over the following decade.
And, anyway, it was beautifully written, which counts, too. Stand up. Miss Lee's passing.
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a42309/harper-lee-passing/
Harper Lee, who died on Friday at 89, taught so many of us how first to read a book without pictures. (Whenever I am reminded that To Kill A Mockingbird is somehow as equally revered as that unlikable mess, Catcher In The Rye, I despair of American youth.) She taught us what simple humanity was before we were old enough to put a name to it. She taught usgently, as was the fashion of the timesthat there was something very wrong at the heart of the America in which we were being raised. I know it's fashionable now to deride Lee's masterpiece as a tepid depiction of the segregated South in which she was raised. (And let us be charitable and forget the unseemly circus surrounding Go Tell The Watchman.) But, when I consider these arguments, I am reminded always of what Frederick Douglass said in the aftermath of the murder of Abraham Lincoln:
Viewed from the genuine abolition ground, Mr. Lincoln seemed tardy, cold, dull, and indifferent; but measuring him by the sentiment of his country, a sentiment he was bound as a statesman to consult, he was swift, zealous, radical, and determined.
It was 1960 when Lee published her book. Goodman, Schwerner, and Chaney were still alive. So were Viola Liuzzo and Medgar Evers, and Martin Luther King, Jr.
Addie Mae Collins and Denise McNair and Carole Robertson and Cynthia Wesley were still going happily to Sunday school at the Sixteenth Street Baptist Church in Birmingham. I like to believe that, even if we didn't know it at the time, even if it were only subconsciously, Lee's book gave millions of schoolchildren something to stash away in ourselves to make sense of what was coming to the country and to determine for ourselves on which side justice was arrayed. I believe, given the sentiment of its times, To Kill A Mockingbird became genuinely subversive over the following decade.
And, anyway, it was beautifully written, which counts, too. Stand up. Miss Lee's passing.
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a42309/harper-lee-passing/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 1321 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (36)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Stand up. Miss Lee's passing." (Original Post)
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2016
OP
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,678 posts)1. ...
lastlib
(23,266 posts)2. .
.
. . .
raging moderate
(4,308 posts)3. That's "Go Set a Watchman."
This title was taken from the Old Testament book of Isaiah, chapter 21, verse 6: "Go, set a watchman, let him declare what he sees."
mcar
(42,366 posts)4. Something in my eye
2naSalit
(86,748 posts)5. *SIGH*
longship
(40,416 posts)6. Hey Boo!
A scene that always tears me up.
And yup! Robert Duvall's first big movie part.
Both the book and the film are something wonderful.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)11. Horton Foote wrote that
Credit where credit is due.
burrowowl
(17,644 posts)7. RIP!
I have read her book at least 5 times!
anamnua
(1,118 posts)8. Good posting albeit
that I disagree about 'Catcher in the Rye'.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)9. ...
oberliner
(58,724 posts)10. Catcher in the Rye is an unlikable mess?
What a jackass thing to say.
KG
(28,752 posts)12. Stand up. Mr Pierce is passing.