General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCops asking Ancestry.Com for customers DNA
http://fusion.net/story/215204/law-enforcement-agencies-are-asking-ancestry-com-and-23andme-for-their-customers-dna/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=socialshare&utm_content=theme_top"Now, five years later, when 23andMe and Ancestry both have over a million customers, those warnings are looking prescient. Your relatives DNA could turn you into a suspect, warns Wired, writing about a case from earlier this year, in which New Orleans filmmaker Michael Usry became a suspect in an unsolved murder case after cops did a familial genetic search using semen collected in 1996. The cops searched an Ancestry.com database and got a familial match to a saliva sample Usrys father had given years earlier. Usry was ultimately determined to be innocent and the Electronic Frontier Foundation called it a wild goose chase that demonstrated the very real threats to privacy and civil liberties posed by law enforcement access to private genetic databases.
JonathanRackham
(1,604 posts)Nothing to worry about if you're innocent.
What next, mandatory DNA database submission?
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)K and R
packman
(16,296 posts)Why-why back (60's or so) , if you filled out a card at your local B&R's ice cream store with you child's birthday on it, the kiddies got a free ice-cream cone on that special day. Family fun - right? You and the kids eating your cones in the glow of something special. Well, not so special. The U.S. government got ahold of these cards, formed a database and made sure when the kid became draft eligible , they were called up.
Program stopped when the shit hit the fan. They still have the birthday cards, but cut their strings to the Selective Service. Yes, I know there are probably a dozen or maybe a hundred ways to make sure Johnny got his gun and got called up to serve as cannon fodder, but B&R's didn't need to help.
MagickMuffin
(15,943 posts)It was only a matter of time.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)The goal of wholesale surveillance, as Arendt wrote in The Origins of Totalitarianism, is not, in the end, to discover crimes, but to be on hand when the government decides to arrest a certain category of the population. And because Americans emails, phone conversations, Web searches and geographical movements are recorded and stored in perpetuity in government databases, there will be more than enough evidence to seize us should the state deem it necessary. This information waits like a deadly virus inside government vaults to be turned against us. It does not matter how trivial or innocent that information is. In totalitarian states, justice, like truth, is irrelevant.
-- Chris Hedges, SOURCE: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_last_gasp_of_american_democracy_20140105