Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mfcorey1

(11,001 posts)
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:56 PM Feb 2016

Burlingame woman, 97, evicted after 66 years

The year Marie Hatch moved into the wood-shingled cottage in tony Burlingame that she calls home, Harry Truman was president and "€œGoodnight Irene" was a radio hit. Her landlord and friend, Vivian Kruse, told her she could live in the cottage until she died.

Fast-forward 66 years. Kruse is dead, her daughter is dead, and her granddaughter is dead. They each passed down the lifetime guarantee of tenancy for Hatch --€” but when the final woman died, so did the verbal agreement, the current landlord says.

That'€™s why he is evicting Hatch, who is now 97, fighting cancer and long both single and retired from her bakery job. She says she will probably wind up in the street if she has to leave.

On Feb. 11, she was served with a 60-day notice to vacate the house or be tossed out by sheriff'€™s deputies. Tenant advocates say her plight is emblematic of a growing eviction and rent-hike horror overtaking non-homeowners in San Mateo County.

"They'€™re trying to take away everything from me here," Hatch said as she sat in her tidy living room, where fading photos of family gaze down on her collections of tiny ceramic bunnies and kitties. "Gee whiz, I don't know what I'€™ll do if I have to leave.

"€œI have a lot of tears, a lot of happiness, a lot of memories in this house. It is my home. Where can I go?"

Her misery has very close company --€” her sublet roommate and friend of 32 years, Georgia Rothrock. At 85, Rothrock also has few options. Between the two of them, they pay about $900 monthly rent, which chews up much of their Social Security checks.

Neither of the women can afford a new, more expensive place to live or have relatives they can move in with.

Landlord David Kantz tells his own version of the turn of events. He says he feels terrible that he is evicting Hatch, but the trust left behind by his wife --€” the third of the previous landlord women who are now deceased --€” expires in July, and he is duty-bound to sell the property on behalf of his two sons.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/burlingame-woman-97-evicted-after-66-years/ar-BBpMMzO?form=PRHPTP&ocid=mailsignout

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Burlingame woman, 97, evicted after 66 years (Original Post) mfcorey1 Feb 2016 OP
Find the landlord StandingInLeftField Feb 2016 #1
If it's for his 2 sons, then surely they can afford to treat their mother's wishes with respect. blm Feb 2016 #2
If he wanted to be compassionate, he could sell it with a clause that the current occupant remain mfcorey1 Feb 2016 #6
That's what's happening with the Playboy Mansion KamaAina Feb 2016 #9
Landlord says he's "duty bound" joeybee12 Feb 2016 #3
Yeah, I didn't understand that part. HughBeaumont Feb 2016 #4
That's what I think, too...nt joeybee12 Feb 2016 #5
One of the comments PasadenaTrudy Feb 2016 #7
they cannot afford a new place? hfojvt Feb 2016 #8
Lawrence, KS is a much different place than MineralMan Feb 2016 #10
This being the Bay Area in 2016, they have a GoFundMe page KamaAina Feb 2016 #11

blm

(113,065 posts)
2. If it's for his 2 sons, then surely they can afford to treat their mother's wishes with respect.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:02 PM
Feb 2016

Pulling this rug now should be considered antithetical to everything their mother and her family stood for in their lives.

mfcorey1

(11,001 posts)
6. If he wanted to be compassionate, he could sell it with a clause that the current occupant remain
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:19 PM
Feb 2016

for the rest of her life. I am sure that a good legal team could draw up the document. Then he can go ahead and greedily access the funds for his 'desperate' sons.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
9. That's what's happening with the Playboy Mansion
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 02:07 PM
Feb 2016

It's up for sale, but 85-year-old Hef gets to stay for the duration.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
3. Landlord says he's "duty bound"
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:08 PM
Feb 2016

Is that his weasel way of making people think he's legally obligated but really isn't?

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
4. Yeah, I didn't understand that part.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:12 PM
Feb 2016

There's no higher power here commanding he toss this poor woman in the streets. This is selfish best interests at work, masked by this flimsy and likely untrue reasoning.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
8. they cannot afford a new place?
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:52 PM
Feb 2016

I would consider moving to a place where rent is far, far less than $900 a month. I find two bedroom apartments in Lawrence, Kansas (a college town even) for less than $500 a month.

Unfortunately, your home is not "yours" if you are a renter. Sheesh, if she had bought a place 40 years ago, she'd be rich right now.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
10. Lawrence, KS is a much different place than
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 02:11 PM
Feb 2016

Burlingame, CA. I've been to both places. Lawrence isn't a good choice for a couple of very old women, really. Really, there aren't a lot of options for you at that age. It's not just the rent cost.

And yes, she probably could have bought a home 40 years ago. However, that is not the situation she is in. Have you no compassion for two elderly women who are being evicted from a place they've lived for decades? How sad...or so it seems to me.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Burlingame woman, 97, evi...