Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:11 PM Feb 2016

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas hasn’t asked a question in a decade

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/supreme-court-justice-clarence-thomas-hasnt-asked-question-decade?cid=sm_fb_msnbc

Ten years ago Monday, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas asked a question from the bench.

He hasn’t done it since.

The streak is a record — no other justice in modern history has gone more than a term without asking a question during oral arguments. It’s also a source of curiosity and angst in the legal community.

It will also likely continue for some time. Thomas has shown no sign of changing his ways, issuing his opinions in written form and making little more than small talk with other justices when the court is hearing arguments — and, once, three years ago, cracking an apparent joke.
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
1. Why waste your time in discussion when your mind is already made up?
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:21 PM
Feb 2016
Beware: Clarence Thomas Is One Of America’s Top Legal Minds

Thomas’s mere presence on the Court, combined with his efforts to grant legitimacy to long discarded doctrines, gives credibility to this narrow vision of the Constitution that it could otherwise never enjoy. Before the Tea Party even existed, before Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) claimed that the “hard part about believing in freedom” is allowing whites-only lunch counters to exist — and before three of Thomas’s colleagues joined him in trying to judicially repeal the Affordable Care Act based on a legal argument that, in one Reagan-appointed judge’s words, had no basis “in either the text of the Constitution or Supreme Court precedent” — Thomas sat silently on the Supreme Court’s bench, pondering how to transform the Tea Party’s wildest dreams into reality.
Clarence Thomas is not a lightweight. He is one of the more intelligent members of the Supreme Court. And he is one of the most dangerous men in America. Progressives dismiss his intellect at their peril.

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/02/24/3321531/clarence-thomas-americas-legal-minds-progressives-ignore-fact-peril/

question everything

(47,486 posts)
6. Or, was made up to you by an esteemed jurist?
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:27 PM
Feb 2016

Now that Scalia no longer is there to guide him, whom should he follow?

Bucky

(54,026 posts)
7. He's smart, no doubt, but he's in an intellectual bubble
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:29 PM
Feb 2016

The fact that he's unwilling to engage Kagan, Ginsberg, Sotomayor, Kennedy, and the appeals presenters in vigorous debate & questioning tells us he's more than just an introvert. He's a political operative twisting the law to a narrow ideology. I don't care if he can spin frivolous arguments into refined legal language or kill it at Sudoku, his intelligence is wasted in his unwillingness to engage. He's a benchwarmer. The fact that he's smart only makes the tragedy of his appointment all the greater. Scalia was a knuckledragger, but at least he made his pro-rule-of-law opponents on the bench hone their arguments.

greymattermom

(5,754 posts)
2. That must be so boring
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:21 PM
Feb 2016

In long meetings, I ask questions to keep from falling asleep. How does he do it? Who writes the opinions, anyway?

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
3. The most useless seat waster
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:21 PM
Feb 2016

ever to take position on the SC. He's a pathetic example of conservative values.

Bucky

(54,026 posts)
4. Maybe he's quietly contemplating the issues, taking it all in, analyzing, stacking the Tetris blocks
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:24 PM
Feb 2016

Nah, he seems more like an Angry Birds kind of guy to me.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
8. He apparently knows his Lincoln:
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:38 PM
Feb 2016

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.

~~Abraham Lincoln

vinny9698

(1,016 posts)
14. Thomas just followed Scalia's lead.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:45 PM
Feb 2016

They both attended Koch annual functions. Thomas's wife was paid a handsome amount of money to promote the Tea Party and is still involved in RW organizations. Her income wasn't reported until an investigative reporter made it public. Then Thomas played dumb and amended his tax returns and SC paper work. Any one else would have charged with tax evasion.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court Justice Cla...