General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSupreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas hasn’t asked a question in a decade
Ten years ago Monday, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas asked a question from the bench.
He hasnt done it since.
The streak is a record no other justice in modern history has gone more than a term without asking a question during oral arguments. Its also a source of curiosity and angst in the legal community.
It will also likely continue for some time. Thomas has shown no sign of changing his ways, issuing his opinions in written form and making little more than small talk with other justices when the court is hearing arguments and, once, three years ago, cracking an apparent joke.
Human101948
(3,457 posts)Thomass mere presence on the Court, combined with his efforts to grant legitimacy to long discarded doctrines, gives credibility to this narrow vision of the Constitution that it could otherwise never enjoy. Before the Tea Party even existed, before Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) claimed that the hard part about believing in freedom is allowing whites-only lunch counters to exist and before three of Thomass colleagues joined him in trying to judicially repeal the Affordable Care Act based on a legal argument that, in one Reagan-appointed judges words, had no basis in either the text of the Constitution or Supreme Court precedent Thomas sat silently on the Supreme Courts bench, pondering how to transform the Tea Partys wildest dreams into reality.
Clarence Thomas is not a lightweight. He is one of the more intelligent members of the Supreme Court. And he is one of the most dangerous men in America. Progressives dismiss his intellect at their peril.
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/02/24/3321531/clarence-thomas-americas-legal-minds-progressives-ignore-fact-peril/
question everything
(47,486 posts)Now that Scalia no longer is there to guide him, whom should he follow?
Bucky
(54,026 posts)The fact that he's unwilling to engage Kagan, Ginsberg, Sotomayor, Kennedy, and the appeals presenters in vigorous debate & questioning tells us he's more than just an introvert. He's a political operative twisting the law to a narrow ideology. I don't care if he can spin frivolous arguments into refined legal language or kill it at Sudoku, his intelligence is wasted in his unwillingness to engage. He's a benchwarmer. The fact that he's smart only makes the tragedy of his appointment all the greater. Scalia was a knuckledragger, but at least he made his pro-rule-of-law opponents on the bench hone their arguments.
greymattermom
(5,754 posts)In long meetings, I ask questions to keep from falling asleep. How does he do it? Who writes the opinions, anyway?
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)ever to take position on the SC. He's a pathetic example of conservative values.
Bucky
(54,026 posts)Nah, he seems more like an Angry Birds kind of guy to me.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)if he even notices............
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.
~~Abraham Lincoln
Javaman
(62,530 posts)Demonaut
(8,918 posts)Takket
(21,577 posts)joeybee12
(56,177 posts)He's in over his head...always has been/
SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)That's seven years in most places.
vinny9698
(1,016 posts)They both attended Koch annual functions. Thomas's wife was paid a handsome amount of money to promote the Tea Party and is still involved in RW organizations. Her income wasn't reported until an investigative reporter made it public. Then Thomas played dumb and amended his tax returns and SC paper work. Any one else would have charged with tax evasion.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)That is, how he is supposed to vote: CAVEMAN.