Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRadical Group Seizes Federal Building, Refuses to Comply with Constitution.
[center]
.... from the desk of Matt @Wuerker:
http://politi.co/1PRxCaT
LayCee Cox ?@cox_laycee
@politico @wuerker I love it!!!!! You should have put pics of all GOP 2016 contenders inside walls too!!!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1129 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (21)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Radical Group Seizes Federal Building, Refuses to Comply with Constitution. (Original Post)
L. Coyote
Feb 2016
OP
mgmaggiemg
(869 posts)1. omg so funny ;)
thanks
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)2. After today's news, this needs a kick.
burrowowl
(17,641 posts)3. K&R!!!!!!
jmowreader
(50,560 posts)4. Fuck you, Mitch...
We pay you worthless cocksuckers $173,000 a year and haven't gotten a lick 'a' work out of any of you yet. Buy your own fucking snacks.
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)5. They are working their asses off day and night
fighting their religious war instead of doing their Constitutional duty!
Their insane political judgement makes perfect sense when their actions are seen as religiously governed rather than part of the office holder's duty under oath to a political organization in a democracy.
Succinctly, elections have consequences.