Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Do we really want to see a Republican Convention that is brokered and ends with (Original Post) imanamerican63 Feb 2016 OP
their campaign sure went into the toilet fast this time... CTyankee Feb 2016 #1
If you are a Democrat, then you'd want to see a convention that ends as acrimonously as possible PoliticAverse Feb 2016 #2
This is shaking out like 1980 so I say it will be Trump/Rubio on the GOP ticket. nt TeamPooka Feb 2016 #3
Hell yes I want a GOP brokered convention and Trump running as an indie. leftofcool Feb 2016 #4
That's my dream meow2u3 Feb 2016 #19
Etch-a-sketch man...and I don't mean Mittens. CincyDem Feb 2016 #5
Wes Clark? Ilsa Feb 2016 #23
Really? CincyDem Feb 2016 #24
Clark was talked about as a Democratic candidate that year. mikehiggins Feb 2016 #30
I don't know what you mean by "messing around in Ilsa Feb 2016 #34
Just once... Jester Messiah Feb 2016 #6
For me Bernie is a real choice. malokvale77 Feb 2016 #10
That is the thing the paymasters fear most. Volaris Feb 2016 #25
Obviously we DU'ers want to see an outcome with Democrats elected, but... Jerry442 Feb 2016 #7
And heres Willard!!! Wellstone ruled Feb 2016 #8
My money is still on Kasich at a brokered convention NV Whino Feb 2016 #9
TPTB want JEB! and HRC as the candidates. malokvale77 Feb 2016 #11
In the coin toss I'd have odds on Hillary. nt TBF Feb 2016 #15
Ha ha. nt malokvale77 Feb 2016 #18
Well on a more serious note folks have suggested they may TBF Feb 2016 #20
Oh dear, the oligarchs have deemed us screwed. nt malokvale77 Feb 2016 #22
What would they seriously expect as a result IDemo Feb 2016 #14
That makes sense, IDemo. I'm one of those who Hortensis Feb 2016 #33
Yes, because it would cause an all-out civil war in the party. phantom power Feb 2016 #12
This ^^^ Wounded Bear Feb 2016 #13
Brokered convention means no one won enough primaries to take the nomination jmowreader Feb 2016 #17
As someone who lives in TN I can say white_wolf Feb 2016 #27
Haslam's advantage is no one outside TN knows who he is jmowreader Feb 2016 #32
i want the people's will to be respected on both sides. restorefreedom Feb 2016 #16
Imagine it: Trump has a big lead going into Cleveland...then gets screwed there... First Speaker Feb 2016 #21
As long as the fistfights are televised, I'll be happy with whatever those jerks do Warpy Feb 2016 #26
Yes, we do ProudToBeBlueInRhody Feb 2016 #28
There is going to be a moron on their ticket, no matter what Warpy Feb 2016 #29
Kasich/Rubio even. nt greyl Feb 2016 #31

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
2. If you are a Democrat, then you'd want to see a convention that ends as acrimonously as possible
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:41 PM
Feb 2016

for the Republicans, leaving them with as weak a candidate as possible.

meow2u3

(24,764 posts)
19. That's my dream
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:56 PM
Feb 2016

To see some weakling repuke nominated and Trump as an indie. Democrat walks in the White House and repunks lose the Senate.

CincyDem

(6,363 posts)
5. Etch-a-sketch man...and I don't mean Mittens.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:46 PM
Feb 2016

I agree with you.

Think about it. By the convention we will have had 10-12 months of watching the clown car hobble down the road, losing tires and whatever. Then in Cleveland, we get John Doe...and he (cuz I'm assuming the Repubs would NOT nominate a woman through normals business let alone the controversy of a brokered convention), he will have NO track record.

Sure, maybe some voting records and a lot of opinions but he'll have nothing from the primaries that he'll need to defend.

For the republicans...who could it be...no idea but I look to the military. These guys are, for the most part, squeaky clean and getting into a pissing contest with them is easily positioned as anti-vet or anti-American (cuz you know we ARE our military).

McCrystal comes to mind. And he's a favorite of the right because he got hammered for bad mouthing Obama.

Wes Clark - I know he had his shot at the brass ring but the times they are a changing and he might have been rehabilitated when the options are The Donald or TedMan.

Anyway - who the hell knows but you're absolutely right, better a moron we know than a moron we don't.

CincyDem

(6,363 posts)
24. Really?
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 01:25 AM
Feb 2016

He feels like a Jim Webb Democrat. Why do I have this memory of him messing around in the republican primaries ?

I don't doubt you but I have always thought of him as a republican. Wonder why I missed that. thanks.

mikehiggins

(5,614 posts)
30. Clark was talked about as a Democratic candidate that year.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 03:58 AM
Feb 2016

I liked him because of his record and because he could talk about Outkast.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
34. I don't know what you mean by "messing around in
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 06:03 AM
Feb 2016

Republican primaries". He was a candidate in 2004 for the Democratic nomination. He has a long list of Democratic candidate endorsements, including Hilary Clinton and Obama. He was also a Rhodes scholar (Economics, Philosophy, etc) as well as West Point graduate (at or near top of his class).

He has been fairly liberal on social and economic issues, including gay rights (and military service), pro-choice, healthcare for the uninsured (was not at the point of universal in 2004), environment and global warming, etc. He was critical of the Iraq War and the Bush tax cuts. He was not a good politician, though, and never mastered the consequences of soundbites, being taken out of context, etc. Yes, he had some conservative positions, too. I don't know that I'd compare him to Jim Webb.

malokvale77

(4,879 posts)
10. For me Bernie is a real choice.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 09:37 PM
Feb 2016

If it's Hillary vs whatever the GOP comes up with, it will be a toss up between "oh dear gods noes!".

Volaris

(10,272 posts)
25. That is the thing the paymasters fear most.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 01:50 AM
Feb 2016

If the Base over there were to finally be able to get a really-real CONservative on the ticket (like Cruz, where NO ONE could ever claim he wasn't conservative ENOUGH), and that nominee had to stand on stage with a real FDR Liberal like SenSanders, that nominee would get their ass kicked so fucking hard it would destroy the GOP as a national party--and they would finally know beyond doubt that 20% is NOT a majority. They would spend the next quarter century awash in their own tears. The paymasters need 'more balanced' outcomes than that, in order to maintain the illusion that Sensible Woodchucks are the best outcome.

I say LET them nominate the most batshit insane, narcissistic, self-absorbed knownothing asshole they can find. LET them be dumb enough to put that person on stage opposite a Bernie Sanders or an Elizabeth Warren or (much as I might personally prefer otherwise, but I will give credit where it's been earned) a Hillary Clinton. Lets SERIOUSLY HAVE THAT DEBATE ABOUT WHAT THIS NATION VALUES. Because if they want to be dumb enough to pour gasoline on themselves, fuck em light that shit on fire and burn their conservative house DOWN TO THE BEDROCK.

Jerry442

(1,265 posts)
7. Obviously we DU'ers want to see an outcome with Democrats elected, but...
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:49 PM
Feb 2016

...it's a tragedy that one of the two major political parties in this country will almost certainly nominate candidates that have abandoned the concept of actually governing.

NV Whino

(20,886 posts)
9. My money is still on Kasich at a brokered convention
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 09:25 PM
Feb 2016

I think that is why he is still hanging in there. But, I wouldn't rule out JEB¡ either. TPTB really want JEB¡ Romney had such a poor showing last time out, I don't think anyone would suggest him seriously.

malokvale77

(4,879 posts)
11. TPTB want JEB! and HRC as the candidates.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 09:53 PM
Feb 2016

A real snoozefest.

Lowest turnout in history. Winner in a coin toss.

TBF

(32,064 posts)
20. Well on a more serious note folks have suggested they may
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 11:34 PM
Feb 2016

wish to push in Paul Ryan. I could see that happening. Or bringing back Mittens. Rubio can be VP for any of them.

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
14. What would they seriously expect as a result
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:25 PM
Feb 2016

of pushing a Jeb or anyone else in the cellar onto the ticket ahead of candidates with millions more votes and higher popularity? They couldn't possibly piss off voters any more if they tried, and despite the popular opinion that repub elites would do so anyway, there is no reason to believe they will.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
33. That makes sense, IDemo. I'm one of those who
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 05:21 AM
Feb 2016

has said they might push someone who'd been rejected, like Bush or Kaisich, expecting the pubs would fall in line to do battle behind him against us. Large numbers are loyal team players and also have an authoritarian streak, including the "fed-ups," and I still think they probably would do as told. The question is how many would come out in November.

Rubio, if he were second or third placed, is my main guess for someone to replace Trump.

Otherwise, a "new" person would have to be a big name, of course, no time to develop a brand. Paul Ryan does have the name and charisma -- and the extremism that does make him very popular with many big funders, including the Kochs, who backed him in 2012. Rubio would be their man too, though.

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
12. Yes, because it would cause an all-out civil war in the party.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 09:59 PM
Feb 2016

Even if Trump didn't go 3rd-party, the voters would be utterly alienated. It would be a GOP turn-out disaster.

Wounded Bear

(58,664 posts)
13. This ^^^
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:02 PM
Feb 2016

If they go brokered, and pick a guy other than the one who won the primaries, the base will be angry.

jmowreader

(50,559 posts)
17. Brokered convention means no one won enough primaries to take the nomination
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:41 PM
Feb 2016

If they have to go to a brokered convention they are free to choose ANY Republican, regardless of whether he'd been in the primaries. I think they'll choose someone who hasn't been in the 2016 clown car, and who isn't all that well-known, and who is definitely NOT Sarah Palin.

Since being governor has long been a stepping stone to being a Republican president, I looked at the Republican Governor's Association website and picked Bill Haslam, Governor of Tennessee. It could be just about any of them, or at least the ones who haven't tried running for president yet.

white_wolf

(6,238 posts)
27. As someone who lives in TN I can say
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 02:21 AM
Feb 2016

Haslam is fucking terrible. He refused to take money to expand Medicaid[thanks for the lack of healthcare, asshole], is currently pushing to replace workers at the university system with outsourced labor who will have to work for shitty pay and no benefits. Seriously, Haslam is about as vile as they come.

jmowreader

(50,559 posts)
32. Haslam's advantage is no one outside TN knows who he is
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 04:37 AM
Feb 2016

I know he is vile. His family ain't that great either. But right now, who else do they have? They'll want a governor because their opponent is going to be either a former Cabinet official or a sitting Senator, so they want to counter that with state-level executive experience. (We didn't take Palin's stint as a mayor seriously, and the GOP will show Bernie's stint as a mayor the same courtesy.) A LOT of GOP governors ran for president this time around, and the non-runners who are known, are known as scumbags. (Rick Scott, anyone?) So who do they have left? Haslam.

It might be REAL entertaining to pin his family's attempt to rip off every trucking company in America on Bill and watch him squirm.

http://www.newsnet5.com/news/local-news/investigations/jimmy-haslams-849-million-pilot-flying-j-settlement-deal-awaits-approval-monday-in-federal-court

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
16. i want the people's will to be respected on both sides.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:37 PM
Feb 2016

not for party insiders to condescendingly and greedily decide they are going to protect their cronies and monied interests by picking an appropriate puppet.

plus, bernie will pound the living snot out of trump in a ge

First Speaker

(4,858 posts)
21. Imagine it: Trump has a big lead going into Cleveland...then gets screwed there...
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 11:54 PM
Feb 2016

...they appoint someone like Ryan or Romney to be the nominee, despite Il Douche's big lead. Trump goes batshit crazy, tries to go Third party--but is unable to get onto the ballot in most states because of jerryrigged rules designed to prevent just such a thing happening. The Donald goes ballistic, sues everybody in sight, and a large proportion of the GOP electorate--and even some of the Dems--thinks he's been screwed. God knows what happens then. In the immortal words of John Dean: what a delightful prospect!

Warpy

(111,270 posts)
26. As long as the fistfights are televised, I'll be happy with whatever those jerks do
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 01:56 AM
Feb 2016

No matter who runs for which party this year, turnout is likely to be low. I just hope theirs is much lower.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
28. Yes, we do
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 02:47 AM
Feb 2016

Whomever comes out drawing the short straw in a brokered convention, it is bound to alienate 25 to 30 percent of the GOP base at minimum. And for years to come.

We win.

Warpy

(111,270 posts)
29. There is going to be a moron on their ticket, no matter what
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 03:29 AM
Feb 2016

The PTB just want to make sure it's a moron who can be counted on to take orders. That eliminates Trump and Cruz.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do we really want to see ...