Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

littlewolf

(3,813 posts)
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:27 PM Feb 2016

can someone explain this to me. does they say what I think it does.

that someone in CA has decided that Aloe causes cancer?

http://www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/CRNR_notices/admin_listing/intent_to_list/NOIL042315AloeGoldenseal.html

Proposition 65

NOTICE OF INTENT TO LIST CHEMICALS BY THE LABOR CODE MECHANISM: ALOE VERA, WHOLE LEAF EXTRACT AND GOLDENSEAL ROOT POWDER
[04/23/15]
Comment Period Extended [05/20/15]

Comments Available [06/17/15]

Response to Comments Available [12/04/15]

The California Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) intends to list Aloe vera, whole leave extract and Goldenseal root powder as known to the state to cause cancer under the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Proposition 651). This action is being proposed pursuant to the “Labor Code” listing mechanism2. OEHHA has determined that these chemicals meet the criteria for listing by this mechanism.

Chemical

CAS No.

Endpoint

References

Aloe vera, whole leaf extracta

---

Cancer

IARC (2015);
Grosse et al. (2013)


more at the link….

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
can someone explain this to me. does they say what I think it does. (Original Post) littlewolf Feb 2016 OP
I wouldn't worry about the aloe, especially Warpy Feb 2016 #1
One of the constituent chemicals is a "known carcinogen". Note for aloe it's... PoliticAverse Feb 2016 #2
Californians pay about as much attention to Prop 65 warnings KamaAina Feb 2016 #3
Listing does not apply to the type of Aloe vera used in consumer products. OEHHA Feb 2016 #4

Warpy

(111,273 posts)
1. I wouldn't worry about the aloe, especially
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:56 PM
Feb 2016

since what's being targeted is the concentrated extract, not the plant or its juice.

Nor would I worry about the golden seal except the dried and powdered root, again a concentrate.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
2. One of the constituent chemicals is a "known carcinogen". Note for aloe it's...
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:57 PM
Feb 2016

in the extract of the whole leaf.

The California law is very strict.




 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
3. Californians pay about as much attention to Prop 65 warnings
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 06:00 PM
Feb 2016

as smokers do to the Surgeon General's warning. By Prop 65's standards, practically everything causes cancer, so the warnings are everywhere. Kind of like the boy who cried wolf.

OEHHA

(1 post)
4. Listing does not apply to the type of Aloe vera used in consumer products.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 02:35 PM
Feb 2016

The Proposition 65 listing is limited to Aloe vera, non-decolorized whole leaf extract. This is an unprocessed form of Aloe vera that is not typically used in consumer products. The processed form of Aloe vera typically used in consumer products is not covered by the listing. This means those products would not require a Proposition 65 warning and would not be subject to public or private enforcement actions. The listing is based on an identification by the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and required by California law and regulations. Regarding Proposition 65 warnings, we have proposed changes to the warning system. If approved, future warnings would name the specific chemical that prompted the warning and would refer consumers to a new website for additional information on the health effects of the chemical and ways to reduce or eliminate exposure to it.

-- California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»can someone explain this ...