Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBacked by Airline Dollars, Congress Rejects Effort to Address Shrinking Legroom
(The Intercept) An amendment to address shrinking legroom for airline passengers was defeated recently by members of Congress fueled by campaign dollars from the airline industry.
An amendment proposed by Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., would have required the federal government to study the issue of shrinking legroom and allowed it to set a minimum dimension for commercial airline seats.
During the debate over the amendment in a House Transportation Committee hearing, members backed by the industry laughed the idea off.
I see we have some different size seats here in the House, joked Rep. Rodney Davis, R-Ill. Mr. Chairman has a larger seat, do you think the House Administration Committee should study seat sizes here?
Cohen was not amused. Were not in airplanes that are crashing and having 180 people trying to get off at one time to get to a ramp to save their life, Cohen replied. This is not about seats here, Mr. Davis. This is not a funny issue. ..............(more)
https://theintercept.com/2016/02/21/backed-by-airline-dollars-congress-rejects-effort-to-address-shrinking-legroom/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 870 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Backed by Airline Dollars, Congress Rejects Effort to Address Shrinking Legroom (Original Post)
marmar
Feb 2016
OP
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)1. corrupt to the core. Fuck all of us.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)2. wait wait wait
I'd heard that corporations just give politicians money for a laugh.
Can you show me ACTUAL DOCUMENTS - preferably notarized - wherein politicians agree to specifically do something for the money they get?
No?
Then this is all just lies... right-wing smears even...
Hillary 2016
ohnoyoudidnt
(1,858 posts)6. lol nt
MisterP
(23,730 posts)3. expect another round of "flyers never had it so good!"
Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)4. This isn't going to change until people are burned alive
The matter of "too fat to fly" also probably won't be settled till then either.
geomon666
(7,512 posts)5. Congress would reject breathing too.
If a Dem condoned it.