General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMoJo: The GOP Has a Mad Max Problem
Donald Trump, Marco Rubio, and Ted Cruz are hurtling toward a chaotic crash as their three-lane road narrows to one.For the politerati, the 2016 presidential campaign's No. 1 metaphorand it has already become a clichéis the highway lane. ... There's been talk of a tea party lane, an Establishment lane, a social conservative lane, a populist lane, and so on. Now that the first three contests of the season have occurred, it's becoming clear that there are, at most, three lanes, and, in what might be bad news for Republicans, those lanes might not merge anytime soon. In fact, there may be concrete barriers between each of them, and that increases the odds of a big, chaotic crash at the point where these lanes must converge.
Here's the quick-and-easy breakdown. There is a social conservative lane, a road for the candidate fancied by the evangelical voters, the part of the GOP base that used to be called the religious right. Sen. Ted Cruz has the wheel here. Ben Carson once had a shot at this crowd and still draws some support from these quarters. But he's faded from serious contention, and Cruz, who campaigns as a godly and courageous conservative, has the natural hold on this bunch. He hasn't rounded up all the evangelical voters.
Rubio has elbowed aside Jeb Bush (who?) and Gov. Chris Christie to claim the Establishment lane (also known as the not-Trump-or-Cruz lane). (H)e's the last non-Trump-or-Cruz standing in the win-place-or-show ranks. The Establishment has to have a horseas do suburban Republican voters free of Trump fever and not taken by Cruz's fundamentalism. So Rubio is in control here.
The most interesting lane is Trump's. It seems to be a lane all its own. At times, it doesn't seem to be part of the regular GOP highway. ... The Trump bloc appears to be a blend of Perot independent voters (who were attracted to the billionaire's concern about federal spending and the national debt), Reagan Democrats (who were drawn to that conservative's big-stick approach and racially-tinged welfare-bashing), and Buchanan Republicans (who were in synch with the commentator's right-wing populism and America-first nativism).
Back to the original metaphor: There are three cars hurtling toward a one-lane road. If none run out of gas, it won't be pretty.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/02/trump-rubio-cruz-Republican-lanes-problem
The Mad Max analogy (and picture) are appropriate for the chaotic clown car that is the GOP primary field.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,189 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)Politics is finally and fully show business.
longship
(40,416 posts)ProfessorGAC
(65,134 posts)Most dangerous car ever. The only reason why it didn't rise to a level of national concern is that there weren't enough of them to build big numbers.
Inefficient, ugly, unreliable, and dangerous.
What's not to like?
snooper2
(30,151 posts)ProfessorGAC
(65,134 posts). . .after the dairy he drove for closed.
They were a Buick dealership, and until Hyundai came along, they wanted a better option for econo-cars.
So, they went Yugo.
Those things rattled and bucked when they were brand new.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Was fun for a number of weekends, until the uni-body separated at the firewall on both sides and we had two Yugos
ProfessorGAC
(65,134 posts)Two cars for the price of one!
longship
(40,416 posts)Ugly, but uncomfortable. What's not to love?
IDemo
(16,926 posts)Most of the efforts were focused on finding gasoline and taking it by force, with a lot of noise and violence along the way. So a pretty close description of conservative philosophy.