Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Chair of the House Science Committee Is Harassing NOAA Climate Scientists Again
House Science Committee Chairman Lamar Smith has revived his misguided crusade against climate change scientists who work for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. In a letter to NOAA Administrator Kathryn Sullivan dated February 22, obtained by the Union of Concerned Scientists earlier this week, the chairman demands reams of deliberative materials among scientists related to their work. UCS has previously explained the dangerous precedent that compliance with such a subpoena would set.
My colleague Andrew Rosenberg today replied to the chairmans letter, again urging him to drop the investigation. Political meddling in the process of scientific research will not improve our understanding of the global climate, and harms not only that research but also our nation and our nations scientific enterprise, he wrote. Congressional oversight should prevent such meddling, not exacerbate it.
At the end of 2016, after voicing objection to a NOAA peer-reviewed climate change study published in Science, Chairman Smith subpoenaed NOAA for years of scientists emails, draft papers, peer review comments, and more related to the study of surface temperature records. The subpoena came even though NOAA staff had provided several briefings for committee staff and the chairman had already received all of the data and methodology related to the study in question.
Seven scientific societies expressed grave concern about the chairmans actions, stating that scientists should not be subjected to fraud investigations or harassment simply for providing scientific results that some may see as politically controversial. Hundreds of scientists wrote in support of NOAAs efforts to protect its scientists. The chairman subsequently walked back his request, saying that he was only really interested in communication among political appointees.
My colleague Andrew Rosenberg today replied to the chairmans letter, again urging him to drop the investigation. Political meddling in the process of scientific research will not improve our understanding of the global climate, and harms not only that research but also our nation and our nations scientific enterprise, he wrote. Congressional oversight should prevent such meddling, not exacerbate it.
At the end of 2016, after voicing objection to a NOAA peer-reviewed climate change study published in Science, Chairman Smith subpoenaed NOAA for years of scientists emails, draft papers, peer review comments, and more related to the study of surface temperature records. The subpoena came even though NOAA staff had provided several briefings for committee staff and the chairman had already received all of the data and methodology related to the study in question.
Seven scientific societies expressed grave concern about the chairmans actions, stating that scientists should not be subjected to fraud investigations or harassment simply for providing scientific results that some may see as politically controversial. Hundreds of scientists wrote in support of NOAAs efforts to protect its scientists. The chairman subsequently walked back his request, saying that he was only really interested in communication among political appointees.
http://blog.ucsusa.org/michael-halpern/the-chair-of-the-house-science-committee-is-harassing-noaa-climate-scientists-again?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=fb
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 972 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Chair of the House Science Committee Is Harassing NOAA Climate Scientists Again (Original Post)
Bubzer
Feb 2016
OP
Octafish
(55,745 posts)1. Democrats would be wise to protect the scientists.
To Debbie W-S in Florida/DC: Intelligent voters should know who stands for what and who is screwing whom.
dmr
(28,349 posts)2. Agenda based witch hunt for the greedy fossil fuel industry.
Wasting tax dollars by a purchased Republican asshole.