Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe US relied more on electricity from renewable sources in 1950 than today
http://qz.com/623371/the-us-relied-more-on-electricity-from-renewable-sources-in-1950-than-today/?quality=80&strip=all&w=2400
The fact doesnt make intuitive sense if you think of mid-20th century America as an industrial powerhouse in a time before environmental regulation or solar and wind technology. But the eras lower demand for electricity meant that hydroelectric power coming from the mega-projects of the 1930s, such as the Hoover Dam or the Tennessee Valley Authority, could do a lot of heavy lifting:
In 1950, nearly a third of all US power was hydroelectric. While more hydroelectric power is generated today, growing demand required non-renewable nuclear power and natural gas to fill the gap. Mega-projects like massive dams are falling out of favorits much harder to raise billions and move entire communities today than it was in the Depression-era US, or even contemporary China.
There is some good news: Americans use less petroleum and coal for electricity than before, and wind power is playing a bigger role. But the overall mix is still dependent on the limited supply of fossil fuels we can dig out of the ground. With solar energy barely a rounding error here, you can see we have a long way to go before we meet Elon Musks promise of powering the entire US by covering a corner of Utah or Nevada in solar panels.
All this data comes from the US Energy Information Administration, by way of economist Tim Taylor, who noted a bunch of interesting social indicators released this year as part of president Barack Obamas budget.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 811 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The US relied more on electricity from renewable sources in 1950 than today (Original Post)
FLPanhandle
Feb 2016
OP
Think where we would be today if Carter's alternative energy programs had continued n.t
FLPanhandle
Feb 2016
#1
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)1. Think where we would be today if Carter's alternative energy programs had continued n.t
2naSalit
(86,840 posts)2. A major issue that makes dams a bad choice
is the destruction of ecosystems. Up here, in the northern Rockies, we are seeing the long term results of dam building of the early 20th century from extinction of salmonid species to forests suffering from nutrient deficiency because they lack nutrients delivered from the oceans to the spawning grounds in the mountains. A future design change could allow for coexistence of hydropower and migrating anadromous species and the forests they nourish in their spawning grounds.